Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(531)

Unified Diff: src/preparser.h

Issue 1178523002: Support rest parameters in arrow functions (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8@master
Patch Set: Add test for duplicate formal param detection Created 5 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: src/preparser.h
diff --git a/src/preparser.h b/src/preparser.h
index 263e16aab8910925dec24d3ac121710344fb3929..5be0527f84a805324866289d30a387f734462e66 100644
--- a/src/preparser.h
+++ b/src/preparser.h
@@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@ class PreParserTraits {
V8_INLINE void ParseArrowFunctionFormalParameters(
Scope* scope, PreParserExpression expression,
- const Scanner::Location& params_loc, bool* is_rest,
+ const Scanner::Location& params_loc, bool* has_rest,
Scanner::Location* duplicate_loc, bool* ok);
struct TemplateLiteralState {};
@@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ PreParserExpression PreParserTraits::SpreadCallNew(PreParserExpression function,
void PreParserTraits::ParseArrowFunctionFormalParameters(
Scope* scope, PreParserExpression params,
- const Scanner::Location& params_loc, bool* is_rest,
+ const Scanner::Location& params_loc, bool* has_rest,
Scanner::Location* duplicate_loc, bool* ok) {
// TODO(wingo): Detect duplicated identifiers in paramlists. Detect parameter
// lists that are too long.
@@ -2159,6 +2159,24 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParsePrimaryExpression(ExpressionClassifier* classifier,
bool has_rest = false;
result = this->ParseArrowFunctionLiteral(scope, has_rest,
args_classifier, CHECK_OK);
+ } else if (allow_harmony_arrow_functions() &&
+ allow_harmony_rest_params() && Check(Token::ELLIPSIS)) {
+ // (...x) => y
+ Scope* scope =
+ this->NewScope(scope_, ARROW_SCOPE, FunctionKind::kArrowFunction);
+ scope->set_start_position(beg_pos);
+ ExpressionClassifier args_classifier;
+ const bool has_rest = true;
+ this->ParseFormalParameter(scope, has_rest, &args_classifier, CHECK_OK);
+ if (peek() == Token::COMMA) {
+ ReportMessageAt(scanner()->peek_location(),
+ MessageTemplate::kParamAfterRest);
+ *ok = false;
+ return this->EmptyExpression();
+ }
+ Expect(Token::RPAREN, CHECK_OK);
+ result = this->ParseArrowFunctionLiteral(scope, has_rest,
+ args_classifier, CHECK_OK);
} else {
// Heuristically try to detect immediately called functions before
// seeing the call parentheses.
@@ -2239,11 +2257,29 @@ typename ParserBase<Traits>::ExpressionT ParserBase<Traits>::ParseExpression(
this->ParseAssignmentExpression(accept_IN, &binding_classifier, CHECK_OK);
classifier->Accumulate(binding_classifier,
ExpressionClassifier::AllProductions);
- while (peek() == Token::COMMA) {
- Expect(Token::COMMA, CHECK_OK);
+ bool seen_rest = false;
+ while (Check(Token::COMMA)) {
+ if (seen_rest) {
+ // Seeing the first rest param meant that this form wasn't a valid
+ // expression or pattern. Now we know it's not a valid formal parameter
+ // list either.
+ ReportMessageAt(scanner()->peek_location(),
rossberg 2015/06/10 13:43:53 Nit: Should this really be an eager error here? It
caitp (gmail) 2015/06/10 14:30:49 We should mark it in the expression classifier ins
+ MessageTemplate::kParamAfterRest);
+ *ok = false;
+ return this->EmptyExpression();
+ }
+ if (allow_harmony_rest_params() && Check(Token::ELLIPSIS)) {
+ // 'x, y, ...z' in CoverParenthesizedExpressionAndArrowParameterList only
+ // as the formal parameters of'(x, y, ...z) => foo', and is not itself a
+ // valid expression or binding pattern.
+ ExpressionUnexpectedToken(classifier);
+ BindingPatternUnexpectedToken(classifier);
+ seen_rest = true;
+ }
int pos = position();
ExpressionT right = this->ParseAssignmentExpression(
accept_IN, &binding_classifier, CHECK_OK);
+ if (seen_rest) right = factory()->NewSpread(right, pos);
classifier->Accumulate(binding_classifier,
ExpressionClassifier::AllProductions);
result = factory()->NewBinaryOperation(Token::COMMA, result, right, pos);
@@ -2671,7 +2707,6 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParseAssignmentExpression(bool accept_IN,
}
ExpressionT expression = this->ParseConditionalExpression(
accept_IN, &arrow_formals_classifier, CHECK_OK);
- classifier->Accumulate(arrow_formals_classifier);
if (allow_harmony_arrow_functions() && peek() == Token::ARROW) {
checkpoint.Restore();
@@ -2679,11 +2714,11 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParseAssignmentExpression(bool accept_IN,
ValidateArrowFormalParameters(&arrow_formals_classifier, expression,
CHECK_OK);
Scanner::Location loc(lhs_location.beg_pos, scanner()->location().end_pos);
- bool has_rest = false;
Scope* scope =
this->NewScope(scope_, ARROW_SCOPE, FunctionKind::kArrowFunction);
scope->set_start_position(lhs_location.beg_pos);
Scanner::Location duplicate_loc = Scanner::Location::invalid();
+ bool has_rest = false;
this->ParseArrowFunctionFormalParameters(scope, expression, loc, &has_rest,
&duplicate_loc, CHECK_OK);
if (duplicate_loc.IsValid()) {
@@ -2698,7 +2733,8 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParseAssignmentExpression(bool accept_IN,
// "expression" was not itself an arrow function parameter list, but it might
// form part of one. Propagate speculative formal parameter error locations.
classifier->Accumulate(arrow_formals_classifier,
- ExpressionClassifier::FormalParametersProductions);
+ ExpressionClassifier::StandardProductions |
+ ExpressionClassifier::FormalParametersProductions);
if (!Token::IsAssignmentOp(peek())) {
if (fni_ != NULL) fni_->Leave();

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698