Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2294)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/extensions/api/declarative_webrequest/webrequest_rules_registry_unittest.cc

Issue 11569007: Refactoring how conditions without URL attributes are handled. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Refactor of GetMatches, IsFulfilled etc. Created 8 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/declarative_webrequest/webrequest_rules_registry_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/extensions/api/declarative_webrequest/webrequest_rules_registry_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/extensions/api/declarative_webrequest/webrequest_rules_registry_unittest.cc
index 3d6895c559d3856079aab304eb38a3142c7e4d0d..6433f59487ee5ed799c3b21598d5d0c4b9a304f1 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/extensions/api/declarative_webrequest/webrequest_rules_registry_unittest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/extensions/api/declarative_webrequest/webrequest_rules_registry_unittest.cc
@@ -42,6 +42,12 @@ class TestWebRequestRulesRegistry : public WebRequestRulesRegistry {
// to be cleared.
int num_clear_cache_calls() const { return num_clear_cache_calls_; }
+ // How many rules are there which have some conditions not triggered by URL
+ // matches.
+ size_t RulesWithoutTriggers() const {
+ return rules_with_untriggered_conditions_for_test().size();
+ }
+
protected:
virtual ~TestWebRequestRulesRegistry() {}
@@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ TEST_F(WebRequestRulesRegistryTest, AddRulesImpl) {
EXPECT_EQ("", error);
EXPECT_EQ(1, registry->num_clear_cache_calls());
- std::set<WebRequestRule::GlobalRuleId> matches;
+ std::set<const WebRequestRule*> matches;
GURL http_url("http://www.example.com");
net::TestURLRequestContext context;
@@ -232,18 +238,24 @@ TEST_F(WebRequestRulesRegistryTest, AddRulesImpl) {
matches = registry->GetMatches(
WebRequestRule::RequestData(&http_request, ON_BEFORE_REQUEST));
EXPECT_EQ(2u, matches.size());
- EXPECT_TRUE(matches.find(std::make_pair(kExtensionId, kRuleId1)) !=
- matches.end());
- EXPECT_TRUE(matches.find(std::make_pair(kExtensionId, kRuleId2)) !=
- matches.end());
+
+ std::set<WebRequestRule::GlobalRuleId> matches_ids;
+ for (std::set<const WebRequestRule*>::const_iterator it = matches.begin();
+ it != matches.end(); ++it)
+ matches_ids.insert((*it)->id());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(matches_ids.find(std::make_pair(kExtensionId, kRuleId1)) !=
Jeffrey Yasskin 2012/12/18 21:56:02 Use ContainsKey for this?
vabr (Chromium) 2012/12/19 08:38:19 Done.
+ matches_ids.end());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(matches_ids.find(std::make_pair(kExtensionId, kRuleId2)) !=
+ matches_ids.end());
GURL foobar_url("http://www.foobar.com");
net::TestURLRequest foobar_request(foobar_url, NULL, &context);
matches = registry->GetMatches(
WebRequestRule::RequestData(&foobar_request, ON_BEFORE_REQUEST));
EXPECT_EQ(1u, matches.size());
- EXPECT_TRUE(matches.find(std::make_pair(kExtensionId, kRuleId2)) !=
- matches.end());
+ WebRequestRule::GlobalRuleId expected_pair =
+ std::make_pair(kExtensionId, kRuleId2);
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_pair, (*matches.begin())->id());
}
TEST_F(WebRequestRulesRegistryTest, RemoveRulesImpl) {
@@ -263,6 +275,7 @@ TEST_F(WebRequestRulesRegistryTest, RemoveRulesImpl) {
std::vector<linked_ptr<RulesRegistry::Rule> > registered_rules;
registry->GetAllRules(kExtensionId, &registered_rules);
EXPECT_EQ(2u, registered_rules.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, registry->RulesWithoutTriggers());
// Remove first rule.
std::vector<std::string> rules_to_remove;
@@ -275,6 +288,7 @@ TEST_F(WebRequestRulesRegistryTest, RemoveRulesImpl) {
registered_rules.clear();
registry->GetAllRules(kExtensionId, &registered_rules);
EXPECT_EQ(1u, registered_rules.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, registry->RulesWithoutTriggers());
// Now rules_to_remove contains both rules, i.e. one that does not exist in
// the rules registry anymore. Effectively we only remove the second rule.
@@ -287,6 +301,7 @@ TEST_F(WebRequestRulesRegistryTest, RemoveRulesImpl) {
registered_rules.clear();
registry->GetAllRules(kExtensionId, &registered_rules);
EXPECT_EQ(0u, registered_rules.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, registry->RulesWithoutTriggers());
EXPECT_TRUE(registry->IsEmpty());
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698