Linux: Depend on liberation-fonts package.

Linux: Depend on liberation-fonts package.

Without these fonts, text in the built-in PDF viewer may not display correctly.

BUG=369991
Committed: https://crrev.com/8f7b33b2f79917f2cb2f1df9f926575c070dbae1
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#342645}

[Lei Zhang, 2015-08-08 00:54:41]

thestig@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ mmoss@chromium.org

[Lei Zhang, 2015-08-08 00:54:42]

Basing this off of:

https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/ (see Distribution section)
http://software.opensuse.org/package/liberation-fonts
http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/fonts-liberation
https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/fonts-liberation

[Michael Moss, 2015-08-10 16:41:40]

lgtm

(Also, would be nice if the CL summary mentioned something like "used by
pdfviewer", so people coming across this later don't need to dig into the bug to
figure that out).

[Lei Zhang, 2015-08-10 17:29:42]

On 2015/08/10 16:41:40, Michael Moss wrote:
> lgtm
> 
> (Also, would be nice if the CL summary mentioned something like "used by
> pdfviewer", so people coming across this later don't need to dig into the bug
to
> figure that out).

Done.

[Lei Zhang, 2015-08-10 17:29:46]

The CQ bit was checked by thestig@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-08-10 17:30:29]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1283543004/1
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1283543004/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-08-10 17:40:38]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-08-10 17:41:25]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/8f7b33b2f79917f2cb2f1df9f926575c070dbae1
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#342645}

[Lei Zhang, 2015-08-11 16:37:18]

A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in
https://codereview.chromium.org/1286743002/ by thestig@chromium.org.

The reason for reverting is: The liberation-fonts package on Fedora is a lie.
See https://crbug.com/519322.

[Michael Moss, 2015-08-11 16:40:38]

On 2015/08/11 16:37:18, Lei Zhang wrote:
> A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in
> https://codereview.chromium.org/1286743002/ by mailto:thestig@chromium.org.
> 
> The reason for reverting is: The liberation-fonts package on Fedora is a lie.
> See https://crbug.com/519322.

Is it worth keeping it enabled for Debian?

[Lei Zhang, 2015-08-11 16:51:04]

On 2015/08/11 16:40:38, Michael Moss wrote:
> On 2015/08/11 16:37:18, Lei Zhang wrote:
> > A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in
> > https://codereview.chromium.org/1286743002/ by mailto:thestig@chromium.org.
> > 
> > The reason for reverting is: The liberation-fonts package on Fedora is a
lie.
> > See https://crbug.com/519322.
> 
> Is it worth keeping it enabled for Debian?

Sure. I'll re-examine the RPM situation and see if we can still do both.

[Lei Zhang, 2015-08-11 18:36:26]

On 2015/08/11 16:51:04, Lei Zhang wrote:
> Sure. I'll re-examine the RPM situation and see if we can still do both.

(For those following along at home) The next try is
https://codereview.chromium.org/1274043004/