Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(855)

Unified Diff: lss/linux_syscall_support.h

Issue 12181007: add x32 ABI support (Closed) Base URL: http://linux-syscall-support.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
Patch Set: Created 7 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: lss/linux_syscall_support.h
===================================================================
--- lss/linux_syscall_support.h (revision 17)
+++ lss/linux_syscall_support.h (working copy)
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stddef.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/resource.h>
@@ -1753,6 +1754,15 @@
return res;
}
#elif defined(__x86_64__)
+ /* x32 has 32bit longs, but the syscall interface is 64bit */
+ #ifdef __ILP32__
+ #define LSS_SC_ARG(a) (sizeof(a) == 8 ? \
Mark Seaborn 2013/02/28 17:46:53 "SC" is rather cryptic. Maybe "LSS_SYSCALL_ARG" i
vapier 2013/02/28 21:51:48 Done.
+ (unsigned long long)(a) : \
+ (unsigned long long)(uintptr_t)(a))
Mark Seaborn 2013/02/28 17:46:53 I don't understand why you have a double cast here
vapier 2013/02/28 21:51:48 on x32, pointers are 32bit. syscall args are 64bi
Mark Seaborn 2013/03/01 23:15:40 I don't think using ?: is going to protect you fro
vapier 2013/03/01 23:21:49 sure, i didn't mean to indicate it does entirely s
Mark Seaborn 2013/03/04 16:52:44 Having extra code that only reduces the number of
+ #else
+ #define LSS_SC_ARG(a) (long)(a)
Mark Seaborn 2013/02/28 17:46:53 Should this be "((long)(a))"?
vapier 2013/02/28 21:51:48 it could be. in practice it doesn't matter. i'll
+ #endif
+
/* There are no known problems with any of the _syscallX() macros
* currently shipping for x86_64, but we still need to be able to define
* our own version so that we can override the location of the errno
@@ -1793,7 +1803,7 @@
#endif
#undef LSS_BODY
#define LSS_BODY(type,name, ...) \
- long __res; \
+ long long __res; \
__asm__ __volatile__(LSS_ENTRYPOINT \
: "=a" (__res) : "0" (__NR_##name), \
##__VA_ARGS__ : "r11", "rcx", "memory"); \
@@ -1806,18 +1816,18 @@
#undef _syscall1
#define _syscall1(type,name,type1,arg1) \
type LSS_NAME(name)(type1 arg1) { \
- LSS_BODY(type, name, "D" ((long)(arg1))); \
+ LSS_BODY(type, name, "D" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg1))); \
}
#undef _syscall2
#define _syscall2(type,name,type1,arg1,type2,arg2) \
type LSS_NAME(name)(type1 arg1, type2 arg2) { \
- LSS_BODY(type, name, "D" ((long)(arg1)), "S" ((long)(arg2))); \
+ LSS_BODY(type, name, "D" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg1)), "S" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg2))); \
}
#undef _syscall3
#define _syscall3(type,name,type1,arg1,type2,arg2,type3,arg3) \
type LSS_NAME(name)(type1 arg1, type2 arg2, type3 arg3) { \
- LSS_BODY(type, name, "D" ((long)(arg1)), "S" ((long)(arg2)), \
- "d" ((long)(arg3))); \
+ LSS_BODY(type, name, "D" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg1)), "S" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg2)), \
+ "d" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg3))); \
}
#undef _syscall4
#define _syscall4(type,name,type1,arg1,type2,arg2,type3,arg3,type4,arg4) \
@@ -1825,8 +1835,9 @@
long __res; \
__asm__ __volatile__("movq %5,%%r10;" LSS_ENTRYPOINT : \
"=a" (__res) : "0" (__NR_##name), \
- "D" ((long)(arg1)), "S" ((long)(arg2)), "d" ((long)(arg3)), \
- "r" ((long)(arg4)) : "r10", "r11", "rcx", "memory"); \
+ "D" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg1)), "S" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg2)), \
+ "d" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg3)), "r" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg4)) \
+ : "r10", "r11", "rcx", "memory"); \
LSS_RETURN(type, __res); \
}
#undef _syscall5
@@ -1837,9 +1848,9 @@
long __res; \
__asm__ __volatile__("movq %5,%%r10; movq %6,%%r8;" LSS_ENTRYPOINT :\
"=a" (__res) : "0" (__NR_##name), \
- "D" ((long)(arg1)), "S" ((long)(arg2)), "d" ((long)(arg3)), \
- "r" ((long)(arg4)), "r" ((long)(arg5)) : \
- "r8", "r10", "r11", "rcx", "memory"); \
+ "D" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg1)), "S" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg2)), \
+ "d" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg3)), "r" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg4)), \
+ "r" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg5)) : "r8", "r10", "r11", "rcx", "memory"); \
LSS_RETURN(type, __res); \
}
#undef _syscall6
@@ -1851,9 +1862,10 @@
__asm__ __volatile__("movq %5,%%r10; movq %6,%%r8; movq %7,%%r9;" \
LSS_ENTRYPOINT : \
"=a" (__res) : "0" (__NR_##name), \
- "D" ((long)(arg1)), "S" ((long)(arg2)), "d" ((long)(arg3)), \
- "r" ((long)(arg4)), "r" ((long)(arg5)), "r" ((long)(arg6)) : \
- "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11", "rcx", "memory"); \
+ "D" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg1)), "S" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg2)), \
+ "d" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg3)), "r" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg4)), \
+ "r" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg5)), "r" (LSS_SC_ARG(arg6)) : "r8", "r9", \
+ "r10", "r11", "rcx", "memory"); \
LSS_RETURN(type, __res); \
}
LSS_INLINE int LSS_NAME(clone)(int (*fn)(void *), void *child_stack,
@@ -1922,9 +1934,10 @@
"1:\n"
: "=a" (__res)
: "0"(-EINVAL), "i"(__NR_clone), "i"(__NR_exit),
- "r"(fn), "S"(child_stack), "D"(flags), "r"(arg),
- "d"(parent_tidptr), "r"(newtls),
- "r"(child_tidptr)
+ "r"(LSS_SC_ARG(fn)), "S"(LSS_SC_ARG(child_stack)),
Mark Seaborn 2013/02/28 17:46:53 Line is >80 characters. Please put the arguments
vapier 2013/02/28 21:51:48 Done.
+ "D"(LSS_SC_ARG(flags)), "r"(LSS_SC_ARG(arg)),
+ "d"(LSS_SC_ARG(parent_tidptr)), "r"(LSS_SC_ARG(newtls)),
Mark Seaborn 2013/02/28 17:46:53 Same here.
vapier 2013/02/28 21:51:48 Done.
+ "r"(LSS_SC_ARG(child_tidptr))
: "rsp", "memory", "r8", "r10", "r11", "rcx");
}
LSS_RETURN(int, __res);
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698