Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1366)

Unified Diff: pkg/compiler/lib/src/js_backend/field_naming_mixin.dart

Issue 1209973002: dart2js: Extract minified field naming into mixin. (Closed) Base URL: git@github.com:dart-lang/sdk.git@master
Patch Set: Comments Created 5 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | pkg/compiler/lib/src/js_backend/js_backend.dart » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: pkg/compiler/lib/src/js_backend/field_naming_mixin.dart
diff --git a/pkg/compiler/lib/src/js_backend/field_naming_mixin.dart b/pkg/compiler/lib/src/js_backend/field_naming_mixin.dart
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..61383b92f79061dd0ec85957a729acfad1abe8e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pkg/compiler/lib/src/js_backend/field_naming_mixin.dart
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2015, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
+// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
+// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+part of js_backend;
+
+abstract class _MinifiedFieldNamer implements Namer {
+ _FieldNamingRegistry get fieldRegistry;
+
+ // Returns a minimal name for the field that is globally unique along
+ // the given element's class inheritance chain.
+ //
+ // The inheritance scope based naming might not yield a name. For instance,
+ // this could be because the field belongs to a mixin. In such a case this
+ // will return `null` and a normal field name has to be used.
+ jsAst.Name _minifiedInstanceFieldPropertyName(Element element) {
+ if (element.hasFixedBackendName) {
+ return new StringBackedName(element.fixedBackendName);
+ }
+
+ _FieldNamingScope names;
+ if (element is BoxFieldElement) {
+ names = new _FieldNamingScope.forBox(element.box, fieldRegistry);
+ } else {
+ ClassElement cls = element is ClosureFieldElement
+ ? element.closureClass
+ : element.enclosingClass;
+ names =
+ new _FieldNamingScope.forClass(cls, compiler.world, fieldRegistry);
+ }
+
+ if (names.containsField(element)) {
+ return names[element];
+ }
+ return null;
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Encapsulates the global state of field naming.
+ *
+ * The field naming registry allocates names to be used along a path in the
+ * inheritance hierarchy of fields, starting with the object class. The actual
+ * hierarchy is encoded using instances of [_FieldNamingScope].
+ */
+class _FieldNamingRegistry {
+ final MinifyNamer namer;
+
+ final Map<Entity, _FieldNamingScope> scopes =
+ new Map<Entity, _FieldNamingScope>();
+
+ final Map<Entity, jsAst.Name> globalNames = new Map<Entity, jsAst.Name>();
+
+ int globalCount = 0;
+
+ final List<jsAst.Name> nameStore = new List<jsAst.Name>();
+
+ _FieldNamingRegistry(this.namer);
+
+ // Returns the name to be used for a field with distance [index] from the
+ // root of the object hierarchy. The distance thereby is computed as the
+ // number of fields preceding the current field in its classes inheritance
+ // chain.
+ //
+ // The implementation assumes that names are requedsted in order, that is the
+ // name at position i+1 is requested after the name at position i was
+ // requested.
+ jsAst.Name getName(int index) {
+ if (index >= nameStore.length) {
+ // The namer usually does not use certain names as they clash with
+ // existing properties on JS objects (see [_reservedNativeProperties]).
+ // However, some of them are really short and safe to use for fields.
+ // Thus, we shortcut the namer to use those first.
+ assert(index == nameStore.length + 1);
+ if (index < MinifyNamer._reservedNativeProperties.length &&
+ MinifyNamer._reservedNativeProperties[index].length <= 2) {
+ nameStore.add(
+ new StringBackedName(MinifyNamer._reservedNativeProperties[index]));
+ } else {
+ nameStore.add(namer.getFreshName("field$index", namer.usedInstanceNames,
+ namer.suggestedInstanceNames));
+ }
+ }
+
+ return nameStore[index];
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * A [_FieldNamingScope] encodes a node in the inheritance tree of the current
+ * class hierarchy. The root node typically is the node corresponding to the
+ * `Object` class. It is used to assign a unique name to each field of a class.
+ * Unique here means unique wrt. all fields along the path back to the root.
+ * This is achieved at construction time via the [_fieldNameCounter] field that
+ * counts the number of fields on the path to the root node that have been
+ * encountered so far.
+ *
+ * Obviously, this only works if no fields are added to a parent node after its
+ * children have added their first field.
+ */
+class _FieldNamingScope {
+ final _FieldNamingScope superScope;
+ final Entity container;
+ final Map<Element, jsAst.Name> names = new Maplet<Element, jsAst.Name>();
+ final _FieldNamingRegistry registry;
+
+ /// Naming counter used for fields of ordinary classes.
+ int _fieldNameCounter;
+
+ /// The number of fields along the superclass chain that use inheritance
+ /// based naming, including the ones allocated for this scope.
+ int get inheritanceBasedFieldNameCounter => _fieldNameCounter;
+
+ /// The number of locally used fields. Depending on the naming source
+ /// (e.g. inheritance based or globally unique for mixixns) this
+ /// might be different from [inheritanceBasedFieldNameCounter].
+ int get _localFieldNameCounter => _fieldNameCounter;
+ void set _localFieldNameCounter(int val) {
+ _fieldNameCounter = val;
+ }
+
+ factory _FieldNamingScope.forClass(
+ ClassElement cls, ClassWorld world, _FieldNamingRegistry registry) {
+ _FieldNamingScope result = registry.scopes[cls];
+ if (result != null) return result;
+
+ if (world.isUsedAsMixin(cls)) {
+ result = new _MixinFieldNamingScope.mixin(cls, registry);
+ } else {
+ if (cls.superclass == null) {
+ result = new _FieldNamingScope.rootScope(cls, registry);
+ } else {
+ _FieldNamingScope superScope =
+ new _FieldNamingScope.forClass(cls.superclass, world, registry);
+ if (cls.isMixinApplication) {
+ result =
+ new _MixinFieldNamingScope.mixedIn(cls, superScope, registry);
+ } else {
+ result = new _FieldNamingScope.inherit(cls, superScope, registry);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ cls.forEachInstanceField((cls, field) => result.add(field));
+
+ registry.scopes[cls] = result;
+ return result;
+ }
+
+ factory _FieldNamingScope.forBox(Local box, _FieldNamingRegistry registry) {
+ return registry.scopes.putIfAbsent(
+ box, () => new _BoxFieldNamingScope(box, registry));
+ }
+
+ _FieldNamingScope.rootScope(this.container, this.registry)
+ : superScope = null,
+ _fieldNameCounter = 0;
+
+ _FieldNamingScope.inherit(this.container, this.superScope, this.registry) {
+ _fieldNameCounter = superScope.inheritanceBasedFieldNameCounter;
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Checks whether [name] is already used in the current scope chain.
+ */
+ _isNameUnused(jsAst.Name name) {
+ return !names.values.contains(name) &&
+ ((superScope == null) || superScope._isNameUnused(name));
+ }
+
+ jsAst.Name _nextName() => registry.getName(_localFieldNameCounter++);
+
+ jsAst.Name operator [](Element field) {
+ jsAst.Name name = names[field];
+ if (name == null && superScope != null) return superScope[field];
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ void add(Element field) {
+ if (names.containsKey(field)) return;
+
+ jsAst.Name value = _nextName();
+ assert(invariant(field, _isNameUnused(value)));
+ names[field] = value;
+ }
+
+ bool containsField(Element field) => names.containsKey(field);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Field names for mixins have two constraints: They need to be unique in the
+ * hierarchy of each application of a mixin and they need to be the same for
+ * all applications of a mixin. To achieve this, we use global naming for
+ * mixins from the same name pool as fields and add a `$` at the end to ensure
+ * they do not collide with normal field names. The `$` sign is typically used
+ * as a separator between method names and argument counts and does not appear
+ * in generated names themselves.
+ */
+class _MixinFieldNamingScope extends _FieldNamingScope {
+ int get _localFieldNameCounter => registry.globalCount;
+ void set _localFieldNameCounter(int val) {
+ registry.globalCount = val;
+ }
+
+ @override
+ Map<Entity, jsAst.Name> get names => registry.globalNames;
+
+ _MixinFieldNamingScope.mixin(ClassElement cls, _FieldNamingRegistry registry)
+ : super.rootScope(cls, registry);
+
+ _MixinFieldNamingScope.mixedIn(MixinApplicationElement container,
+ _FieldNamingScope superScope, _FieldNamingRegistry registry)
+ : super.inherit(container, superScope, registry);
+
+ jsAst.Name _nextName() {
+ jsAst.Name proposed = super._nextName();
+ return new CompoundName([proposed, Namer._literalDollar]);
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * [BoxFieldElement] fields work differently in that they do not belong to an
+ * actual class but an anonymous box associated to a [Local]. As there is no
+ * inheritance chain, we do not need to compute fields a priori but can assign
+ * names on the fly.
+ */
+class _BoxFieldNamingScope extends _FieldNamingScope {
+ _BoxFieldNamingScope(Local box, _FieldNamingRegistry registry)
+ : super.rootScope(box, registry);
+
+ @override
+ bool containsField(_) => true;
+
+ jsAst.Name operator [](Element field) {
+ if (!names.containsKey(field)) add(field);
+ return names[field];
+ }
+}
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | pkg/compiler/lib/src/js_backend/js_backend.dart » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698