SIMD.js: Update Float32x4 and tests to current spec.

SIMD.js: Update Float32x4 and tests to current spec.

LOG=N
BUG=v8:4124
Committed: https://crrev.com/5d8c1054280f514579b8a9468e6d0a4929745c8c
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29781}

[bbudge, 2015-07-20 23:39:39]

bbudge@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ rossberg@chromium.org

[bbudge, 2015-07-20 23:39:40]

https://codereview.chromium.org/1239423004/diff/1/src/harmony-simd.js
File src/harmony-simd.js (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1239423004/diff/1/src/harmony-simd.js#newcode87
src/harmony-simd.js:87: DONT_ENUM | READ_ONLY);
This was different from almost every other 'symbolToStringTag', by not adding
the property to the prototype. I hope it's correct now.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1239423004/diff/1/test/simdjs/testcfg.py
File test/simdjs/testcfg.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1239423004/diff/1/test/simdjs/testcfg.py#newc...
test/simdjs/testcfg.py:17: SIMDJS_ARCHIVE_REVISION =
"631f1ebf046e60e67138c21bdafdf8624903d87b"
I'll have to update this since the current polyfill fails because it calls
Object.hasOwnProperty incorrectly. That should land soon.

https://codereview.chromium.org/1239423004/diff/1/test/simdjs/testcfg.py#newc...
test/simdjs/testcfg.py:67: 
Incorporating some changes from Brad Nelson's CL to fix SIMD.js test and
polyfill downloading. This shouldn't be a part of the final patch. Here and
below.

[bbudge, 2015-07-21 00:37:21]

https://codereview.chromium.org/1239423004/diff/1/test/simdjs/testcfg.py
File test/simdjs/testcfg.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1239423004/diff/1/test/simdjs/testcfg.py#newc...
test/simdjs/testcfg.py:67: 
On 2015/07/20 23:39:40, bbudge wrote:
> Incorporating some changes from Brad Nelson's CL to fix SIMD.js test and
> polyfill downloading. This shouldn't be a part of the final patch. Here and
> below.

Brad's CL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1240453003/

[rossberg, 2015-07-21 10:21:41]

lgtm

[bbudge, 2015-07-22 02:35:21]

Patchset #5 (id:80001) has been deleted

[bbudge, 2015-07-22 02:43:07]

The CQ bit was checked by bbudge@chromium.org

[bbudge, 2015-07-22 02:43:08]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from
rossberg@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1239423004/#ps100001
(title: "Skip tests that haven't been updated to new spec.")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-22 02:43:16]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1239423004/100001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-22 03:14:00]

Committed patchset #5 (id:100001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-22 03:14:20]

Patchset 5 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/5d8c1054280f514579b8a9468e6d0a4929745c8c
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29781}

[Michael Achenbach, 2015-07-23 08:29:32]

machenbach@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ bradnelson@chromium.org, machenbach@chromium.org

[Michael Achenbach, 2015-07-23 08:29:33]

Could you remove the now failing tests also from the benchmarks, e.g.:
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/v8/test/simdjs/Sim...

Here is an internal link to the failures:
https://chromegw.corp.google.com/i/internal.client.v8/builders/v8_linux64_perf_2

[bbudge, 2015-07-23 11:17:49]

On 2015/07/23 08:29:33, Michael Achenbach wrote:
> Could you remove the now failing tests also from the benchmarks, e.g.:
>
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/v8/test/simdjs/Sim...
> 
> Here is an internal link to the failures:
>
https://chromegw.corp.google.com/i/internal.client.v8/builders/v8_linux64_perf_2

The link to the failures is broken for me.

[Michael Achenbach, 2015-07-23 21:08:39]

On 2015/07/23 11:17:49, bbudge wrote:
> On 2015/07/23 08:29:33, Michael Achenbach wrote:
> > Could you remove the now failing tests also from the benchmarks, e.g.:
> >
>
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/v8/test/simdjs/Sim...
> > 
> > Here is an internal link to the failures:
> >
>
https://chromegw.corp.google.com/i/internal.client.v8/builders/v8_linux64_perf_2
> 
> The link to the failures is broken for me.

Try this:
https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/internal.client.v8/builders/v8_linux64...