Added new driver for chromoting.

remoting/test/chromoting_test_driver.cc

Index: remoting/test/chromoting_test_driver.cc
diff --git a/remoting/test/chromoting_test_driver.cc b/remoting/test/chromoting_test_driver.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c47cb58f3dca1f07e2653dea2d3408f73907a210
--- /dev/null
+++ b/remoting/test/chromoting_test_driver.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include <string>
+
+#include "base/command_line.h"
+#include "base/test/test_suite.h"
+#include "base/test/test_switches.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace switches {
+const char kSingleProcessTestsSwitchName[] = "single-process-tests";
+const char kUserNameSwitchName[] = "username";
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
+  testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
+  base::TestSuite test_suite(argc, argv);
+
+  base::CommandLine* command_line = base::CommandLine::ForCurrentProcess();
+  DCHECK(command_line);
+
+  // Do not retry if tests fails.
+  command_line->AppendSwitchASCII(switches::kTestLauncherRetryLimit, "0");
+
+  // Do not run tests in parallel. Interactions between the host and test
+  // client should not interfere with another test client.

[joedow, 2015/06/08 18:35:20]

Can you make this comment more clear about why you don't want to run tests in
parallel?

[tonychun, 2015/06/08 20:35:58]

This is an old comment. I should have changed it.

+  command_line->AppendSwitch(switches::kSingleProcessTestsSwitchName);
+
+  std::string username(
+    command_line->GetSwitchValueASCII(switches::kUserNameSwitchName));
+  // Verify that the username is passed in as an argument.
+  if (username.empty()) {
+    LOG(ERROR) << "No username passed in, can't authenticate without that!";
+    return -1;
+  }
+  DVLOG(1) << "Running chromoting tests as: " << username;
+
+  return 0;

[Sergey Ulanov, 2015/06/08 18:57:37]

This doesn't actually run any tests. Is this intentional?

[tonychun, 2015/06/08 20:35:58]

Yes. My first step was to just have a driver up and running. I don't want to put
too much onto one CL.

+}
+