Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(231)

Unified Diff: content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_unittest.cc

Issue 1268453003: Remove GetPendingSiteInstance from NavigationControllerDelegate. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Remove delegate method Created 5 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_unittest.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_unittest.cc b/content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_unittest.cc
index d50994083b71e60041a080173b033964469a0011..a5082e4756186768bd2927d65ac1f34e7ebb0584 100644
--- a/content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_unittest.cc
+++ b/content/browser/frame_host/navigation_controller_impl_unittest.cc
@@ -2793,15 +2793,11 @@ TEST_F(NavigationControllerTest, RestoreNavigate) {
EXPECT_FALSE(our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->site_instance());
// After navigating, we should have one entry, and it should be "pending".
- // It should now have a SiteInstance and no restore_type.
our_controller.GoToIndex(0);
EXPECT_EQ(1, our_controller.GetEntryCount());
EXPECT_EQ(our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0),
our_controller.GetPendingEntry());
EXPECT_EQ(0, our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->GetPageID());
- EXPECT_EQ(NavigationEntryImpl::RESTORE_NONE,
- our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->restore_type());
Charlie Reis 2015/07/29 23:58:27 We still need this to be set to RESTORE_NONE at so
Fabrice (no longer in Chrome) 2015/07/30 15:59:26 I'm removing the check here, and restoring the che
- EXPECT_TRUE(our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->site_instance());
// Timestamp should remain the same before the navigation finishes.
EXPECT_EQ(timestamp, our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->GetTimestamp());
@@ -2830,8 +2826,6 @@ TEST_F(NavigationControllerTest, RestoreNavigate) {
EXPECT_EQ(
url,
our_controller.GetLastCommittedEntry()->site_instance()->GetSiteURL());
- EXPECT_EQ(NavigationEntryImpl::RESTORE_NONE,
- our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->restore_type());
Charlie Reis 2015/07/29 23:58:27 We definitely need this check.
Fabrice (no longer in Chrome) 2015/07/30 15:59:26 Yes, sorry. Done.
// Timestamp should have been updated.
EXPECT_GE(our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->GetTimestamp(), timestamp);
@@ -2870,15 +2864,11 @@ TEST_F(NavigationControllerTest, RestoreNavigateAfterFailure) {
EXPECT_FALSE(our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->site_instance());
// After navigating, we should have one entry, and it should be "pending".
- // It should now have a SiteInstance and no restore_type.
our_controller.GoToIndex(0);
EXPECT_EQ(1, our_controller.GetEntryCount());
EXPECT_EQ(our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0),
our_controller.GetPendingEntry());
EXPECT_EQ(0, our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->GetPageID());
- EXPECT_EQ(NavigationEntryImpl::RESTORE_NONE,
- our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->restore_type());
- EXPECT_TRUE(our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->site_instance());
// This pending navigation may have caused a different navigation to fail,
// which causes the pending entry to be cleared.
@@ -2914,8 +2904,6 @@ TEST_F(NavigationControllerTest, RestoreNavigateAfterFailure) {
EXPECT_EQ(
url,
our_controller.GetLastCommittedEntry()->site_instance()->GetSiteURL());
- EXPECT_EQ(NavigationEntryImpl::RESTORE_NONE,
- our_controller.GetEntryAtIndex(0)->restore_type());
}
// Make sure that the page type and stuff is correct after an interstitial.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698