base: Convert scoped_arrays to the new scoped_ptr style.

base/callback_internal.h

Index: base/callback_internal.h
diff --git a/base/callback_internal.h b/base/callback_internal.h
index d9aba39fc37f8411ec018338e2d6bf396fd7c2c2..254ec7c9280b5b2302a3da18822e520b4ec4749f 100644
--- a/base/callback_internal.h
+++ b/base/callback_internal.h
@@ -137,9 +137,9 @@ struct CallbackParamTraits<scoped_ptr<T, D> > {
 };
 
 template <typename T>
-struct CallbackParamTraits<scoped_array<T> > {
-  typedef scoped_array<T> ForwardType;
-  typedef scoped_array<T> StorageType;
+struct CallbackParamTraits<scoped_ptr<T[]> > {

[awong, 2013/01/16 18:56:06]

Does this compile?

If we make this change, we remove support for for scoped_array<> from Bind(). 
Are there no users of scoped_array & Bind() in chromium?

[tfarina, 2013/01/16 19:00:28]

I compiled only base_unittests.
I'll revert those changes for now.

+  typedef scoped_ptr<T[]> ForwardType;
+  typedef scoped_ptr<T[]> StorageType;
 };
 
 template <typename T, typename R>
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ template <typename T, typename D>
 scoped_ptr<T, D> CallbackForward(scoped_ptr<T, D>& p) { return p.Pass(); }
 
 template <typename T>
-scoped_array<T> CallbackForward(scoped_array<T>& p) { return p.Pass(); }
+scoped_ptr<T[]> CallbackForward(scoped_ptr<T[]>& p) { return p.Pass(); }
 
 template <typename T, typename R>
 scoped_ptr_malloc<T, R> CallbackForward(scoped_ptr_malloc<T, R>& p) {