[DevTools] Do not report edited resources via Page.getResourceContent.

Source/core/inspector/InspectorPageAgent.cpp

Index: Source/core/inspector/InspectorPageAgent.cpp
diff --git a/Source/core/inspector/InspectorPageAgent.cpp b/Source/core/inspector/InspectorPageAgent.cpp
index 20b4717cdac2daf20cd702876ed8996ba0f6dbc9..9f403f4f1248b887114bd80099c3a397d2624fcf 100644
--- a/Source/core/inspector/InspectorPageAgent.cpp
+++ b/Source/core/inspector/InspectorPageAgent.cpp
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ void InspectorPageAgent::getResourceContentAfterResourcesContentLoaded(const Str
 void InspectorPageAgent::getResourceContent(ErrorString* errorString, const String& frameId, const String& url, PassRefPtrWillBeRawPtr<GetResourceContentCallback> callback)
 {
     String content;
-    if (m_debuggerAgent->getEditedScript(url, &content) || m_cssAgent->getEditedStyleSheet(url, &content)) {
+    if (m_cssAgent->getEditedStyleSheet(url, &content)) {

[pfeldman, 2015/07/22 04:16:14]

Could you explain why we would treat CSS and JS differently? It used to be
consistent, now it is not. The clients of this API (should there be any), should
agree on whether they receive original content of the resource or the edited
one. After your change, they can't commit to either of the models.

It might be that extensions API are not affected due to being migrated to
UISourceCodes, but still, it introduces a nasty inconsistency and does not seem
to improve things.

         callback->sendSuccess(content, false);
         return;
     }