Issue 11362182: Keep the number of descriptors below DescriptorArray::kMaxNumberOfDescriptors even for accessors

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Issue 11362182: Keep the number of descriptors below DescriptorArray::kMaxNumberOfDescriptors even for accessors (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 1 month ago by Sven Panne

Modified:
6 years, 11 months ago

Reviewers:
Toon Verwaest

CC:
v8-dev

Base URL:
https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge

Visibility:
Public.

More Reviews

Description

Keep the number of descriptors below DescriptorArray::kMaxNumberOfDescriptors even for accessors Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=12916

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : rebased #

Created: 8 years, 1 month ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

		Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Delta from patch set	Stats (+3 lines, -1 line)			Patch
	M	src/objects.cc	View	1	1 chunk	+3 lines, -1 line	0 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages

indutny

6 years, 11 months ago (2014-01-10 23:21:19 UTC) #3

Message was sent while issue was closed.

Hm... I'm not sure how, but it doesn't seem that this commit was backported to
the 3.14 branch. Is it too late for this to be done? (there're several other
fixes for similar problems that were backported, but not this one).

Thank you, anyway!

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages