Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(3)

Unified Diff: trunk/src/base/threading/thread_local_storage_win.cc

Issue 121393002: Revert 241657 "Implement chromium's TLS." (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/
Patch Set: Created 7 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « trunk/src/base/threading/thread_local_storage_posix.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: trunk/src/base/threading/thread_local_storage_win.cc
===================================================================
--- trunk/src/base/threading/thread_local_storage_win.cc (revision 242548)
+++ trunk/src/base/threading/thread_local_storage_win.cc (working copy)
@@ -8,35 +8,201 @@
#include "base/logging.h"
+
+namespace {
+// In order to make TLS destructors work, we need to keep function
+// pointers to the destructor for each TLS that we allocate.
+// We make this work by allocating a single OS-level TLS, which
+// contains an array of slots for the application to use. In
+// parallel, we also allocate an array of destructors, which we
+// keep track of and call when threads terminate.
+
+// g_native_tls_key is the one native TLS that we use. It stores our table.
+long g_native_tls_key = TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES;
+
+// g_last_used_tls_key is the high-water-mark of allocated thread local storage.
+// Each allocation is an index into our g_tls_destructors[]. Each such index is
+// assigned to the instance variable slot_ in a ThreadLocalStorage::Slot
+// instance. We reserve the value slot_ == 0 to indicate that the corresponding
+// instance of ThreadLocalStorage::Slot has been freed (i.e., destructor called,
+// etc.). This reserved use of 0 is then stated as the initial value of
+// g_last_used_tls_key, so that the first issued index will be 1.
+long g_last_used_tls_key = 0;
+
+// The maximum number of 'slots' in our thread local storage stack.
+const int kThreadLocalStorageSize = 64;
+
+// The maximum number of times to try to clear slots by calling destructors.
+// Use pthread naming convention for clarity.
+const int kMaxDestructorIterations = kThreadLocalStorageSize;
+
+// An array of destructor function pointers for the slots. If a slot has a
+// destructor, it will be stored in its corresponding entry in this array.
+// The elements are volatile to ensure that when the compiler reads the value
+// to potentially call the destructor, it does so once, and that value is tested
+// for null-ness and then used. Yes, that would be a weird de-optimization,
+// but I can imagine some register machines where it was just as easy to
+// re-fetch an array element, and I want to be sure a call to free the key
+// (i.e., null out the destructor entry) that happens on a separate thread can't
+// hurt the racy calls to the destructors on another thread.
+volatile base::ThreadLocalStorage::TLSDestructorFunc
+ g_tls_destructors[kThreadLocalStorageSize];
+
+void** ConstructTlsVector() {
+ if (g_native_tls_key == TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES) {
+ long value = TlsAlloc();
+ DCHECK(value != TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES);
+
+ // Atomically test-and-set the tls_key. If the key is TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES,
+ // go ahead and set it. Otherwise, do nothing, as another
+ // thread already did our dirty work.
+ if (TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES != InterlockedCompareExchange(
+ &g_native_tls_key, value, TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES)) {
+ // We've been shortcut. Another thread replaced g_native_tls_key first so
+ // we need to destroy our index and use the one the other thread got
+ // first.
+ TlsFree(value);
+ }
+ }
+ DCHECK(!TlsGetValue(g_native_tls_key));
+
+ // Some allocators, such as TCMalloc, make use of thread local storage.
+ // As a result, any attempt to call new (or malloc) will lazily cause such a
+ // system to initialize, which will include registering for a TLS key. If we
+ // are not careful here, then that request to create a key will call new back,
+ // and we'll have an infinite loop. We avoid that as follows:
+ // Use a stack allocated vector, so that we don't have dependence on our
+ // allocator until our service is in place. (i.e., don't even call new until
+ // after we're setup)
+ void* stack_allocated_tls_data[kThreadLocalStorageSize];
+ memset(stack_allocated_tls_data, 0, sizeof(stack_allocated_tls_data));
+ // Ensure that any rentrant calls change the temp version.
+ TlsSetValue(g_native_tls_key, stack_allocated_tls_data);
+
+ // Allocate an array to store our data.
+ void** tls_data = new void*[kThreadLocalStorageSize];
+ memcpy(tls_data, stack_allocated_tls_data, sizeof(stack_allocated_tls_data));
+ TlsSetValue(g_native_tls_key, tls_data);
+ return tls_data;
+}
+
+// Called when we terminate a thread, this function calls any TLS destructors
+// that are pending for this thread.
+void WinThreadExit() {
+ if (g_native_tls_key == TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES)
+ return;
+
+ void** tls_data = static_cast<void**>(TlsGetValue(g_native_tls_key));
+ // Maybe we have never initialized TLS for this thread.
+ if (!tls_data)
+ return;
+
+ // Some allocators, such as TCMalloc, use TLS. As a result, when a thread
+ // terminates, one of the destructor calls we make may be to shut down an
+ // allocator. We have to be careful that after we've shutdown all of the
+ // known destructors (perchance including an allocator), that we don't call
+ // the allocator and cause it to resurrect itself (with no possibly destructor
+ // call to follow). We handle this problem as follows:
+ // Switch to using a stack allocated vector, so that we don't have dependence
+ // on our allocator after we have called all g_tls_destructors. (i.e., don't
+ // even call delete[] after we're done with destructors.)
+ void* stack_allocated_tls_data[kThreadLocalStorageSize];
+ memcpy(stack_allocated_tls_data, tls_data, sizeof(stack_allocated_tls_data));
+ // Ensure that any re-entrant calls change the temp version.
+ TlsSetValue(g_native_tls_key, stack_allocated_tls_data);
+ delete[] tls_data; // Our last dependence on an allocator.
+
+ int remaining_attempts = kMaxDestructorIterations;
+ bool need_to_scan_destructors = true;
+ while (need_to_scan_destructors) {
+ need_to_scan_destructors = false;
+ // Try to destroy the first-created-slot (which is slot 1) in our last
+ // destructor call. That user was able to function, and define a slot with
+ // no other services running, so perhaps it is a basic service (like an
+ // allocator) and should also be destroyed last. If we get the order wrong,
+ // then we'll itterate several more times, so it is really not that
+ // critical (but it might help).
+ for (int slot = g_last_used_tls_key; slot > 0; --slot) {
+ void* value = stack_allocated_tls_data[slot];
+ if (value == NULL)
+ continue;
+ base::ThreadLocalStorage::TLSDestructorFunc destructor =
+ g_tls_destructors[slot];
+ if (destructor == NULL)
+ continue;
+ stack_allocated_tls_data[slot] = NULL; // pre-clear the slot.
+ destructor(value);
+ // Any destructor might have called a different service, which then set
+ // a different slot to a non-NULL value. Hence we need to check
+ // the whole vector again. This is a pthread standard.
+ need_to_scan_destructors = true;
+ }
+ if (--remaining_attempts <= 0) {
+ NOTREACHED(); // Destructors might not have been called.
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Remove our stack allocated vector.
+ TlsSetValue(g_native_tls_key, NULL);
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
namespace base {
-namespace internal {
+ThreadLocalStorage::Slot::Slot(TLSDestructorFunc destructor) {
+ initialized_ = false;
+ slot_ = 0;
+ Initialize(destructor);
+}
-bool PlatformThreadLocalStorage::AllocTLS(TLSKey* key) {
- TLSKey value = TlsAlloc();
- if (value != TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES) {
- *key = value;
- return true;
+bool ThreadLocalStorage::StaticSlot::Initialize(TLSDestructorFunc destructor) {
+ if (g_native_tls_key == TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES || !TlsGetValue(g_native_tls_key))
+ ConstructTlsVector();
+
+ // Grab a new slot.
+ slot_ = InterlockedIncrement(&g_last_used_tls_key);
+ DCHECK_GT(slot_, 0);
+ if (slot_ >= kThreadLocalStorageSize) {
+ NOTREACHED();
+ return false;
}
- return false;
+
+ // Setup our destructor.
+ g_tls_destructors[slot_] = destructor;
+ initialized_ = true;
+ return true;
}
-void PlatformThreadLocalStorage::FreeTLS(TLSKey key) {
- BOOL ret = TlsFree(key);
- DCHECK(ret);
+void ThreadLocalStorage::StaticSlot::Free() {
+ // At this time, we don't reclaim old indices for TLS slots.
+ // So all we need to do is wipe the destructor.
+ DCHECK_GT(slot_, 0);
+ DCHECK_LT(slot_, kThreadLocalStorageSize);
+ g_tls_destructors[slot_] = NULL;
+ slot_ = 0;
+ initialized_ = false;
}
-void* PlatformThreadLocalStorage::GetTLSValue(TLSKey key) {
- return TlsGetValue(key);
+void* ThreadLocalStorage::StaticSlot::Get() const {
+ void** tls_data = static_cast<void**>(TlsGetValue(g_native_tls_key));
+ if (!tls_data)
+ tls_data = ConstructTlsVector();
+ DCHECK_GT(slot_, 0);
+ DCHECK_LT(slot_, kThreadLocalStorageSize);
+ return tls_data[slot_];
}
-void PlatformThreadLocalStorage::SetTLSValue(TLSKey key, void* value) {
- BOOL ret = TlsSetValue(key, value);
- DCHECK(ret);
+void ThreadLocalStorage::StaticSlot::Set(void* value) {
+ void** tls_data = static_cast<void**>(TlsGetValue(g_native_tls_key));
+ if (!tls_data)
+ tls_data = ConstructTlsVector();
+ DCHECK_GT(slot_, 0);
+ DCHECK_LT(slot_, kThreadLocalStorageSize);
+ tls_data[slot_] = value;
}
-} // namespace internal
-
} // namespace base
// Thread Termination Callbacks.
@@ -67,7 +233,7 @@
// On XP SP0 & SP1, the DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH is never seen. It is sent on SP2+
// and on W2K and W2K3. So don't assume it is sent.
if (DLL_THREAD_DETACH == reason || DLL_PROCESS_DETACH == reason)
- base::internal::PlatformThreadLocalStorage::OnThreadExit();
+ WinThreadExit();
}
// .CRT$XLA to .CRT$XLZ is an array of PIMAGE_TLS_CALLBACK pointers that are
« no previous file with comments | « trunk/src/base/threading/thread_local_storage_posix.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698