[Android] Start requiring Google Play services 7.8

[Android] Start requiring Google Play services 7.8

It is contained in the SDK manager package google_play_services
version 26. Running hooks/gyp/gn will check the local version
and prompt to run the update if it is needed.

BUG=491280, 477059
Committed: https://crrev.com/0c50961006cd76b2a20f445a6f296535664e777d
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#343862}

[dgn, 2015-08-14 14:48:02]

dgn@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ cjhopman@chromium.org, hinoka@google.com

[dgn, 2015-08-14 14:48:02]

cjhopman@: PTAL. This will make the bots pick up the new zip running 7.8 sdk
that was pushed yesterday. Devs will see a message looking like "Error while
checking Android SDK extras versions. Version 26 or greater is required for the
package "extra-google-google_play_services". Version 25 found. Please run
build/install-android-sdks.sh to update it." when running gyp

hinoka@: I uploaded the v26 zip to the cloud storage. Is there anything special
I need to do before I submit this patch and the bots start using it?

[dgn, 2015-08-14 15:37:51]

dgn@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ scottmg@chromium.org

[dgn, 2015-08-14 15:37:51]

scottmg@: PTAL. For more context, this builds up on changes related to
crbug.com/490091

[scottmg, 2015-08-14 15:57:27]

On 2015/08/14 15:37:51, dgn wrote:
> scottmg@: PTAL. For more context, this builds up on changes related to
> crbug.com/490091

I will leave this to Chris as he's more familiar with Android.

[dgn, 2015-08-14 16:07:34]

dgn@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ jbudorick@chromium.org

[dgn, 2015-08-14 16:07:34]

I think today is Chris' last day on chrome, which is why I sent it to you. Do
you know which reviewer would be recommended then? jbudorick@ maybe? He reviewed
some related code in build/android but is not owner of build/

[jbudorick, 2015-08-14 16:14:29]

On 2015/08/14 at 16:07:34, dgn wrote:
> I think today is Chris' last day on chrome, which is why I sent it to you. Do
you know which reviewer would be recommended then? jbudorick@ maybe? He reviewed
some related code in build/android but is not owner of build/

Yeah, I'd be happy to review this. I'll need to read up on the context a bit,
though, and I obviously can't provide OWNERS.

[scottmg, 2015-08-14 16:41:44]

On 2015/08/14 16:14:29, jbudorick wrote:
> On 2015/08/14 at 16:07:34, dgn wrote:
> > I think today is Chris' last day on chrome, which is why I sent it to you.
Do
> you know which reviewer would be recommended then? jbudorick@ maybe? He
reviewed
> some related code in build/android but is not owner of build/
> 
> Yeah, I'd be happy to review this. I'll need to read up on the context a bit,
> though, and I obviously can't provide OWNERS.

Ah, sorry to hear you're leaving Chris. :)

John, please feel free to send a CL to add yourself to build/OWNERS. It's a very
broad (and sometimes subtle) directory, so we just try to redirect reviews to
the person who has the most familiarity.

[dgn, 2015-08-14 17:17:08]

On 2015/08/14 16:41:44, scottmg wrote:
> On 2015/08/14 16:14:29, jbudorick wrote:
> > On 2015/08/14 at 16:07:34, dgn wrote:
> > > I think today is Chris' last day on chrome, which is why I sent it to you.
> Do
> > you know which reviewer would be recommended then? jbudorick@ maybe? He
> reviewed
> > some related code in build/android but is not owner of build/
> > 
> > Yeah, I'd be happy to review this. I'll need to read up on the context a
bit,
> > though, and I obviously can't provide OWNERS.
> 
> Ah, sorry to hear you're leaving Chris. :)
> 
> John, please feel free to send a CL to add yourself to build/OWNERS. It's a
very
> broad (and sometimes subtle) directory, so we just try to redirect reviews to
> the person who has the most familiarity.

Or maybe we should start moving android specific things to build/android?

[Yaron, 2015-08-17 18:56:56]

On 2015/08/14 17:17:08, dgn wrote:
> On 2015/08/14 16:41:44, scottmg wrote:
> > On 2015/08/14 16:14:29, jbudorick wrote:
> > > On 2015/08/14 at 16:07:34, dgn wrote:
> > > > I think today is Chris' last day on chrome, which is why I sent it to
you.
> > Do
> > > you know which reviewer would be recommended then? jbudorick@ maybe? He
> > reviewed
> > > some related code in build/android but is not owner of build/
> > > 
> > > Yeah, I'd be happy to review this. I'll need to read up on the context a
> bit,
> > > though, and I obviously can't provide OWNERS.
> > 
> > Ah, sorry to hear you're leaving Chris. :)
> > 
> > John, please feel free to send a CL to add yourself to build/OWNERS. It's a
> very
> > broad (and sometimes subtle) directory, so we just try to redirect reviews
to
> > the person who has the most familiarity.
> 
> Or maybe we should start moving android specific things to build/android?

Is there anything blocking this other than a formal approval from OWNER? We have
an invalidation changed blocked on this roll

[jbudorick, 2015-08-17 18:57:28]

On 2015/08/17 at 18:56:56, yfriedman wrote:
> On 2015/08/14 17:17:08, dgn wrote:
> > On 2015/08/14 16:41:44, scottmg wrote:
> > > On 2015/08/14 16:14:29, jbudorick wrote:
> > > > On 2015/08/14 at 16:07:34, dgn wrote:
> > > > > I think today is Chris' last day on chrome, which is why I sent it to
you.
> > > Do
> > > > you know which reviewer would be recommended then? jbudorick@ maybe? He
> > > reviewed
> > > > some related code in build/android but is not owner of build/
> > > > 
> > > > Yeah, I'd be happy to review this. I'll need to read up on the context a
> > bit,
> > > > though, and I obviously can't provide OWNERS.
> > > 
> > > Ah, sorry to hear you're leaving Chris. :)
> > > 
> > > John, please feel free to send a CL to add yourself to build/OWNERS. It's
a
> > very
> > > broad (and sometimes subtle) directory, so we just try to redirect reviews
to
> > > the person who has the most familiarity.
> > 
> > Or maybe we should start moving android specific things to build/android?
> 
> Is there anything blocking this other than a formal approval from OWNER? We
have an invalidation changed blocked on this roll

I'm looking at it. Just want to make sure everything's ok on the GCS side.

[jbudorick, 2015-08-17 19:04:33]

lgtm

[dgn, 2015-08-17 19:13:41]

On 2015/08/17 19:04:33, jbudorick wrote:
> lgtm

Thanks! I'll commit tomorrow morning, so that I have time to fix problems before
the US wakes up and starts committing like crazy.

[dgn, 2015-08-17 19:14:13]

On 2015/08/17 19:13:41, dgn wrote:
> On 2015/08/17 19:04:33, jbudorick wrote:
> > lgtm
> 
> Thanks! I'll commit tomorrow morning, so that I have time to fix problems
before
> the US wakes up and starts committing like crazy.

*eventual problems (everything should be fine!)

[dgn, 2015-08-18 08:46:23]

The CQ bit was checked by dgn@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-08-18 08:46:35]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1292753002/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1292753002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-08-18 08:59:41]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-08-18 09:00:24]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/0c50961006cd76b2a20f445a6f296535664e777d
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#343862}