Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(416)

Unified Diff: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_form_manager.cc

Issue 1314903003: Updating of all entries in PasswordManager of the same credentials on password update (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: bot fix Created 5 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_form_manager.cc
diff --git a/components/password_manager/core/browser/password_form_manager.cc b/components/password_manager/core/browser/password_form_manager.cc
index 1908ec566c1ae4fc494ba4d107980eaa77dbdd80..6ba4ba2248a03e2474246139561e1d6a7fb30930 100644
--- a/components/password_manager/core/browser/password_form_manager.cc
+++ b/components/password_manager/core/browser/password_form_manager.cc
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ bool PasswordFormManager::IsNewLogin() const {
}
bool PasswordFormManager::IsPendingCredentialsPublicSuffixMatch() const {
- return pending_credentials_.IsPublicSuffixMatch();
+ return pending_credentials_.is_public_suffix_match;
}
void PasswordFormManager::ProvisionallySave(
@@ -442,27 +442,22 @@ void PasswordFormManager::OnRequestDone(
if (is_credential_protected)
protected_credentials.push_back(login.Pass());
+ else
+ not_best_matches_.push_back(login.Pass());
continue;
}
- // If there is another best-score match for the same username, replace it.
- // TODO(vabr): Spare the replacing and keep the first instead of the last
- // candidate.
+ // If there is another best-score match for the same username then leave it
+ // and add the current form to |not_best_matches_|.
const base::string16& username = login->username_value;
auto best_match_username = best_matches_.find(username);
- if (best_match_username != best_matches_.end() &&
- best_match_username->second == preferred_match_) {
- preferred_match_ = nullptr;
+ if (best_match_username == best_matches_.end()) {
+ if (login->preferred)
+ preferred_match_ = login.get();
+ best_matches_.insert(username, login.Pass());
+ } else {
+ not_best_matches_.push_back(login.Pass());
}
- // Transfer ownership into the map.
- const PasswordForm* best_match = login.get();
- // TODO(mgiuca): Directly assign to |best_match_username|, instead of doing
- // a second map traversal. This will only be possible once we have C++11
- // library support (then |best_matches_| can be a map of scoped_ptrs instead
- // of a ScopedPtrMap).
- best_matches_.set(username, login.Pass());
- if (best_match->preferred)
- preferred_match_ = best_match;
}
// Add the protected results if we don't already have a result with the same
@@ -473,7 +468,10 @@ void PasswordFormManager::OnRequestDone(
scoped_ptr<PasswordForm> protege(*it);
*it = nullptr;
const base::string16& username = protege->username_value;
- best_matches_.insert(username, protege.Pass());
+ if (best_matches_.find(username) == best_matches_.end())
+ best_matches_.insert(username, protege.Pass());
+ else
+ not_best_matches_.push_back(protege.Pass());
}
UMA_HISTOGRAM_COUNTS("PasswordManager.NumPasswordsNotShown",
@@ -525,10 +523,10 @@ void PasswordFormManager::ProcessFrameInternal(
// TODO(engedy): Clean this up. See: https://crbug.com/476519.
bool wait_for_username =
client_->IsOffTheRecord() ||
- (!IsValidAndroidFacetURI(preferred_match_->original_signon_realm) &&
+ (!IsValidAndroidFacetURI(preferred_match_->signon_realm) &&
(observed_form_.action.GetWithEmptyPath() !=
preferred_match_->action.GetWithEmptyPath() ||
- preferred_match_->IsPublicSuffixMatch() ||
+ preferred_match_->is_public_suffix_match ||
observed_form_.IsPossibleChangePasswordForm()));
if (wait_for_username)
manager_action_ = kManagerActionNone;
@@ -664,6 +662,7 @@ void PasswordFormManager::UpdateLogin() {
UpdatePreferredLoginState(password_store);
+ bool password_was_updated = false;
// Update the new preferred login.
if (!selected_username_.empty()) {
// Username has changed. We set this selected username as the real
@@ -689,8 +688,28 @@ void PasswordFormManager::UpdateLogin() {
pending_credentials_.submit_element = observed_form_.submit_element;
password_store->UpdateLoginWithPrimaryKey(pending_credentials_,
old_primary_key);
+ password_was_updated = true;
} else {
password_store->UpdateLogin(pending_credentials_);
+ password_was_updated = true;
+ }
+ // If this was password update then update all non-best matches entries with
+ // the same username and the same old password.
+ if (password_was_updated) {
+ PasswordFormMap::const_iterator updated_password_it =
+ best_matches_.find(pending_credentials_.username_value);
+ DCHECK(best_matches_.end() != updated_password_it);
+ const base::string16& old_password =
+ updated_password_it->second->password_value;
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < not_best_matches_.size(); ++i) {
+ if (not_best_matches_[i]->username_value ==
+ pending_credentials_.username_value &&
+ not_best_matches_[i]->password_value == old_password) {
+ not_best_matches_[i]->password_value =
+ pending_credentials_.password_value;
+ password_store->UpdateLogin(*not_best_matches_[i]);
+ }
+ }
}
}
@@ -793,10 +812,11 @@ void PasswordFormManager::CreatePendingCredentials() {
pending_credentials_ = *it->second;
password_overridden_ =
pending_credentials_.password_value != password_to_save;
- if (IsPendingCredentialsPublicSuffixMatch()) {
- // If the autofilled credentials were only a PSL match, store a copy with
- // the current origin and signon realm. This ensures that on the next
- // visit, a precise match is found.
+ if (IsPendingCredentialsPublicSuffixMatch() ||
+ IsValidAndroidFacetURI(preferred_match_->signon_realm)) {
+ // If the autofilled credentials were a PSL match or credentials stored
+ // from Android apps store a copy with the current origin and signon
+ // realm. This ensures that on the next visit, a precise match is found.
is_new_login_ = true;
user_action_ = password_overridden_ ? kUserActionOverridePassword
: kUserActionChoosePslMatch;
@@ -816,6 +836,11 @@ void PasswordFormManager::CreatePendingCredentials() {
// passwords. This is a much larger change.
UpdateMetadataForUsage(pending_credentials_);
+ // Update |pending_credentials_| in order to be able correctly save it.
+ pending_credentials_.origin = provisionally_saved_form_->origin;
+ pending_credentials_.signon_realm =
+ provisionally_saved_form_->signon_realm;
+
// Normally, the copy of the PSL matched credentials, adapted for the
// current domain, is saved automatically without asking the user, because
// the copy likely represents the same account, i.e., the one for which
@@ -825,9 +850,9 @@ void PasswordFormManager::CreatePendingCredentials() {
// that the autofilled credentials and |provisionally_saved_form_|
// actually correspond to two different accounts (see
// http://crbug.com/385619). In that case the user should be asked again
- // before saving the password. This is ensured by clearing
- // |original_signon_realm| on |pending_credentials_|, which unmarks it as
- // a PSL match.
+ // before saving the password. This is ensured by setting
+ // |password_overriden_| on |pending_credentials_| to false and setting
+ // |origin| and |signon_realm| to correct values.
//
// There is still the edge case when the autofilled credentials represent
// the same account as |provisionally_saved_form_| but the stored password
@@ -839,8 +864,8 @@ void PasswordFormManager::CreatePendingCredentials() {
// user by asking them is not significant, so we are fine with asking
// here again.
if (password_overridden_) {
- pending_credentials_.original_signon_realm.clear();
- DCHECK(!IsPendingCredentialsPublicSuffixMatch());
+ pending_credentials_.is_public_suffix_match = false;
+ password_overridden_ = false;
}
} else { // Not a PSL match.
is_new_login_ = false;
@@ -896,6 +921,7 @@ void PasswordFormManager::CreatePendingCredentials() {
}
pending_credentials_.action = provisionally_saved_form_->action;
+
// If the user selected credentials we autofilled from a PasswordForm
// that contained no action URL (IE6/7 imported passwords, for example),
// bless it with the action URL from the observed form. See bug 1107719.
@@ -943,7 +969,7 @@ uint32_t PasswordFormManager::ScoreResult(const PasswordForm& candidate) const {
std::min(form_path_segments_.size(), kSegmentCountCap);
uint32_t score = 0u;
- if (!candidate.IsPublicSuffixMatch()) {
+ if (!candidate.is_public_suffix_match) {
score += 1u << 7;
}
if (candidate.origin == observed_form_.origin) {
@@ -986,7 +1012,7 @@ bool PasswordFormManager::IsBlacklistMatch(
const autofill::PasswordForm& blacklisted_form) const {
DCHECK(blacklisted_form.blacklisted_by_user);
- if (blacklisted_form.IsPublicSuffixMatch())
+ if (blacklisted_form.is_public_suffix_match)
return false;
if (blacklisted_form.origin.GetOrigin() != observed_form_.origin.GetOrigin())
return false;
@@ -1014,7 +1040,7 @@ void PasswordFormManager::DeleteEmptyUsernameCredentials() {
}
for (auto iter = best_matches_.begin(); iter != best_matches_.end(); ++iter) {
PasswordForm* form = iter->second;
- if (!form->IsPublicSuffixMatch() && form->username_value.empty() &&
+ if (!form->is_public_suffix_match && form->username_value.empty() &&
form->password_value == pending_credentials_.password_value)
password_store->RemoveLogin(*form);
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698