Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(638)

Unified Diff: base/sequence_checker_impl_unittest.cc

Issue 11550031: Implement SequenceChecker, which is a generalization of ThreadChecker (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Created 8 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: base/sequence_checker_impl_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/sequence_checker_impl_unittest.cc b/base/sequence_checker_impl_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2acb698a4a518b9e8fca7c166357809f866140ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/base/sequence_checker_impl_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/sequence_checker_impl.h"
+
+#include <cstddef>
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/compiler_specific.h"
+#include "base/location.h"
+#include "base/memory/ref_counted.h"
+#include "base/message_loop.h"
+#include "base/sequenced_task_runner.h"
+#include "base/threading/thread.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace base {
+
+namespace {
+
+// Implementation of SequencedTaskRunner that lets us control what
+// RunsTasksOnCurrentThread() returns.
+class FakeTaskRunner : public SequencedTaskRunner {
+ public:
+ FakeTaskRunner() : runs_tasks_on_current_thread_(false) {}
+
+ void SetRunsTasksOnCurrentThread(bool runs_tasks_on_current_thread) {
+ runs_tasks_on_current_thread_ = runs_tasks_on_current_thread;
+ }
+
+ // SequencedTaskRunner implementation.
+ virtual bool PostDelayedTask(const tracked_objects::Location& from_here,
+ const Closure& task,
+ TimeDelta delay) OVERRIDE {
+ ADD_FAILURE();
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ virtual bool PostNonNestableDelayedTask(
+ const tracked_objects::Location& from_here,
+ const Closure& task,
+ TimeDelta delay) OVERRIDE {
+ ADD_FAILURE();
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ virtual bool RunsTasksOnCurrentThread() const OVERRIDE {
+ return runs_tasks_on_current_thread_;
+ }
+
+ protected:
+ virtual ~FakeTaskRunner() {}
+
+ private:
+ bool runs_tasks_on_current_thread_;
+};
+
+class SequenceCheckerImplTest : public ::testing::Test {
+};
+
+// Create a SequenceCheckerImpl with a SequencedTaskRunner and make
+// sure that CalledInSequence() returns what that SequencedTaskRunner
+// returns for RunsTasksOnCurrentThread().
+TEST_F(SequenceCheckerImplTest, CalledInSequenceNonNull) {
+ const scoped_refptr<FakeTaskRunner> fake_sequenced_task_runner(
+ new FakeTaskRunner());
+
+ const SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_impl(fake_sequenced_task_runner);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+
+ fake_sequenced_task_runner->SetRunsTasksOnCurrentThread(true);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+
+ fake_sequenced_task_runner->SetRunsTasksOnCurrentThread(false);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+}
+
+void ExpectCalledInSequence(const tracked_objects::Location& location,
+ const SequenceCheckerImpl* sequence_checker_impl,
+ bool expected_value) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_value, sequence_checker_impl->CalledInSequence())
+ << location.ToString();
+}
+
+// Create a SequenceCheckerImpl with no SequencedTaskRunner and make
+// sure that CalledInSequence() behaves like
+// ThreadChecker::CalledOnValidThread().
+TEST_F(SequenceCheckerImplTest, CalledInSequenceNull) {
+ const SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_impl(NULL);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+
+ {
+ Thread thread("thread 1");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(thread.Start());
+ thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledInSequence,
+ FROM_HERE,
+ Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+ false));
Ryan Sleevi 2012/12/13 22:49:15 I didn't think it was safe for GTest to use ADD_FA
akalin 2012/12/18 22:12:19 ADD_FAILURE() seems to work from other threads. I
+ }
+}
+
+// Create a SequenceCheckerImpl with a SequencedTaskRunner and switch
+// it to another one. CalledInSequence() should return what its
+// underlying SequencedTaskRunner returns for
+// RunsTasksOnCurrentThread().
+TEST_F(SequenceCheckerImplTest, ChangeSequenceNonNull) {
+ const scoped_refptr<FakeTaskRunner> fake_sequenced_task_runner1(
+ new FakeTaskRunner());
+
+ const scoped_refptr<FakeTaskRunner> fake_sequenced_task_runner2(
+ new FakeTaskRunner());
+
+ SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_impl(fake_sequenced_task_runner1);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+
+ fake_sequenced_task_runner2->SetRunsTasksOnCurrentThread(true);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+
+ sequence_checker_impl.ChangeSequence(fake_sequenced_task_runner2);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+}
+
+// Create a SequenceCheckerImpl with a SequencedTaskRunner and switch
+// it to a NULL one. CalledInSequence() should then behave like
+// ThreadChecker::CalledOnValidThread().
+TEST_F(SequenceCheckerImplTest, ChangeSequenceNull) {
+ const scoped_refptr<FakeTaskRunner> fake_sequenced_task_runner(
+ new FakeTaskRunner());
+
+ SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_impl(fake_sequenced_task_runner);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+
+ sequence_checker_impl.ChangeSequence(NULL);
+ // Binds to current thread.
Ryan Sleevi 2012/12/13 22:49:15 Move this comment up a line?
akalin 2012/12/18 22:12:19 Actually, the comment is in the right place -- the
+ EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+ {
+ Thread thread("thread 1");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(thread.Start());
+ thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledInSequence,
+ FROM_HERE,
+ Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+ false));
+ }
+
+ sequence_checker_impl.ChangeSequence(NULL);
+ // Binds to worker thread.
+ {
+ Thread thread("thread 2");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(thread.Start());
+ thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledInSequence,
+ FROM_HERE,
+ Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+ true));
+ }
+ EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+}
+
+// Create a SequenceCheckerImpl with the current thread's task runner
+// and switch it to other ones. CalledInSequence() should return true
+// only when it's on the correct thread.
+TEST_F(SequenceCheckerImplTest, MultipleThreads) {
+ MessageLoop loop;
+
+ SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_impl(loop.message_loop_proxy());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+
+ {
+ Thread thread("thread 1");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(thread.Start());
+ thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledInSequence,
+ FROM_HERE,
+ Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+ false));
+ thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, Bind(&SequenceCheckerImpl::ChangeSequence,
+ Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+ thread.message_loop_proxy()));
+ thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledInSequence,
+ FROM_HERE,
+ Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+ true));
+ }
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+
+ sequence_checker_impl.ChangeSequence(loop.message_loop_proxy());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledInSequence());
+
+ {
+ Thread thread("thread 2");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(thread.Start());
+ thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledInSequence,
+ FROM_HERE,
+ Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+ false));
+ }
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
+} // namespace base

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698