Chromium Code Reviews| OLD | NEW |
|---|---|
| (Empty) | |
| 1 # Copyright (c) 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. | |
| 2 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be | |
| 3 # found in the LICENSE file. | |
| 4 { | |
| 5 'variables': { | |
| 6 'chromium_code': 1, | |
| 7 'package_name': 'multiple_proguard', | |
| 8 }, | |
| 9 'targets': [ | |
| 10 { | |
| 11 'target_name': 'multiple_proguards_test_apk', | |
| 12 'type': 'none', | |
| 13 'variables': { | |
| 14 'app_manifest_version_name%': '<(android_app_version_name)', | |
| 15 'app_manifest_version_code%': '<(android_app_version_code)', | |
|
cjhopman
2013/03/29 14:43:46
You shouldn't need the app_manifest_version* varia
jayjang
2013/03/29 15:05:19
Done.
| |
| 16 'java_in_dir': '../multiple_proguards', | |
|
cjhopman
2013/03/29 14:43:46
change this to:
'java_in_dir': 'src',
jayjang
2013/03/29 15:05:19
it couldn't be 'src'. In fact it searches manifest
| |
| 17 'proguard_enabled': 'true', | |
| 18 'proguard_flags_paths': [ | |
| 19 '<(DEPTH)/build/android/tests/multiple_proguards/proguard1.flags', | |
|
cjhopman
2013/03/29 14:43:46
These paths can be relative to this directory, i.e
jayjang
2013/03/29 15:05:19
Done.
| |
| 20 '<(DEPTH)/build/android/tests/multiple_proguards/proguard2.flags', | |
| 21 ], | |
| 22 'R_package': 'dummy', | |
| 23 'R_package_relpath': 'dummy', | |
|
cjhopman
2013/03/29 14:43:46
I don't think you need these R_package* variables
jayjang
2013/03/29 15:05:19
Unfortunately it's required because some variables
| |
| 24 'apk_name': 'MultipleProguards', | |
| 25 }, | |
| 26 'dependencies': [ | |
| 27 # guava has references to objects using reflection which | |
| 28 # should be ignored in proguard step. | |
| 29 '../../../../third_party/guava/guava.gyp:guava_javalib', | |
| 30 ], | |
| 31 'includes': [ '../../../../build/java_apk.gypi' ], | |
| 32 }, | |
| 33 ], | |
| 34 } | |
| OLD | NEW |