Implement %TypedArray%.prototype.slice

Implement %TypedArray%.prototype.slice

The initial implementation of this method takes a couple shortcuts:
- At some points in the spec, we should be making a reference to
  "Table 49" and instead do property lookup on the constructor.
  This is an issue with some other TypedArray methods too.
- The spec indicates that, if constructor and @@species haven't been
  messed with in particular ways, then there should be a memcpy
  from the old to the new. That fast path is not implemented here
  in this patch, but because V8 doesn't canonicalize NaN, the result
  isn't observably different.

BUG=v8:3578
LOG=Y
R=arv

Committed: https://crrev.com/51df8df9bef4913559d6a356e26ed2596ba1509f
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28882}

[arv (Not doing code reviews), 2015-06-08 23:57:12]

LGTM

I'm not sure how to test Set throwing? I don't see how it can throw?

https://codereview.chromium.org/1170023002/diff/1/src/harmony-typedarray.js
File src/harmony-typedarray.js (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1170023002/diff/1/src/harmony-typedarray.js#n...
src/harmony-typedarray.js:351: // does this throw?
If you make this function strict you should get the exception as needed.

[dehrenberg, 2015-06-09 18:18:35]

The CQ bit was checked by dehrenberg@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-09 18:18:51]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1170023002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-09 19:40:48]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-06-09 19:41:09]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/51df8df9bef4913559d6a356e26ed2596ba1509f
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28882}

[Michael Achenbach, 2015-06-10 07:06:59]

machenbach@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ machenbach@chromium.org

[Michael Achenbach, 2015-06-10 07:06:59]

Something is missing in the build deps. The builder that built this CL made the
external snapshot (including the experimental libraries):
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20-%20builder/bui...

@vogelheim, yangguo: There was no linking of d8, guess that is expected? Still,
something is missing since the tests failed (e.g.
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64/builds/3799) and a
full rebuild in the next commit solved the problem.