Changing string id for CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_COOKIES for block and allow case.

chrome/browser/ui/content_settings/content_setting_bubble_model_unittest.cc

Index: chrome/browser/ui/content_settings/content_setting_bubble_model_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/ui/content_settings/content_setting_bubble_model_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/ui/content_settings/content_setting_bubble_model_unittest.cc
index 961332f9d7ecc6da90ee4b189900f3600969b353..dab8d7424a9548a0bcf3ca1c6d7bfab007037f55 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/ui/content_settings/content_setting_bubble_model_unittest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/ui/content_settings/content_setting_bubble_model_unittest.cc
@@ -115,9 +115,8 @@ TEST_F(ContentSettingBubbleModelTest, Cookies) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(bubble_content_2.title.empty());
   EXPECT_NE(title, bubble_content_2.title);
   ASSERT_EQ(2U, bubble_content_2.radio_group.radio_items.size());
-  // TODO(bauerb): Update this once the strings have been updated.
-  EXPECT_EQ(radio1, bubble_content_2.radio_group.radio_items[0]);
-  EXPECT_EQ(radio2, bubble_content_2.radio_group.radio_items[1]);
+  EXPECT_NE(radio1, bubble_content_2.radio_group.radio_items[0]);

[Bernhard Bauer, 2015/06/05 14:23:46]

Can we update this test so it tests something more meaningful than the messages
being different? At the risk of making it too brittle, I would suggest manually
constructing the expected message (via GetString(F)) and comparing that.

[Deepak, 2015/06/08 05:53:31]

Done.

+  EXPECT_NE(radio2, bubble_content_2.radio_group.radio_items[1]);
   EXPECT_FALSE(bubble_content_2.custom_link.empty());
   EXPECT_TRUE(bubble_content_2.custom_link_enabled);
   EXPECT_FALSE(bubble_content_2.manage_link.empty());