Chromium Code Reviews| Index: components/scheduler/renderer/task_cost_estimator.cc |
| diff --git a/components/scheduler/renderer/task_cost_estimator.cc b/components/scheduler/renderer/task_cost_estimator.cc |
| new file mode 100644 |
| index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a806ec20fe38663bc69892cb73da6106407852ac |
| --- /dev/null |
| +++ b/components/scheduler/renderer/task_cost_estimator.cc |
| @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ |
| +// Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. |
| +// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
| +// found in the LICENSE file. |
| + |
| +#include "components/scheduler/renderer/task_cost_estimator.h" |
| + |
| +namespace scheduler { |
| + |
| +TaskCostEstimator::TaskCostEstimator(int sample_count, |
| + double estimation_percentile) |
| + : rolling_time_delta_history_(sample_count), |
| + outstanding_task_count_(0), |
| + estimation_percentile_(estimation_percentile) {} |
| + |
| +TaskCostEstimator::~TaskCostEstimator() {} |
| + |
| +void TaskCostEstimator::WillProcessTask(const base::PendingTask& pending_task) { |
| + // Avoid measuring the duration in nested run loops. |
| + if (++outstanding_task_count_ == 1) |
|
alex clarke (OOO till 29th)
2015/08/21 17:56:46
Ack nested loops, we need a test sorry ;)
Sami
2015/08/21 18:14:42
Agreed, bane of my existence, done.
|
| + task_start_time_ = base::TimeTicks::Now(); |
| +} |
| + |
| +void TaskCostEstimator::DidProcessTask(const base::PendingTask& pending_task) { |
| + if (--outstanding_task_count_ == 0) { |
| + base::TimeDelta duration = base::TimeTicks::Now() - task_start_time_; |
| + rolling_time_delta_history_.InsertSample(duration); |
| + |
| + // TODO(skyostil): Should we do this less often? |
| + expected_task_duration_ = |
| + rolling_time_delta_history_.Percentile(estimation_percentile_); |
| + } |
| +} |
| + |
| +} // namespace scheduler |