Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(383)

Issue 1173353003: Unittest fixes. (Closed)

Created:
5 years, 6 months ago by John
Modified:
5 years, 6 months ago
CC:
native-client-reviews_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/native_client/pnacl-subzero.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/heads/master
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 4

Patch Set 2 : Optional runTest() ParseError parameter. #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+27 lines, -26 lines) Patch
M unittest/BitcodeMunge.h View 1 1 chunk +4 lines, -6 lines 0 comments Download
M unittest/BitcodeMunge.cpp View 1 2 chunks +3 lines, -6 lines 0 comments Download
M unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp View 1 15 chunks +20 lines, -14 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 9 (2 generated)
John
5 years, 6 months ago (2015-06-11 18:39:00 UTC) #2
Jim Stichnoth
https://codereview.chromium.org/1173353003/diff/1/unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp File unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1173353003/diff/1/unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp#newcode60 unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp:60: EXPECT_EQ("\t.type\t__Sz_block_profile_info,@object\n" Can you factor this string into a const ...
5 years, 6 months ago (2015-06-11 19:07:14 UTC) #3
Karl
https://codereview.chromium.org/1173353003/diff/1/unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp File unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1173353003/diff/1/unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp#newcode59 unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp:59: EXPECT_FALSE(Munger.runTest()); Why not add an (optional) flag to runTest() ...
5 years, 6 months ago (2015-06-11 19:58:54 UTC) #5
John
https://codereview.chromium.org/1173353003/diff/1/unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp File unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1173353003/diff/1/unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp#newcode59 unittest/IceParseInstsTest.cpp:59: EXPECT_FALSE(Munger.runTest()); On 2015/06/11 19:58:54, Karl wrote: > Why not ...
5 years, 6 months ago (2015-06-11 20:42:09 UTC) #6
Karl
lgtm
5 years, 6 months ago (2015-06-11 20:52:59 UTC) #7
Jim Stichnoth
LGTM, except I'd prefer different var names than ParseError.
5 years, 6 months ago (2015-06-11 20:57:27 UTC) #8
John
5 years, 6 months ago (2015-06-11 22:14:41 UTC) #9
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #2 (id:20001) manually as
8eefffade3f1a44af97ad0824328ff0910dcee5e (presubmit successful).

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698