| Index: services/asset_bundle/main.cc
|
| diff --git a/services/asset_bundle/main.cc b/services/asset_bundle/main.cc
|
| index ea59dd0aabb4b6e6b28a1d331f0af4239c72ba08..ce98693d890261c50a24f55fb5b0ab9b5be333a3 100644
|
| --- a/services/asset_bundle/main.cc
|
| +++ b/services/asset_bundle/main.cc
|
| @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
|
| // found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
| #include "base/macros.h"
|
| +#include "base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool.h"
|
| #include "mojo/application/application_runner_chromium.h"
|
| #include "mojo/public/c/system/main.h"
|
| #include "mojo/public/cpp/application/application_connection.h"
|
| @@ -29,9 +30,26 @@ class AssetBundleApp : public ApplicationDelegate,
|
| // |InterfaceFactory<AssetUnpacker>| implementation:
|
| void Create(ApplicationConnection* connection,
|
| InterfaceRequest<AssetUnpacker> request) override {
|
| - new AssetUnpackerImpl(request.Pass());
|
| + // Lazily initialize |sequenced_worker_pool_|. (We can't create it in the
|
| + // constructor, since AtExitManager is only created in
|
| + // ApplicationRunnerChromium::Run().)
|
| + if (!sequenced_worker_pool_) {
|
| + // TODO(vtl): What's the "right" way to choose the maximum number of
|
| + // threads?
|
| + sequenced_worker_pool_ =
|
| + new base::SequencedWorkerPool(4, "AssetBundleWorker");
|
| + }
|
| +
|
| + new AssetUnpackerImpl(
|
| + request.Pass(),
|
| + sequenced_worker_pool_->GetTaskRunnerWithShutdownBehavior(
|
| + base::SequencedWorkerPool::SKIP_ON_SHUTDOWN));
|
| }
|
|
|
| + // We don't really need the "sequenced" part, but we need to be able to shut
|
| + // down our worker pool.
|
| + scoped_refptr<base::SequencedWorkerPool> sequenced_worker_pool_;
|
| +
|
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(AssetBundleApp);
|
| };
|
|
|
|
|