Add test of crypto.getRandomValues.

tests/html/crypto_test.dart

Index: tests/html/crypto_test.dart
diff --git a/tests/html/crypto_test.dart b/tests/html/crypto_test.dart
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0f8fc666c463779f7debd8549701abd9258ff65
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/html/crypto_test.dart
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2013, the Dart project authors.  Please see the AUTHORS file
+// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
+// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+library crypto_test;
+import '../../pkg/unittest/lib/unittest.dart';
+import '../../pkg/unittest/lib/html_config.dart';
+import 'dart:html';
+
+main() {
+  useHtmlConfiguration();

[Anton Muhin, 2013/02/21 12:40:43]

please, use useHtmlIndividualConfiguration

[Mads Ager (google), 2013/02/21 13:38:57]

But then I have to use 'group', right. And since I only have three small tests
which would fit in the same group, I'm not sure it buys us anything?

Pete, do you have any recommendations on that?

+
+  test('exists', () {
+    var crypto = window.crypto;
+    expect(crypto is Crypto, isTrue);
+  });
+
+  test('successful call', () {
+    var crypto = window.crypto;
+    var data = new Uint8Array(100);
+    expect(data.every((e) => e == 0), isTrue);
+    crypto.getRandomValues(data);
+    // In theory this is flaky. However, in practice you will get 100 zeroes
+    // in a row from a cryptographically secure random number generator so
+    // rarely that we don't have to worry about it.
+    expect(data.any((e) => e != 0), isTrue);
+  });
+
+  test('type mismatch', () {
+    var crypto = window.crypto;
+    var data = new Float32Array(100);
+    expect(() {
+      crypto.getRandomValues(data);
+    }, throws, reason: "Only typed array views with integer types allowed");

[Anton Muhin, 2013/02/21 12:40:43]

nit: ' instead of ", please

[Mads Ager (google), 2013/02/21 13:38:57]

Done.

+  });
+}