Enable slimming paint for all layout tests

Enable slimming paint for all layout tests

BUG=497950
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=197532

[Xianzhu, 2015-06-20 16:03:02]

wangxianzhu@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ chrishtr@chromium.org, wkorman@chromium.org

[Xianzhu, 2015-06-20 16:03:02]

Please see try results of patch set 3 for expectation changes (all about border
joint anti-aliasing).

[wkorman, 2015-06-20 18:54:29]

On 2015/06/20 at 16:03:02, wangxianzhu wrote:
> Please see try results of patch set 3 for expectation changes (all about
border joint anti-aliasing).

From:

https://storage.googleapis.com/chromium-layout-test-archives/mac_blink_rel/59...

- is the latest on the joint anti-aliasing that there are some differences, but
we're fine with them as is?

- http/tests/misc/acid2-pixel.html actually looks better to me now, is that
expected?

- are the inspector/tracing failures flakes? Text diffs, ex:
  inspector/tracing/timeline-bound-function.html

[Xianzhu, 2015-06-20 19:00:30]

On 2015/06/20 18:54:29, wkorman wrote:
> On 2015/06/20 at 16:03:02, wangxianzhu wrote:
> > Please see try results of patch set 3 for expectation changes (all about
> border joint anti-aliasing).
> 
> From:
> 
>
https://storage.googleapis.com/chromium-layout-test-archives/mac_blink_rel/59...
> 
> - is the latest on the joint anti-aliasing that there are some differences,
but
> we're fine with them as is?
>

Yes. They are because of our change about border anti-aliasing in sp mode (made
by fmalita@). Actually most of the rebaselines during migration are because of
this reason.
 
> - http/tests/misc/acid2-pixel.html actually looks better to me now, is that
> expected?

Yes the same reason.

> 
> - are the inspector/tracing failures flakes? Text diffs, ex:
>   inspector/tracing/timeline-bound-function.html

Yes. Normally if you see http/ inspector/ tests fail and succeed on
mac_blink_rel or win_blink_rel, they are flakes.

[wkorman, 2015-06-20 19:01:54]

lgtm

[wkorman, 2015-06-20 19:02:49]

On 2015/06/20 at 19:01:54, wkorman wrote:
> lgtm

This is very exciting! Appreciate all of your focused work on these LayoutTests
past days.

[Xianzhu, 2015-06-20 19:09:49]

The CQ bit was checked by wangxianzhu@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-20 19:09:59]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1195953002/60001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-20 19:12:58]

Committed patchset #4 (id:60001) as
https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=197532