Chromium Code Reviews| Index: documentation/nonsfi_mode_async_signals.txt |
| diff --git a/documentation/nonsfi_mode_async_signals.txt b/documentation/nonsfi_mode_async_signals.txt |
| new file mode 100644 |
| index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11f76b679f5959677c474f39c01daf127e5df3f0 |
| --- /dev/null |
| +++ b/documentation/nonsfi_mode_async_signals.txt |
| @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ |
| +Async signals support in Non-SFI mode |
| +===================================== |
| + |
| +Issue: https://code.google.com/p/nativeclient/issues/detail?id=4065 |
| + |
| +This provides a way to asynchronously interrupt another thread in the same |
| +process, in a similar fashion to POSIX signals. Signal support is limited to |
| +Non-SFI mode (see nacl_irt_async_signal_handling in src/untrusted/irt/irt.h). |
| + |
| +Async signals have several differences from POSIX signals: |
| + |
| +* Synchronous signals (from hardware exceptions) are separate and their behavior |
| + is not changed. Furthermore, synchronous signals cannot be handled with this |
| + interface. |
| +* There is a single type of signal, and only a single, global async signal |
| + handler is supported. This means that there is no support for POSIX signal |
| + numbers. |
| +* There is no way to block signals, not even when the signal handler is running. |
| +* There is no equivalent to sigaltstack(), so the signal handler always runs on |
| + the same stack as the thread. |
| +* We don't provide libc wrapper functions for this interface in libnacl at the |
| + moment. If full POSIX support is needed, it can be implemented in user code, |
| + on top of the IRT interfaces provided. |
| +* NaCl signals are not intended to abort any in-process operations (such as |
| + syscalls, IRT calls or PPAPI calls) and they will restart once the signal |
| + handler returns. There are two exceptions that will be interrupted and do |
| + fail with EINTR: |
| + * futex_wait_abs() with a non-NULL timeout |
| + * nanosleep() |
| + |
| +Similar to POSIX signals, NaCl signals are delivered the next time the thread is |
| +scheduled to run but before giving the process control of execution. This also |
| +means that if several signals are sent to a thread before it is scheduled to |
| +run, a single async signal will be delivered, and the signal handler will be run |
| +just once. That also means that the signal handler can run at any point during |
| +the program execution, so the signal handler must be written with care to avoid |
| +doing unsafe operations, such as acquiring mutexes that may be held by the |
| +interrupted thread. Invoking any unsafe operation from within a signal handler |
| +is undefined. NaCl only guarantees that the following IRT interfaces are |
| +async-signal-safe and can be called from within the signal handler: |
| + |
| +* tls_get() |
| +* futex_wait_abs() |
| +* futex_wake() |
| +* send_async_signal() |
| + |
| +In order to deliver signals to the correct thread, a new version of the |
| +nacl_irt_thread IRT functions has been introduced which will assign an opaque |
| +thread identifier to each new thread and will populate it into the |child_tid| |
| +parameter. Since the initial thread is not created using nacl_irt_thread, the |
| +constant NACL_IRT_MAIN_THREAD_TID can be used to refer to it. This thread |
| +identifier can be used as a parameter to send_async_signal(). Providing an |
| +invalid thread identifier that is not NACL_IRT_MAIN_THREAD_TID, was not obtained |
| +from thread_create, or refers to a thread that has already exited will make |
| +send_async_signal() fail with ESRCH. Using the ID of a thread that has exited |
|
Mark Seaborn
2015/08/20 21:42:35
Saying it *will* fail with ESRCH is also technical
Luis Héctor Chávez
2015/08/20 21:50:54
Done.
|
| +might result in sending the signal to the wrong thread, if the ID is reused for |
| +a new thread. |