Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(95)

Unified Diff: src/preparser.h

Issue 1286383005: Parse arrow functions at proper precedence level (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8@master
Patch Set: Add test Created 5 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « src/pattern-rewriter.cc ('k') | src/prettyprinter.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: src/preparser.h
diff --git a/src/preparser.h b/src/preparser.h
index 18fc2330eedd7f646683035bba73e311d6f8d12a..d0229ec2b7119f2a2a44f9b07f92971d2e671351 100644
--- a/src/preparser.h
+++ b/src/preparser.h
@@ -1308,6 +1308,10 @@ class PreParserFactory {
return PreParserExpression::Spread(expression);
}
+ PreParserExpression NewEmptyParentheses(int pos) {
+ return PreParserExpression::Default();
+ }
+
// Return the object itself as AstVisitor and implement the needed
// dummy method right in this class.
PreParserFactory* visitor() { return this; }
@@ -2262,38 +2266,36 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParsePrimaryExpression(ExpressionClassifier* classifier,
}
BindingPatternUnexpectedToken(classifier);
Consume(Token::LPAREN);
- if (allow_harmony_arrow_functions() && Check(Token::RPAREN)) {
- // As a primary expression, the only thing that can follow "()" is "=>".
+ if (Check(Token::RPAREN)) {
+ // ()=>x. The continuation that looks for the => is in
+ // ParseAssignmentExpression.
+ classifier->RecordExpressionError(scanner()->location(),
+ MessageTemplate::kUnexpectedToken,
+ Token::String(Token::RPAREN));
classifier->RecordBindingPatternError(scanner()->location(),
MessageTemplate::kUnexpectedToken,
Token::String(Token::RPAREN));
- // Give a good error to the user who might have typed e.g. "return();".
- if (peek() != Token::ARROW) {
- ReportUnexpectedTokenAt(scanner_->peek_location(), peek(),
- MessageTemplate::kMissingArrow);
+ result = factory()->NewEmptyParentheses(beg_pos);
+ } else if (allow_harmony_rest_parameters() && Check(Token::ELLIPSIS)) {
+ // (...x)=>x. The continuation that looks for the => is in
+ // ParseAssignmentExpression.
+ int ellipsis_pos = scanner()->location().beg_pos;
+ classifier->RecordExpressionError(scanner()->location(),
+ MessageTemplate::kUnexpectedToken,
+ Token::String(Token::ELLIPSIS));
+ Scanner::Location expr_loc = scanner()->peek_location();
+ Token::Value tok = peek();
+ result =
rossberg 2015/08/20 16:50:00 Nit: unnecessary line break?
wingo 2015/08/21 09:50:48 Done.
+ this->ParseAssignmentExpression(true, classifier, CHECK_OK);
+ // Patterns not allowed as rest parameters. There is no way we can
rossberg 2015/08/20 16:50:00 Nit: insert "are". FWIW, Microsoft just proposed
wingo 2015/08/21 09:50:49 Done.
+ // succeed so go ahead and use the convenient ReportUnexpectedToken
+ // interface.
+ if (!Traits::IsIdentifier(result)) {
+ ReportUnexpectedTokenAt(expr_loc, tok);
*ok = false;
return this->EmptyExpression();
}
- Scope* scope =
- this->NewScope(scope_, ARROW_SCOPE, FunctionKind::kArrowFunction);
- FormalParametersT parameters(scope);
- scope->set_start_position(beg_pos);
- ExpressionClassifier args_classifier;
- result = this->ParseArrowFunctionLiteral(parameters, args_classifier,
- CHECK_OK);
- } else if (allow_harmony_arrow_functions() &&
- allow_harmony_rest_parameters() && Check(Token::ELLIPSIS)) {
- // (...x) => y
- Scope* scope =
- this->NewScope(scope_, ARROW_SCOPE, FunctionKind::kArrowFunction);
- FormalParametersT formals(scope);
- scope->set_start_position(beg_pos);
- ExpressionClassifier formals_classifier;
- formals.has_rest = true;
- this->ParseFormalParameter(&formals, &formals_classifier, CHECK_OK);
- Traits::DeclareFormalParameter(
- formals.scope, formals.at(0), formals.is_simple,
- &formals_classifier);
+ result = factory()->NewSpread(result, ellipsis_pos);
if (peek() == Token::COMMA) {
ReportMessageAt(scanner()->peek_location(),
MessageTemplate::kParamAfterRest);
@@ -2301,8 +2303,6 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParsePrimaryExpression(ExpressionClassifier* classifier,
return this->EmptyExpression();
}
Expect(Token::RPAREN, CHECK_OK);
- result = this->ParseArrowFunctionLiteral(formals, formals_classifier,
- CHECK_OK);
} else {
// Heuristically try to detect immediately called functions before
// seeing the call parentheses.
@@ -2864,6 +2864,12 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParseAssignmentExpression(bool accept_IN,
return expression;
}
+ // It could be that ParseConditionalExpression returned EmptyParentheses if it
+ // saw () but we didn't see a => afterward. This is a sufficiently rare case
+ // that we should probably make sure it results in an exception and sets OK to
+ // false.
+ // ValidateExpression(&arrow_formals_classifier, CHECK_OK);
rossberg 2015/08/20 16:50:00 Hm?
wingo 2015/08/21 09:50:48 A vestige of a previous patch, oops! Removed.
+
// "expression" was not itself an arrow function parameter list, but it might
// form part of one. Propagate speculative formal parameter error locations.
classifier->Accumulate(arrow_formals_classifier,
« no previous file with comments | « src/pattern-rewriter.cc ('k') | src/prettyprinter.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698