Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(671)

Issues Search
    My Issues | Starred     Open | Closed | All

Unified Diff: third_party/mojo/src/mojo/edk/system/connection_manager_unittest.cc

Issue 1310103002: Update mojo sdk to rev c02a28868825edfa57ab77947b8cb15e741c5598 (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « third_party/mojo/src/mojo/edk/system/connection_manager.h ('k') | third_party/mojo/src/mojo/edk/system/core.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: third_party/mojo/src/mojo/edk/system/connection_manager_unittest.cc
diff --git a/third_party/mojo/src/mojo/edk/system/connection_manager_unittest.cc b/third_party/mojo/src/mojo/edk/system/connection_manager_unittest.cc
index cb22ef3401e20c7383cc627834d67f0816713315..20fa73e33243ac8861bb60cd45617b892347b2f4 100644
--- a/third_party/mojo/src/mojo/edk/system/connection_manager_unittest.cc
+++ b/third_party/mojo/src/mojo/edk/system/connection_manager_unittest.cc
@@ -226,12 +226,14 @@ TEST_F(ConnectionManagerTest, BasicConnectSlaves) {
ProcessIdentifier peer1 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h1;
- EXPECT_TRUE(slave1.Connect(connection_id, &peer1, &h1));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_NEW_CONNECTION,
+ slave1.Connect(connection_id, &peer1, &h1));
EXPECT_EQ(slave2_id, peer1);
EXPECT_TRUE(h1.is_valid());
ProcessIdentifier peer2 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h2;
- EXPECT_TRUE(slave2.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_NEW_CONNECTION,
+ slave2.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
EXPECT_EQ(slave1_id, peer2);
EXPECT_TRUE(h2.is_valid());
@@ -319,7 +321,8 @@ TEST_F(ConnectionManagerTest, SlaveCancelConnect) {
EXPECT_TRUE(slave1.CancelConnect(connection_id));
ProcessIdentifier peer2 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h2;
- EXPECT_FALSE(slave2.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::FAILURE,
+ slave2.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
EXPECT_EQ(kInvalidProcessIdentifier, peer2);
EXPECT_FALSE(h2.is_valid());
@@ -361,7 +364,8 @@ TEST_F(ConnectionManagerTest, ErrorRemovePending) {
ProcessIdentifier peer2 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h2;
- EXPECT_FALSE(slave2.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::FAILURE,
+ slave2.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
EXPECT_EQ(kInvalidProcessIdentifier, peer2);
EXPECT_FALSE(h2.is_valid());
@@ -384,16 +388,16 @@ TEST_F(ConnectionManagerTest, ConnectSlaveToSelf) {
EXPECT_TRUE(slave.AllowConnect(connection_id));
EXPECT_TRUE(slave.AllowConnect(connection_id));
- // Currently, the connect-to-self case is signalled by the master not sending
- // back a handle.
ProcessIdentifier peer1 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h1;
- EXPECT_TRUE(slave.Connect(connection_id, &peer1, &h1));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_SAME_PROCESS,
+ slave.Connect(connection_id, &peer1, &h1));
EXPECT_EQ(slave_id, peer1);
EXPECT_FALSE(h1.is_valid());
ProcessIdentifier peer2 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h2;
- EXPECT_TRUE(slave.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_SAME_PROCESS,
+ slave.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
EXPECT_EQ(slave_id, peer2);
EXPECT_FALSE(h2.is_valid());
@@ -425,30 +429,36 @@ TEST_F(ConnectionManagerTest, ConnectSlavesTwice) {
ProcessIdentifier peer1 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h1;
- EXPECT_TRUE(slave1.Connect(connection_id, &peer1, &h1));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_NEW_CONNECTION,
+ slave1.Connect(connection_id, &peer1, &h1));
EXPECT_EQ(slave2_id, peer1);
ProcessIdentifier peer2 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h2;
- EXPECT_TRUE(slave2.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_NEW_CONNECTION,
+ slave2.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
EXPECT_EQ(slave1_id, peer2);
EXPECT_TRUE(ArePlatformHandlesConnected(h1.get(), h2.get()));
- // Currently, the master doesn't detect the case of connecting a pair of
- // slaves that are already connected. (Doing so would require more careful
- // tracking and is prone to races -- especially if we want slaves to be able
- // to tear down no-longer-needed connections.) But the slaves should be able
- // to do the tracking themselves (using the peer process identifiers).
+ // TODO(vtl): Currently, the master doesn't detect the case of connecting a
+ // pair of slaves that are already connected. (Doing so would require more
+ // careful tracking and is prone to races -- especially if we want slaves to
+ // be able to tear down no-longer-needed connections.) But the slaves should
+ // be able to do the tracking themselves (using the peer process identifiers).
connection_id = master.GenerateConnectionIdentifier();
EXPECT_TRUE(slave1.AllowConnect(connection_id));
EXPECT_TRUE(slave2.AllowConnect(connection_id));
h1.reset();
h2.reset();
+ // TODO(vtl): FIXME -- this will break when I implemented
+ // SUCCESS_CONNECT_REUSE_CONNECTION.
ProcessIdentifier second_peer2 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
- EXPECT_TRUE(slave2.Connect(connection_id, &second_peer2, &h2));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_NEW_CONNECTION,
+ slave2.Connect(connection_id, &second_peer2, &h2));
ProcessIdentifier second_peer1 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
- EXPECT_TRUE(slave1.Connect(connection_id, &second_peer1, &h1));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_NEW_CONNECTION,
+ slave1.Connect(connection_id, &second_peer1, &h1));
EXPECT_EQ(peer1, second_peer1);
EXPECT_EQ(peer2, second_peer2);
@@ -476,12 +486,14 @@ TEST_F(ConnectionManagerTest, ConnectMasterToSlave) {
ProcessIdentifier master_peer = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle master_h;
- EXPECT_TRUE(master.Connect(connection_id, &master_peer, &master_h));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_NEW_CONNECTION,
+ master.Connect(connection_id, &master_peer, &master_h));
EXPECT_EQ(slave_id, master_peer);
EXPECT_TRUE(master_h.is_valid());
ProcessIdentifier slave_peer = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle slave_h;
- EXPECT_TRUE(slave.Connect(connection_id, &slave_peer, &slave_h));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_NEW_CONNECTION,
+ slave.Connect(connection_id, &slave_peer, &slave_h));
EXPECT_EQ(kMasterProcessIdentifier, slave_peer);
EXPECT_TRUE(slave_h.is_valid());
@@ -500,16 +512,16 @@ TEST_F(ConnectionManagerTest, ConnectMasterToSelf) {
EXPECT_TRUE(master.AllowConnect(connection_id));
EXPECT_TRUE(master.AllowConnect(connection_id));
- // Currently, the connect-to-self case is signalled by the master not sending
- // back a handle.
ProcessIdentifier peer1 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h1;
- EXPECT_TRUE(master.Connect(connection_id, &peer1, &h1));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_SAME_PROCESS,
+ master.Connect(connection_id, &peer1, &h1));
EXPECT_EQ(kMasterProcessIdentifier, peer1);
EXPECT_FALSE(h1.is_valid());
ProcessIdentifier peer2 = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h2;
- EXPECT_TRUE(master.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_SAME_PROCESS,
+ master.Connect(connection_id, &peer2, &h2));
EXPECT_EQ(kMasterProcessIdentifier, peer2);
EXPECT_FALSE(h2.is_valid());
@@ -536,7 +548,8 @@ TEST_F(ConnectionManagerTest, MasterCancelConnect) {
EXPECT_TRUE(master.CancelConnect(connection_id));
ProcessIdentifier peer = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h;
- EXPECT_FALSE(slave.Connect(connection_id, &peer, &h));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::FAILURE,
+ slave.Connect(connection_id, &peer, &h));
EXPECT_EQ(kInvalidProcessIdentifier, peer);
EXPECT_FALSE(h.is_valid());
@@ -573,7 +586,8 @@ TEST_F(ConnectionManagerTest, AddSlaveAndBootstrap) {
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h1;
ProcessIdentifier master_peer = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
- EXPECT_TRUE(master.Connect(connection_id, &master_peer, &h1));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_NEW_CONNECTION,
+ master.Connect(connection_id, &master_peer, &h1));
EXPECT_EQ(slave_id, master_peer);
EXPECT_TRUE(h1.is_valid());
@@ -585,7 +599,8 @@ TEST_F(ConnectionManagerTest, AddSlaveAndBootstrap) {
ProcessIdentifier slave_peer = kInvalidProcessIdentifier;
embedder::ScopedPlatformHandle h2;
- EXPECT_TRUE(slave.Connect(connection_id, &slave_peer, &h2));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ConnectionManager::Result::SUCCESS_CONNECT_NEW_CONNECTION,
+ slave.Connect(connection_id, &slave_peer, &h2));
EXPECT_EQ(kMasterProcessIdentifier, slave_peer);
EXPECT_TRUE(ArePlatformHandlesConnected(h1.get(), h2.get()));
« no previous file with comments | « third_party/mojo/src/mojo/edk/system/connection_manager.h ('k') | third_party/mojo/src/mojo/edk/system/core.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698