Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(961)

Unified Diff: test/mjsunit/regress/regress-492.js

Issue 11438042: Allow lazy compilation (and thus optimisation) of functions inside eval. (Closed) Base URL: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge
Patch Set: Fixed copyright date Created 8 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: test/mjsunit/regress/regress-492.js
diff --git a/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-492.js b/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-492.js
index a8b783b301d88e8ae1929a9b5caa24ea2d357b09..ce1de2d6db7d3c0757ad1f37c2eb67a29f3da570 100644
--- a/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-492.js
+++ b/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-492.js
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
// This should not hit any asserts in debug mode on ARM.
function function_with_n_args(n) {
- var source = '(function f(';
+ var source = '(function f' + n + '(';
for (var arg = 0; arg < n; arg++) {
if (arg != 0) source += ',';
source += 'arg' + arg;
@@ -50,3 +50,42 @@ for (args = 500; args < 520; args++) {
for (args = 1019; args < 1041; args++) {
function_with_n_args(args);
}
+
+
+function foo(
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x
+) {}
+
+for (var i = 0; i < 10; ++i) foo();
Michael Starzinger 2012/12/07 09:50:17 Is there a particular reason we need two loops her
rossberg 2012/12/07 10:23:33 Removed.
+for (var i = 0; i < 10000; ++i) foo();

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698