Implement SequenceChecker, which is a generalization of ThreadChecker

base/sequence_checker_impl_unittest.cc

+// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/sequence_checker_impl.h"
+
+#include <cstddef>
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/compiler_specific.h"
+#include "base/location.h"
+#include "base/memory/ref_counted.h"
+#include "base/message_loop.h"
+#include "base/sequenced_task_runner.h"
+#include "base/threading/thread.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace base {
+
+namespace {
+
+// Implementation of SequencedTaskRunner that lets us control what
+// RunsTasksOnCurrentThread() returns.
+class FakeTaskRunner : public SequencedTaskRunner {
+ public:
+  FakeTaskRunner() : runs_tasks_on_current_thread_(false) {}
+
+  void SetRunsTasksOnCurrentThread(bool runs_tasks_on_current_thread) {
+    runs_tasks_on_current_thread_ = runs_tasks_on_current_thread;
+  }
+
+  // SequencedTaskRunner implementation.
+  virtual bool PostDelayedTask(const tracked_objects::Location& from_here,
+                               const Closure& task,
+                               TimeDelta delay) OVERRIDE {
+    ADD_FAILURE();
+    return false;
+  }
+
+  virtual bool PostNonNestableDelayedTask(
+      const tracked_objects::Location& from_here,
+      const Closure& task,
+      TimeDelta delay) OVERRIDE {
+    ADD_FAILURE();
+    return false;
+  }
+
+  virtual bool RunsTasksOnCurrentThread() const OVERRIDE {
+    return runs_tasks_on_current_thread_;
+  }
+
+ protected:
+  virtual ~FakeTaskRunner() {}
+
+ private:
+  bool runs_tasks_on_current_thread_;
+};
+
+class SequenceCheckerImplTest : public ::testing::Test {
+};
+
+// Create a SequenceCheckerImpl with a SequencedTaskRunner and make
+// sure that CalledOnValidSequence() returns what that SequencedTaskRunner
+// returns for RunsTasksOnCurrentThread().
+TEST_F(SequenceCheckerImplTest, CalledOnValidSequenceNonNull) {
+  const scoped_refptr<FakeTaskRunner> fake_sequenced_task_runner(
+      new FakeTaskRunner());
+
+  const SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_impl(fake_sequenced_task_runner);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+
+  fake_sequenced_task_runner->SetRunsTasksOnCurrentThread(true);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+
+  fake_sequenced_task_runner->SetRunsTasksOnCurrentThread(false);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+}
+
+void ExpectCalledOnValidSequence(
+    const tracked_objects::Location& location,
+    const SequenceCheckerImpl* sequence_checker_impl,
+    bool expected_value) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(expected_value, sequence_checker_impl->CalledOnValidSequence())
+      << location.ToString();
+}
+
+// Create a SequenceCheckerImpl with no SequencedTaskRunner and make
+// sure that CalledOnValidSequence() behaves like
+// ThreadChecker::CalledOnValidThread().
+TEST_F(SequenceCheckerImplTest, CalledOnValidSequenceNull) {
+  const SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_impl(NULL);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+
+  {
+    Thread thread("thread 1");
+    ASSERT_TRUE(thread.Start());
+    thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+        FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledOnValidSequence,
+                        FROM_HERE,
+                        Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+                        false));
+  }

[Ryan Sleevi, 2012/12/21 20:26:47]

I would add one more check here, before exiting, to ensure it's still TRUE for
the current thread.

This is to guarantee that CalledOnValidSequence() from thread 1 does not at all
mutate the state of the STR.

[akalin, 2012/12/21 20:41:40]

Done.

+}
+
+// Create a SequenceCheckerImpl with a SequencedTaskRunner and switch
+// it to another one.  CalledOnValidSequence() should return what its

[Ryan Sleevi, 2012/12/21 20:26:47]

comment nit: In what will probably prove to be my most pedantic (and obscure)
nit ever, both the Chicago Manual of Style and the AP style book have been
updated to no longer recommend two spaces after a period. Even the Reuters
editorial guidelines (which are typically the slowest to adopt) have updated.

So... one space between sentences.

And don't judge me for this pedantry :)

[akalin, 2012/12/21 20:41:40]

Done.  Not judged.

+// underlying SequencedTaskRunner returns for
+// RunsTasksOnCurrentThread().
+TEST_F(SequenceCheckerImplTest, ChangeSequenceNonNull) {
+  const scoped_refptr<FakeTaskRunner> fake_sequenced_task_runner1(
+      new FakeTaskRunner());
+
+  const scoped_refptr<FakeTaskRunner> fake_sequenced_task_runner2(
+      new FakeTaskRunner());
+
+  SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_impl(fake_sequenced_task_runner1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+
+  fake_sequenced_task_runner2->SetRunsTasksOnCurrentThread(true);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+
+  sequence_checker_impl.ChangeSequence(fake_sequenced_task_runner2);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());

[Ryan Sleevi, 2012/12/21 20:26:47]

For complete-ness sake in terms of testing, I would add to this test:

sequence_checker_impl.ChangeSequence(fake_sequenced_task_runner1);
EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());


That is mostly as a test guard against ChangeSequence being bugged and
automatically flipping things to true whenever it changes.

[akalin, 2012/12/21 20:41:40]

Done.

+}
+
+// Create a SequenceCheckerImpl with a SequencedTaskRunner and switch
+// it to a NULL one.  CalledOnValidSequence() should then behave like
+// ThreadChecker::CalledOnValidThread().
+TEST_F(SequenceCheckerImplTest, ChangeSequenceNull) {
+  const scoped_refptr<FakeTaskRunner> fake_sequenced_task_runner(
+      new FakeTaskRunner());
+
+  SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_impl(fake_sequenced_task_runner);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+
+  sequence_checker_impl.ChangeSequence(NULL);
+  // Binds to current thread.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+  {
+    Thread thread("thread 1");
+    ASSERT_TRUE(thread.Start());
+    thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+        FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledOnValidSequence,
+                        FROM_HERE,
+                        Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+                        false));
+  }
+

[Ryan Sleevi, 2012/12/21 20:26:47]

I'd add an EXPECT_TRUE() here (for the same reasons as line 102), so that you
can ensure that ChangeSequence(NULL) is the one 'truly' doing the unbinding, and
not some side-effect of, say, thread 1 going out of scope.

Pedantry, yes.

[akalin, 2012/12/21 20:41:40]

Done.

+  sequence_checker_impl.ChangeSequence(NULL);
+  // Binds to worker thread.
+  {
+    Thread thread("thread 2");
+    ASSERT_TRUE(thread.Start());
+    thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+        FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledOnValidSequence,
+                        FROM_HERE,
+                        Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+                        true));
+  }
+  EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+}
+
+// Create a SequenceCheckerImpl with the current thread's task runner
+// and switch it to other ones.  CalledOnValidSequence() should return true

[Ryan Sleevi, 2012/12/21 20:26:47]

comment nit: "ones" here is a bit weird. You mean "task runners", right?

[akalin, 2012/12/21 20:41:40]

Done.

+// only when it's on the correct thread.
+TEST_F(SequenceCheckerImplTest, MultipleThreads) {
+  MessageLoop loop;
+
+  SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_impl(loop.message_loop_proxy());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+
+  {
+    Thread thread("thread 1");
+    ASSERT_TRUE(thread.Start());
+    thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+        FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledOnValidSequence,
+                        FROM_HERE,
+                        Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+                        false));
+    thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+        FROM_HERE, Bind(&SequenceCheckerImpl::ChangeSequence,
+                        Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+                        thread.message_loop_proxy()));
+    thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+        FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledOnValidSequence,
+                        FROM_HERE,
+                        Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+                        true));
+  }
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+
+  sequence_checker_impl.ChangeSequence(loop.message_loop_proxy());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_impl.CalledOnValidSequence());
+
+  {
+    Thread thread("thread 2");
+    ASSERT_TRUE(thread.Start());
+    thread.message_loop()->PostTask(
+        FROM_HERE, Bind(&ExpectCalledOnValidSequence,
+                        FROM_HERE,
+                        Unretained(&sequence_checker_impl),
+                        false));
+  }
+}

[Ryan Sleevi, 2012/12/21 20:26:47]

nit: Add an EXPECT_TRUE here as well (same as line 102)

[akalin, 2012/12/21 20:41:40]

Done.

+
+}  // namespace
+
+}  // namespace base