Ensure ErroneousElement for static getter with no setter.

tests/language/static_getter_no_setter3_test.dart

Index: tests/language/static_getter_no_setter3_test.dart
diff --git a/tests/language/static_getter_no_setter3_test.dart b/tests/language/static_getter_no_setter3_test.dart
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c466e7dc7cd4c40521e50ceea8faf6d3b18cf1bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/language/static_getter_no_setter3_test.dart
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2015, the Dart project authors.  Please see the AUTHORS file
+// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
+// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+import 'package:expect/expect.dart';
+
+bool getter_visited = false;
+
+class Class {
+  static final int getter = (){
+    getter_visited = true;

[herhut, 2015/05/19 14:18:31]

I am not getting this part. Is this testing that we do not remove the getter as
it is might become unused if we optimize wrongly?

[Johnni Winther, 2015/05/20 07:49:42]

Just testing that we read [getter], i.e. don't throw on read but on write.

+  }();
+
+  method() {
+    try {
+      getter++; /// 01: static type warning
+    } on NoSuchMethodError catch(e) {
+      Expect.isTrue(getter_visited); /// 01: continued
+      return;
+    }
+    Expect.fail('Expected NoSuchMethodError'); /// 01: continued
+  }
+}
+
+main() {
+  new Class().method();
+}