Remove FT_HAS_COLOR definition.

Remove FT_HAS_COLOR definition.

The intent was to define FT_HAS_COLOR when building with a pre
2.5.1 version of FreeType for forward compatibility. However,
the definition here is wrong and also never used.

Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/1e23736f59f64b88b595cec488352bcc0b3b8406

[bungeman-skia, 2015-06-18 17:41:26]

The CQ bit was checked by bungeman@google.com to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-18 17:41:42]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1178943009/1

[bungeman-skia, 2015-06-18 17:41:54]

bungeman@google.com changed reviewers:
+ djsollen@google.com, mtklein@google.com

[bungeman-skia, 2015-06-18 17:41:54]

Remove the dead code.

[djsollen, 2015-06-18 17:43:27]

lgtm

[mtklein, 2015-06-18 17:44:20]

lgtm.  What's wrong with that definition?

[bungeman-skia, 2015-06-18 17:46:49]

On 2015/06/18 17:44:20, mtklein wrote:
> lgtm.  What's wrong with that definition?

It's always false (at compile time) so if you compile with an older FreeType
you'll just keep getting false even if you have a newer FreeType at runtime. (It
should be checking a bit in a bitfield.)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-18 17:47:09]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-18 17:47:10]

Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.

[bungeman-skia, 2015-06-18 17:47:18]

The CQ bit was checked by bungeman@google.com

[mtklein, 2015-06-18 17:47:20]

On 2015/06/18 17:47:10, commit-bot: I haz the power wrote:
> Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.

Ooh, gotcha.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-18 17:47:34]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1178943009/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-18 17:48:12]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/1e23736f59f64b88b595cec488352bcc0b3b8406