Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2443)

Unified Diff: cc/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc

Issue 12774006: cc: Chromify Layer and LayerImpl classes. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: MoreAndroidCompilings Created 7 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « cc/picture_layer_impl.cc ('k') | cc/quad_culler.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: cc/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc
diff --git a/cc/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc b/cc/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc
index 9e06ed6020583d5fd708d65b3da47b11f80c0864..4de10220d501864a8ab314754aef8e607f59936f 100644
--- a/cc/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc
+++ b/cc/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ namespace {
class TestablePictureLayerImpl : public PictureLayerImpl {
public:
- static scoped_ptr<TestablePictureLayerImpl> create(
+ static scoped_ptr<TestablePictureLayerImpl> Create(
LayerTreeImpl* treeImpl,
int id,
scoped_refptr<PicturePileImpl> pile)
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class TestablePictureLayerImpl : public PictureLayerImpl {
scoped_refptr<PicturePileImpl> pile)
: PictureLayerImpl(treeImpl, id) {
pile_ = pile;
- setBounds(pile_->size());
+ SetBounds(pile_->size());
CreateTilingSet();
}
};
@@ -185,8 +185,8 @@ class PictureLayerImplTest : public testing::Test {
pending_tree->DetachLayerTree();
scoped_ptr<TestablePictureLayerImpl> pending_layer =
- TestablePictureLayerImpl::create(pending_tree, id_, pile);
- pending_layer->setDrawsContent(true);
+ TestablePictureLayerImpl::Create(pending_tree, id_, pile);
+ pending_layer->SetDrawsContent(true);
pending_tree->SetRootLayer(pending_layer.PassAs<LayerImpl>());
}
@@ -206,10 +206,10 @@ class PictureLayerImplTest : public testing::Test {
void SetContentsScaleOnBothLayers(float scale, bool animating_transform) {
float result_scale_x, result_scale_y;
gfx::Size result_bounds;
- pending_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ pending_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
scale, animating_transform,
&result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
- active_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ active_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
scale, animating_transform,
&result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
}
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ class PictureLayerImplTest : public testing::Test {
host_impl_.activeTree()->SetPageScaleFactorAndLimits(1.f, 1.f, 1.f);
float result_scale_x, result_scale_y;
gfx::Size result_bounds;
- active_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ active_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
1.f, false, &result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
// Add 1x1 rects at the centers of each tile, then re-record pile contents
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ TEST_F(PictureLayerImplTest, ManageTilingsWithNoRecording) {
host_impl_.setDeviceScaleFactor(1.f);
host_impl_.pendingTree()->SetPageScaleFactorAndLimits(1.f, 1.f, 1.f);
- pending_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ pending_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
1.f, false, &result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
EXPECT_EQ(0u, pending_layer_->tilings().num_tilings());
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ TEST_F(PictureLayerImplTest, ManageTilingsCreatesTilings) {
host_impl_.setDeviceScaleFactor(1.7f);
host_impl_.pendingTree()->SetPageScaleFactorAndLimits(3.2f, 3.2f, 3.2f);
- pending_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ pending_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
1.3f, false, &result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
ASSERT_EQ(2u, pending_layer_->tilings().num_tilings());
EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ TEST_F(PictureLayerImplTest, ManageTilingsCreatesTilings) {
// If we change the layer's CSS scale factor, then we should not get new
// tilings.
- pending_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ pending_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
1.8f, false, &result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
ASSERT_EQ(2u, pending_layer_->tilings().num_tilings());
EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ TEST_F(PictureLayerImplTest, ManageTilingsCreatesTilings) {
// If we change the page scale factor, then we should get new tilings.
host_impl_.pendingTree()->SetPageScaleFactorAndLimits(2.2f, 2.2f, 2.2f);
- pending_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ pending_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
1.8f, false, &result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
ASSERT_EQ(4u, pending_layer_->tilings().num_tilings());
EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ TEST_F(PictureLayerImplTest, ManageTilingsCreatesTilings) {
// If we change the device scale factor, then we should get new tilings.
host_impl_.setDeviceScaleFactor(1.4f);
- pending_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ pending_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
1.9f, false, &result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
ASSERT_EQ(6u, pending_layer_->tilings().num_tilings());
EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ TEST_F(PictureLayerImplTest, ManageTilingsCreatesTilings) {
host_impl_.setDeviceScaleFactor(2.2f);
host_impl_.pendingTree()->SetPageScaleFactorAndLimits(1.4f, 1.4f, 1.4f);
- pending_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ pending_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
1.9f, false, &result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
ASSERT_EQ(6u, pending_layer_->tilings().num_tilings());
EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ TEST_F(PictureLayerImplTest, CleanUpTilings) {
ASSERT_EQ(4u, active_layer_->tilings().num_tilings());
// Now move the ideal scale to 1.1 on the active layer. Our target stays 1.2.
- active_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ active_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
1.1f, false, &result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
// Because the pending layer's ideal scale is still 1.0, our tilings fall
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ TEST_F(PictureLayerImplTest, CleanUpTilings) {
// Move the ideal scale on the pending layer to 1.1 as well. Our target stays
// 1.2 still.
- pending_layer_->calculateContentsScale(
+ pending_layer_->CalculateContentsScale(
1.1f, false, &result_scale_x, &result_scale_y, &result_bounds);
// Our 1.0 tiling now falls outside the range between our ideal scale and our
« no previous file with comments | « cc/picture_layer_impl.cc ('k') | cc/quad_culler.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698