Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(168)

Unified Diff: runtime/vm/profiler_test.cc

Issue 1264523002: Fix bad inclusive ticks for functions on release x64 (Closed) Base URL: git@github.com:dart-lang/sdk.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « runtime/vm/profiler_service.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: runtime/vm/profiler_test.cc
diff --git a/runtime/vm/profiler_test.cc b/runtime/vm/profiler_test.cc
index 9b6cfaf4fa63eb19b42e84d068a5d47950930efa..2ef65e910593954756df188059cdc3f5be522365 100644
--- a/runtime/vm/profiler_test.cc
+++ b/runtime/vm/profiler_test.cc
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ TEST_CASE(Profiler_CodeTicks) {
Profile profile(isolate);
AllocationFilter filter(isolate, class_a.id());
profile.Build(&filter, Profile::kNoTags);
- // We should have one allocation sample.
+ // We should have three allocation samples.
EXPECT_EQ(3, profile.sample_count());
ProfileTrieWalker walker(&profile);
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ TEST_CASE(Profiler_FunctionTicks) {
Profile profile(isolate);
AllocationFilter filter(isolate, class_a.id());
profile.Build(&filter, Profile::kNoTags);
- // We should have one allocation sample.
+ // We should have three allocation samples.
EXPECT_EQ(3, profile.sample_count());
ProfileTrieWalker walker(&profile);
« no previous file with comments | « runtime/vm/profiler_service.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698