| Index: docs/LanguageSpecification.md
|
| diff --git a/docs/LanguageSpecification.md b/docs/LanguageSpecification.md
|
| index 4dedd132aa8fa410fbe0efbbab5e1a69b06ec814..0c9b0c89b0e40a9ecf8bf09a8918249106936c1d 100644
|
| --- a/docs/LanguageSpecification.md
|
| +++ b/docs/LanguageSpecification.md
|
| @@ -1,10 +1,4 @@
|
| -# GYP (Generate Your Projects) Language Specification
|
| -
|
| -Status: Draft (as of 2009-01-30)
|
| -
|
| -Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org> _et al._
|
| -
|
| -Modified: 2009-02-10
|
| +# Language Specification
|
|
|
| [TOC]
|
|
|
| @@ -397,25 +391,9 @@ file formats as follows:
|
| * `SolutionProperties`:
|
| * `NestedProjects`:
|
|
|
| -## Code Location
|
| -
|
| -Here! http://gyp.googlecode.com/
|
| -
|
| -## Group Members
|
| -
|
| -|:-----------------|:---------------------------------|
|
| -| Darin Fisher | Overall approval of final design |
|
| -| Elliot Glaysher | Approval of Linux build functionality. |
|
| -| Alex Harper | |
|
| -| Steven Knight | Language specification.<br />Code for generating Scons files from `.gyp` files. |
|
| -| Mark Mentovai | Input language design and implementation.<br />Code for generating Xcode files from `.gyp` files.<br />Approval of Mac (Xcode) build functionality. |
|
| -| Bradley Nelson | Code for generating Visual Studio files from `.gyp` files. |
|
| -| Randall Spangler | |
|
| -| Nicolas Sylvain | Approval of Windows build functionality. |
|
| -
|
| ## Caveats
|
|
|
| -TODO(sgk): Notes/Question from very first prototype draft of the language.
|
| +Notes/Question from very first prototype draft of the language.
|
| Make sure these issues are addressed somewhere before deleting.
|
|
|
| * Libraries are easy, application abstraction is harder
|
| @@ -445,31 +423,3 @@ Make sure these issues are addressed somewhere before deleting.
|
| * Purify / Valgrind
|
| * Will everyone upgrade VS at once?
|
| * What does a dylib dependency mean?
|
| -
|
| -## Testing Plan
|
| -
|
| -_What are the sub-units of your system that will be independently testable?
|
| -Tests must be approved by the code reviewer, and must follow the guidelines in
|
| -the unittesting document as far as possible. See What Is A Design Document for
|
| -criteria for whole system tests on servers. If there are changes envisaged in
|
| -your future work, would your tests verify the base functionality? If some of
|
| -your tests cannot be easily automated (e.g. UI tests), how will you document
|
| -the needed special procedures?_
|
| -
|
| -## Documentation Plan
|
| -
|
| -Documentation via this wiki: http://code.google.com/p/gyp
|
| -
|
| -## Work Estimates
|
| -
|
| -_Estimates of how long each phase will take (please be detailed; subtask
|
| -granularity should be roughly one week)_
|
| -
|
| -## Launch Plans
|
| -
|
| -_What are the launch plans for your project? This includes, but is not limited
|
| -to:
|
| - * What visible changes your project will cause on the site.
|
| - * What will be the impact on production and/or search partners.
|
| - * What new servers will be introduced.
|
| - * Rough timeline for releasing your project._
|
|
|