Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(990)

Unified Diff: utils/pub/version_solver2.dart

Issue 13095015: Use backtracking when solving dependency constraints. (Closed) Base URL: https://dart.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/dart
Patch Set: Allow both solvers to coexist. Created 7 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: utils/pub/version_solver2.dart
diff --git a/utils/pub/version_solver2.dart b/utils/pub/version_solver2.dart
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f64e9c3c05499ee9f087253f7dec741cce6d1d62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/utils/pub/version_solver2.dart
@@ -0,0 +1,454 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2012, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
+// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
+// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+/// Pub's constraint solver. It is a back-tracking depth-first solver.
+///
+/// Note that internally it uses explicit [Completer]s instead of chaining
+/// futures like most async code. This is to avoid accumulating very long
+/// chains of futures. Since this may iterate through many states, hanging an
+/// increasing long series of `.then()` calls off each other can end up eating
+/// piles of memory for both the futures and the stack traces.
+library version_solver2;
+
+import 'dart:async';
+import 'dart:collection' show Queue;
+import 'dart:json' as json;
+import 'dart:math';
+import 'lock_file.dart';
+import 'log.dart' as log;
+import 'package.dart';
+import 'pubspec.dart';
+import 'source.dart';
+import 'source_registry.dart';
+import 'utils.dart';
+import 'version.dart';
+import 'version_solver.dart';
+
+/// How many times we allow the solver to backtrack looking for a solution
+/// before giving up.
+// TODO(rnystrom): What value should this have? Should it be based on graph
+// size?
+const _MAX_BACKTRACKING = 10000;
nweiz 2013/03/29 01:58:25 As discussed offline, I don't like having an itera
Bob Nystrom 2013/03/30 00:15:55 Done.
+
+class BacktrackingVersionSolver extends VersionSolver {
+ /// The set of packages that are being explicitly updated. The solver will
+ /// only allow the very latest version for each of these packages.
+ final _forceLatest = new Set<String>();
+
+ /// The current state being explored. Its parent links enable us to walk
+ /// back up the tree to other earlier states.
+ SolveState _state;
+
+ /// The number of solutions we've tried so far.
+ int _iterations = 0;
+
+ BacktrackingVersionSolver(SourceRegistry sources, Package root,
+ LockFile lockFile, List<String> useLatest)
+ : super(sources, root, lockFile, useLatest);
+
+ void forceLatestVersion(String package) {
+ _forceLatest.add(package);
+ }
+
+ Future<List<PackageId>> runSolver() {
+ var completer = new Completer<List<PackageId>>();
+ _processState(completer);
+ return completer.future;
+ }
+
+ /// Creates a new node in the solution space that tries [versions] for
+ /// package [name]. Returns the new node.
+ SolveState push(String name, List<Version> versions) {
+ _state = new SolveState(_state, name, versions);
+ _state.trace();
+ return _state;
+ }
+
+ /// Loads the pubspec for the package identified by [id].
+ Future<Pubspec> getPubspec(PackageId id) {
+ // The root package doesn't have a source, so special case it.
+ if (id.isRoot) return new Future.immediate(root.pubspec);
+
+ return cache.getPubspec(id);
+ }
+
+ /// Gets the list of versions for [package].
+ Future<List<PackageId>> getVersions(String package, Source source,
+ description) {
+ return cache.getVersions(package, source, description);
+ }
+
+ /// Gets the version of [package] currently locked in the lock file. Returns
+ /// `null` if it isn't in the lockfile (or has been unlocked).
+ PackageId getLocked(String package) => lockFile.packages[package];
+
+ /// Processes the current possible solution state. If successful, completes
+ /// [completer] with the solution. If not, tries the next state (and so on).
+ /// If there are no more states, completes to the last error that occurred.
+ void _processState(Completer<List<PackageId>> completer) {
+ if (_iterations++ > _MAX_BACKTRACKING) {
+ completer.completeError(new CouldNotSolveException());
+ }
+
+ var state = _state;
+
+ var propagator = new Propagator(this, state);
+ propagator.propagate().then((result) {
+ completer.complete(result);
+ }).catchError((error) {
+ if (error.error is! SolverFailure) {
+ completer.completeError(error);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Try the next state, if there is one.
+ if (state != _state || _advanceState()) {
+ _processState(completer);
+ } else {
+ // All out of solutions, so fail.
+ completer.completeError(error);
+ }
+ });
+ }
+
+ /// Advances to the next node in the possible solution tree.
+ bool _advanceState() {
+ while (_state != null) {
+ if (_state.advance()) return true;
+
+ // The current state is done, so pop it and try the parent.
+ _state = _state._parent;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+/// Given a [SolveState] that selects a set of package versions, this tries to
+/// traverse the dependency graph and see if a complete set of valid versions
+/// has been selected.
+class Propagator {
+ final BacktrackingVersionSolver _solver;
+
+ /// The queue of packages left to traverse. We do a bread-first traversal
+ /// using an explicit queue just to avoid the code complexity of a recursive
+ /// asynchronous traversal.
+ final _packages = new Queue<PackageId>();
+
+ /// The packages we have already traversed. Used to avoid traversing the same
+ /// package multiple times, and to build the complete solution results.
+ final _visited = new Set<PackageId>();
+
+ /// The known dependencies visited so far.
+ final _dependencies = <String, List<Dependency>>{};
+
+ /// The solution being tested.
+ SolveState _state;
+
+ Propagator(this._solver, this._state);
+
+ Future<List<PackageId>> propagate() {
+ // Start at the root.
+ _packages.add(new PackageId.root(_solver.root));
+
+ var completer = new Completer<List<PackageId>>();
+ _processPackage(completer);
+ return completer.future;
+ }
+
+ void trace([String message]) {
+ if (_state == null) {
+ // Don't waste time building the string if it will be ignored.
+ if (!log.isEnabled(log.Level.SOLVER)) return;
+
+ // No message means just describe the current state.
+ if (message == null) {
+ message = "* start at root";
+ } else {
+ // Otherwise, indent it under the current state.
+ message = "| $message";
+ }
+
+ log.solver("| $message");
+ } else {
+ _state.trace(message);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// Traverses the next package in the queue. Completes [completer] with a
+ /// list of package IDs if the traversal completely successfully and found a
+ /// solution. Completes to an error if the traversal failed. Otherwise,
+ /// recurses to the next package in the queue, etc.
+ void _processPackage(Completer<List<PackageId>> completer) {
+ if (_packages.isEmpty) {
+ // We traversed the whole graph. If we got here, we successfully found
+ // a solution.
+ completer.complete(_visited.toList());
+ return;
+ }
+
+ var id = _packages.removeFirst();
+
+ // Don't visit the same package twice.
+ if (_visited.contains(id)) {
+ _processPackage(completer);
+ return;
+ }
+ _visited.add(id);
+
+ _solver.getPubspec(id).then((pubspec) {
+ var refs = pubspec.dependencies.toList();
+
+ // Include dev dependencies of the root package.
+ if (id.isRoot) refs.addAll(pubspec.devDependencies);
+
+ // TODO(rnystrom): Sort in some best-first order to minimize backtracking.
+ // Bundler's model is:
+ // Easiest to resolve is defined by:
+ // 1) Is this gem already activated?
+ // 2) Do the version requirements include prereleased gems?
+ // 3) Sort by number of gems available in the source.
+ // Can probably do something similar, but we should profile against
+ // real-world package graphs that require backtracking to see which
+ // heuristics work best for Dart.
+ refs.sort((a, b) => a.name.compareTo(b.name));
+
+ _traverseRefs(completer, id.name, new Queue<PackageRef>.from(refs));
+ }).catchError((error){
+ completer.completeError(error);
+ });
+ }
+
+ /// Traverses the references that [depender] depends on, stored in [refs].
+ /// Desctructively modifies [refs]. Completes [completer] to a list of
+ /// packages if the traversal is complete. Completes it to an error if a
+ /// failure occurred. Otherwise, recurses.
+ void _traverseRefs(Completer<List<PackageId>> completer,
+ String depender, Queue<PackageRef> refs) {
+ // Move onto the next package if we've traversed all of these references.
+ if (refs.isEmpty) {
+ _processPackage(completer);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ var ref = refs.removeFirst();
+
+ // Note the dependency.
+ var dependencies = _dependencies.putIfAbsent(ref.name,
+ () => <Dependency>[]);
+ dependencies.add(new Dependency(depender, ref));
+
+ // Make sure the dependencies agree on source and description.
+ var required = _getRequired(ref.name);
+ if (required != null) {
+ // Make sure all of the existing sources match the new reference.
+ if (required.ref.source.name != ref.source.name) {
+ trace('source mismatch on ${ref.name}: ${required.ref.source} '
+ '!= ${ref.source}');
+ completer.completeError(new SourceMismatchException(ref.name,
+ required.depender, required.ref.source, depender, ref.source));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Make sure all of the existing descriptions match the new reference.
+ if (!ref.descriptionEquals(required.ref)) {
+ trace('description mismatch on ${ref.name}: '
+ '${required.ref.description} != ${ref.description}');
+ completer.completeError(new DescriptionMismatchException(ref.name,
+ required.depender, required.ref.description,
+ depender, ref.description));
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Determine the overall version constraint.
+ var constraint = dependencies
+ .map((dep) => dep.ref.constraint)
+ .reduce(VersionConstraint.any, (a, b) => a.intersect(b));
+
+ // TODO(rnystrom): Currently we just backtrack to the previous state when
+ // a failure occurs here. Another option is back*jumping*. When we hit
+ // this, we could jump straight to the nearest SolveState that selects a
+ // depender that is causing this state to fail. Before doing that, though,
+ // we should:
+ //
+ // 1. Write some complex solver tests that validate which order packages
+ // are downgraded to reach a solution.
+ // 2. Get some real-world data on which package graphs go pathological.
+
+ // See if it's possible for a package to match that constraint. We
+ // check this first so that this error is preferred over "no versions"
+ // which can be thrown if the current selection does not match the
+ // constraint.
+ if (constraint.isEmpty) {
+ trace('disjoint constraints on ${ref.name}');
+ completer.completeError(
+ new DisjointConstraintException(ref.name, dependencies));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ var selected = _getSelected(ref.name);
+ if (selected != null) {
+ // Make sure it meets the constraint.
+ if (!ref.constraint.allows(selected.version)) {
+ trace('selection $selected does not match $constraint');
+ completer.completeError(
+ new NoVersionException(ref.name, constraint, dependencies));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Traverse into it.
+ _packages.add(selected);
+ _traverseRefs(completer, depender, refs);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // We haven't selected a version. Create a substate that tries all
+ // versions that match the constraints we currently have for this
+ // package.
+ _solver.getVersions(ref.name, ref.source, ref.description).then((versions) {
+ var allowed = versions.where(
+ (id) => constraint.allows(id.version)).toList();
+
+ // See if it's in the lockfile. If so, try that version first. If the
+ // locked version doesn't match our constraint, just ignore it.
+ var locked = _getLocked(ref.name, constraint);
+ if (locked != null) {
+ allowed.removeWhere((ref) => ref.version == locked.version);
+ allowed.insert(0, locked);
+ }
+
+ if (allowed.isEmpty) {
+ trace('no versions for ${ref.name} match $constraint');
+ completer.completeError(new NoVersionException(ref.name, constraint,
+ dependencies));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // If we're doing an upgrade on this package, only allow the latest
+ // version.
+ if (_solver._forceLatest.contains(ref.name)) allowed = [allowed.first];
+
+ // Try to continue solving with the first selected package.
+ _state = _solver.push(ref.name, allowed);
+ selected = _getSelected(ref.name);
+ assert(selected != null);
+
+ _packages.add(selected);
+ _traverseRefs(completer, depender, refs);
+ }).catchError((error) {
+ print(error);
+ completer.completeError(error);
+ });
+ }
+
+ /// Gets the currently selected package named [package] or `null` if no
+ /// concrete package has been selected with that name yet.
+ PackageId _getSelected(String name) {
+ // Always prefer the root package.
+ if (_solver.root.name == name) return new PackageId.root(_solver.root);
+
+ // Nothing is selected if we're in the starting state.
+ if (_state == null) return null;
+
+ return _state.getSelected(name);
+ }
+
+ /// Gets a "required" reference to the package [name]. This is the first
+ /// non-root dependency on that package. All dependencies on a package must
+ /// agree on source and description, except for references to the root
+ /// package. This will return a reference to that "canonical" source and
+ /// description, or `null` if there is no required reference yet.
+ Dependency _getRequired(String name) {
+ var dependencies = _dependencies[name];
+ assert(dependencies != null);
+
+ return dependencies
+ .firstWhere((dep) => !dep.ref.isRoot, orElse: () => null);
+ }
+
+ /// Gets the package [name] that's currently contained in the lockfile if it
+ /// meets [constraint] and has the same source and description as other
+ /// references to that package. Returns `null` otherwise.
+ PackageId _getLocked(String name, VersionConstraint constraint) {
+ var package = _solver.getLocked(name);
+ if (package == null) return null;
+
+ if (!constraint.allows(package.version)) return null;
+
+ var dependencies = _dependencies[name];
+ assert(dependencies != null);
+
+ var required = _getRequired(name);
+ if (required != null) {
+ if (package.source.name != required.ref.source.name) return null;
+ if (!package.descriptionEquals(required.ref)) return null;
+ }
+
+ return package;
+ }
+}
+
+/// One node in the possible solution tree that is being traversed. Each node
+/// reflects one of a set of speculative choices that may turn out to be wrong.
+class SolveState {
+ final SolveState _parent;
+
+ /// The name of the package this state selects.
+ final String _package;
+
+ /// The list of versions that can possibly be selected.
+ final List<PackageId> _possible;
+
+ /// The currently selected version in [_possible].
+ int _current = 0;
+
+ SolveState(this._parent, this._package, this._possible);
+
+ void trace([Object message]) {
+ // Don't waste time building the string if it will be ignored.
+ if (!log.isEnabled(log.Level.SOLVER)) return;
+
+ // No message means just describe the current state.
+ if (message == null) {
+ message = "* select ${_possible[_current]} "
+ "($_current/${_possible.length})";
+ } else {
+ // Otherwise, indent it under the current state.
+ message = "| $message";
+ }
+
+ var buffer = new StringBuffer();
+
+ // Indent for the parent states.
+ var state = _parent;
+ while (state != null) {
+ buffer.write('| ');
+ state = state._parent;
+ }
+
+ buffer.write(message);
+ log.solver(buffer);
+ }
+
+ /// Tries to move to the next version in the list. Returns `false` if there
+ /// are no more versions.
+ bool advance() {
+ _current++;
+ if (_current < _possible.length) {
+ trace();
+ return true;
+ } else {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// Gets the selected version of [package]. If no version has been selected
+ /// yet, returns `null`.
+ PackageId getSelected(String package) {
+ if (_package == package) return _possible[_current];
+ if (_parent == null) return null;
+ return _parent.getSelected(package);
+ }
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698