Update from https://crrev.com/329939

tools/clang/plugins/tests/missing_ctor.h

Index: tools/clang/plugins/tests/missing_ctor.h
diff --git a/tools/clang/plugins/tests/missing_ctor.h b/tools/clang/plugins/tests/missing_ctor.h
index 0551fd739473d6f0503185efd665d5bbeeecbbea..2587a10d9e75dd80b018d4ef771ca4ca4c82a92e 100644
--- a/tools/clang/plugins/tests/missing_ctor.h
+++ b/tools/clang/plugins/tests/missing_ctor.h
@@ -5,8 +5,20 @@
 #ifndef MISSING_CTOR_H_
 #define MISSING_CTOR_H_
 
-#include <string>
-#include <vector>
+struct MyString {
+  MyString();
+  ~MyString();
+  MyString(const MyString&);
+  MyString(MyString&&);
+};
+
+template <class T>
+struct MyVector {
+  MyVector();
+  ~MyVector();
+  MyVector(const MyVector&);
+  MyVector(MyVector&&);
+};
 
 // Note: this should warn for an implicit copy constructor too, but currently
 // doesn't, due to a plugin bug.
@@ -14,8 +26,8 @@ class MissingCtorsArentOKInHeader {
  public:
 
  private:
-  std::vector<int> one_;
-  std::vector<std::string> two_;
+  MyVector<int> one_;
+  MyVector<MyString> two_;
 };
 
 // Inline move ctors shouldn't be warned about. Similar to the previous test
@@ -26,9 +38,9 @@ class InlineImplicitMoveCtorOK {
 
  private:
   // ctor weight = 12, dtor weight = 9.
-  std::string one_;
-  std::string two_;
-  std::string three_;
+  MyString one_;
+  MyString two_;
+  MyString three_;
   int four_;
   int five_;
   int six_;
@@ -42,8 +54,8 @@ class ExplicitlyDefaultedInlineAlsoWarns {
       const ExplicitlyDefaultedInlineAlsoWarns&) = default;
 
  private:
-  std::vector<int> one_;
-  std::vector<std::string> two_;
+  MyVector<int> one_;
+  MyVector<MyString> two_;
 
 };