Revert of bindings: Makes almost all attributes accessor-type properties.

Revert of bindings: Makes almost all attributes accessor-type properties. (patchset #11 id:200001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1193793003/)

Reason for revert:
This causes failures in content_browsertests, e.g.:

http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/Linux%20Tests/builds/45398

I verified that this was the issue via 'git bisect' on linux; it should be trivial to reproduce.

Sorry!

Original issue's description:
> bindings: Makes almost all attributes accessor-type properties.
> 
> Introduces |attribute.is_data_type_property| as a
> template variable to specify the property type.
> 
> is_data_type_property is true only for
> - attributes of Window interface
>   just because we'd like to move on step by step.
>   We'll make Window's attributes accessor-type
>   in a following CL.
> - constructors
>   which must be implemented as methods rather than
>   attributes.  This is another task.
> 
> is_data_type_property will be gone once we resolve
> the above two cases.
> 
> Note that we need an undesired hack in {HTML,XML}Document.idl
> because v8::Template::SetAccessorProperty doesn't support
> inheriting accessors on InstanceTemplate.
> 
> BUG=43394, 491006
> 
> Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=198687

TBR=haraken@chromium.org,bashi@chromium.org,yukishiino@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=43394, 491006
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=198698

[Dirk Pranke, 2015-07-10 17:09:13]

Created Revert of bindings: Makes almost all attributes accessor-type
properties.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-10 17:09:33]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1226203012/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-07-10 17:10:11]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=198698

[haraken, 2015-07-11 00:46:18]

LGTM, thanks for the revert!

[Yuki, 2015-07-13 04:17:08]

On 2015/07/11 00:46:18, haraken wrote:
> LGTM, thanks for the revert!

lgtm.  Thanks!