Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2172)

Unified Diff: base/safe_numerics_impl.h

Issue 131063002: Expand support in safe_numeric.h (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src/
Patch Set: Removed macros and split out implementation header Created 6 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: base/safe_numerics_impl.h
===================================================================
--- base/safe_numerics_impl.h (revision 0)
+++ base/safe_numerics_impl.h (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#ifndef BASE_SAFE_NUMERICS_IMPL_H_
+#define BASE_SAFE_NUMERICS_IMPL_H_
+
+#include <limits>
+
+#include "base/macros.h"
+
+namespace base {
+namespace internal {
+
+// Helper templates to determine if our destination type can contain all values
+// represented by the source type.
+
+template<typename Dest,
akalin 2014/01/14 00:49:19 nit: space before <
jschuh 2014/01/14 05:24:33 Done.
+ typename Source,
+ bool IsDestSigned = std::numeric_limits<Dest>::is_signed,
akalin 2014/01/14 00:49:19 perhaps define enums for DestSigned and SourceSign
jschuh 2014/01/14 05:24:33 Done.
+ bool IsSourceSigned = std::numeric_limits<Source>::is_signed>
+struct DoesRangeContainRange {};
+
+template<typename Dest, typename Source, bool IsSigned>
akalin 2014/01/14 00:49:19 doesn't look like this overload is used. remove?
jschuh 2014/01/14 05:24:33 It caught the case where the signs matched, but I
+struct DoesRangeContainRange<Dest, Source, IsSigned, IsSigned> {
+ // We always treat float to integral as narrowing.
+ static const bool value = std::numeric_limits<Dest>::is_integer &&
akalin 2014/01/14 00:49:19 maybe use an enum for this, too? e.g. CONTAINS_RAN
jschuh 2014/01/14 05:24:33 Done.
+ sizeof(Dest) >= sizeof(Source);
+};
+
+template<typename Dest, typename Source>
+struct DoesRangeContainRange<Dest, Source, true, false> {
+ // We always treat float to integral as narrowing.
+ static const bool value = std::numeric_limits<Dest>::is_integer &&
+ sizeof(Dest) > sizeof(Source);
+};
+
+template<typename Dest, typename Source>
+struct DoesRangeContainRange<Dest, Source, false, true> {
+ static const bool value = false;
+};
+
+
+// The following templates are for ranges that must be verified at runtime. We
+// split it into checks based on signedness to avoid confusing casts and
+// compiler warnings on signed an unsigned comparisons.
+
+enum NumericRangeCheckResult {
+ TYPE_VALID = 0, // Value can be represented by the destination type.
+ TYPE_UNDERFLOW = 1, // Value would overflow.
+ TYPE_OVERFLOW = 2, // Value would underflow.
+ TYPE_INVALID = 3 // Source value is invalid (i.e. NaN).
+};
+
+// This macro creates a NumericRangeCheckResult from an upper and lower bound
+// check by taking advantage of the fact that only NaN can be out of range in
+// both directions at once.
+#define BASE_NUMERIC_RANGE_CHECK_RESULT(is_in_upper_bound, is_in_lower_bound) \
+ NumericRangeCheckResult(((is_in_upper_bound) ? 0 : TYPE_OVERFLOW) | \
+ ((is_in_lower_bound) ? 0 : TYPE_UNDERFLOW))
+
+template<typename Dest,
+ typename Source,
+ bool IsDestSigned = std::numeric_limits<Dest>::is_signed,
+ bool IsSourceSigned = std::numeric_limits<Source>::is_signed,
+ bool DoesDestRangeContainSourceRange = DoesRangeContainRange<Dest,
+ Source>::value>
+struct NumericRangeCheckImpl {};
+
+// Dest range always contains the result: nothing to check.
+template<typename Dest, typename Source, bool IsDestSigned, bool IsSourceSigned>
+struct NumericRangeCheckImpl<Dest, Source, IsDestSigned, IsSourceSigned, true> {
+ static NumericRangeCheckResult run(Source) {
akalin 2014/01/14 00:49:19 would name this Check() myself
akalin 2014/01/14 00:49:19 I'd prefer (Source x), even though you don't use x
+ return BASE_NUMERIC_RANGE_CHECK_RESULT(true, true);
+ }
+};
+
+// Signed to signed narrowing.
+template<typename Dest, typename Source>
+struct NumericRangeCheckImpl<Dest, Source, true, true, false> {
+ static NumericRangeCheckResult run(Source x) {
+ typedef std::numeric_limits<Dest> DestLimits;
+ return BASE_NUMERIC_RANGE_CHECK_RESULT(x <= DestLimits::max(),
+ x >= DestLimits::min());
+ }
+};
+
+// Unsigned to unsigned narrowing.
+template<typename Dest, typename Source>
+struct NumericRangeCheckImpl<Dest, Source, false, false, false> {
+ static NumericRangeCheckResult run(Source x) {
+ typedef std::numeric_limits<Dest> DestLimits;
+ return BASE_NUMERIC_RANGE_CHECK_RESULT(x <= DestLimits::max(), true);
+ }
+};
+
+// Unsigned to signed.
+template<typename Dest, typename Source>
+struct NumericRangeCheckImpl<Dest, Source, true, false, false> {
+ static NumericRangeCheckResult run(Source x) {
+ typedef std::numeric_limits<Dest> DestLimits;
+ return sizeof(Dest) >= sizeof(Source) ?
+ BASE_NUMERIC_RANGE_CHECK_RESULT(true, true) :
+ BASE_NUMERIC_RANGE_CHECK_RESULT(x <= Source(DestLimits::max()), true);
+ }
+};
+
+// Signed to unsigned.
+template<typename Dest, typename Source>
+struct NumericRangeCheckImpl<Dest, Source, false, true, false> {
+ static NumericRangeCheckResult run(Source x) {
+ typedef std::numeric_limits<Dest> DestLimits;
+ return sizeof(Dest) >= sizeof(Source) ?
+ BASE_NUMERIC_RANGE_CHECK_RESULT(true, x >= 0) :
+ BASE_NUMERIC_RANGE_CHECK_RESULT(x <= Source(DestLimits::max()), x >= 0);
+ }
+};
+
+template<typename Dest, typename Source>
+inline NumericRangeCheckResult NumericRangeCheck(Source x) {
+ COMPILE_ASSERT(std::numeric_limits<Source>::is_specialized,
+ argument_must_be_numeric);
+ COMPILE_ASSERT(std::numeric_limits<Dest>::is_specialized,
+ argument_must_be_numeric);
+ COMPILE_ASSERT(std::numeric_limits<Dest>::is_integer,
+ result_must_be_integral);
+ return NumericRangeCheckImpl<Dest, Source>::run(x);
+}
+
+} // namespace internal
+} // namespace base
+
+#endif // BASE_SAFE_NUMERICS_IMPL_H_
+
Property changes on: base\safe_numerics_impl.h
___________________________________________________________________
Added: svn:eol-style
+ LF

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698