Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(428)

Unified Diff: content/browser/media/capture/capture_resolution_evaluator.cc

Issue 1135823004: Implement all resolution change policies for desktop and tab capture. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@resolution_change_policy_constraints_ITEM1_CR1
Patch Set: Addressed Dale's comments. Created 5 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/browser/media/capture/capture_resolution_evaluator.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/media/capture/capture_resolution_evaluator.cc b/content/browser/media/capture/capture_resolution_evaluator.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e082f6c98bc5f73b6b2014db6805530231a8d3a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/browser/media/capture/capture_resolution_evaluator.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+// Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "content/browser/media/capture/capture_resolution_evaluator.h"
+
+#include "media/base/limits.h"
+#include "media/base/video_util.h"
+
+namespace content {
+
+namespace {
+
+// Compute the minimum frame size from the given |max_frame_size| and
+// |resolution_change_policy|.
+gfx::Size ComputeMinimumCaptureSize(
+ const gfx::Size& max_frame_size,
+ media::ResolutionChangePolicy resolution_change_policy) {
+ switch (resolution_change_policy) {
+ case media::RESOLUTION_POLICY_FIXED_RESOLUTION:
+ return max_frame_size;
+ case media::RESOLUTION_POLICY_FIXED_ASPECT_RATIO: {
+ // TODO(miu): This is a place-holder until "min constraints" are plumbed-
+ // in from the MediaStream framework. http://crbug.com/473336
+ const int kMinLines = 180;
+ if (max_frame_size.height() <= kMinLines)
+ return max_frame_size;
+ const gfx::Size result(
+ kMinLines * max_frame_size.width() / max_frame_size.height(),
+ kMinLines);
+ if (result.width() <= 0 || result.width() > media::limits::kMaxDimension)
+ return max_frame_size;
+ return result;
+ }
+ case media::RESOLUTION_POLICY_ANY_WITHIN_LIMIT:
+ break;
Wez 2015/05/13 19:05:08 nit: Suggest returning Size(1,1) explicitly here,
miu 2015/05/14 01:21:32 Done.
+ case media::RESOLUTION_POLICY_LAST:
Wez 2015/05/13 19:05:08 Won't this raise compilation errors since you're h
miu 2015/05/14 01:21:32 This is the "meaningless" enum value that only exi
Wez 2015/05/15 00:55:42 Dang, hoisted by my own petard! I thought the IPC
+ NOTREACHED();
+ }
+ return gfx::Size(1, 1);
Wez 2015/05/13 19:05:08 nit: Can you get rid of this if you add a return t
miu 2015/05/14 01:21:32 MSVC++ compiler complains, unfortunately, even tho
Wez 2015/05/15 00:55:42 I thought that VS2010 and above got this right, pr
miu 2015/05/15 21:14:00 Nope. The compile of patch set 4 (where I tried i
+}
+
+// Returns |size|, unless it exceeds |max_size| or is under |min_size|. When
+// the bounds are exceeded, a uniformly scaled |size| is returned that is within
Wez 2015/05/13 19:05:08 nit: Is "uniformly scaled" sufficiently well-under
miu 2015/05/14 01:21:32 Done. Clarified.
+// the bounds.
+gfx::Size ComputeBoundedCaptureSize(const gfx::Size& size,
+ const gfx::Size& min_size,
+ const gfx::Size& max_size) {
+ if (size.width() > max_size.width() || size.height() > max_size.height()) {
+ gfx::Size result = media::ScaleSizeToFitWithinTarget(size, max_size);
+ result.SetToMax(min_size);
+ return result;
+ } else if (size.width() < min_size.width() ||
+ size.height() < min_size.height()) {
+ gfx::Size result = media::ScaleSizeToEncompassTarget(size, min_size);
+ result.SetToMin(max_size);
+ return result;
+ } else {
+ return size;
+ }
+}
+
+} // nampspace
+
+CaptureResolutionEvaluator::CaptureResolutionEvaluator(
+ const gfx::Size& max_frame_size,
+ media::ResolutionChangePolicy resolution_change_policy)
+ : max_frame_size_(max_frame_size),
+ min_frame_size_(ComputeMinimumCaptureSize(max_frame_size,
+ resolution_change_policy)),
+ resolution_change_policy_(resolution_change_policy),
+ ideal_capture_size_(max_frame_size) {
+ DCHECK_LT(0, max_frame_size_.width());
+ DCHECK_LT(0, max_frame_size_.height());
+ DCHECK_LE(min_frame_size_.width(), max_frame_size_.width());
+ DCHECK_LE(min_frame_size_.height(), max_frame_size_.height());
+
+ UpdateCaptureSize();
+}
+
+CaptureResolutionEvaluator::~CaptureResolutionEvaluator() {}
+
+void CaptureResolutionEvaluator::UpdateForNewSourceSize(
+ const gfx::Size& source_size) {
+ if (source_size.IsEmpty())
+ return;
+
+ switch (resolution_change_policy_) {
+ case media::RESOLUTION_POLICY_FIXED_RESOLUTION:
+ // Source size changes do not affect the frame resolution. Frame
+ // resolution is always fixed to |max_frame_size_|.
+ break;
+
+ case media::RESOLUTION_POLICY_FIXED_ASPECT_RATIO:
+ ideal_capture_size_ = ComputeBoundedCaptureSize(
+ media::PadToMatchAspectRatio(source_size, max_frame_size_),
+ min_frame_size_,
+ max_frame_size_);
+ UpdateCaptureSize();
+ break;
+
+ case media::RESOLUTION_POLICY_ANY_WITHIN_LIMIT:
+ ideal_capture_size_ = ComputeBoundedCaptureSize(
+ source_size, min_frame_size_, max_frame_size_);
+ UpdateCaptureSize();
+ break;
+
+ case media::RESOLUTION_POLICY_LAST:
+ NOTREACHED();
+ }
+}
+
+void CaptureResolutionEvaluator::UpdateForNewCapabilityLimit(int num_pixels) {
Wez 2015/05/13 19:05:08 Is the rationale for including this in this CL rat
miu 2015/05/14 01:21:32 No. I decided to add it in as a skeleton method s
Wez 2015/05/15 00:55:42 OK; in that case I'd remove it and just add it in
miu 2015/05/15 21:14:00 Done.
+ NOTIMPLEMENTED();
+}
+
+void CaptureResolutionEvaluator::UpdateCaptureSize() {
+ // TODO(miu): An upcoming change will introduce the ability to find the best
+ // capture resolution, given the current capabilities of the system.
Wez 2015/05/13 19:05:08 Bug # for that change? :)
miu 2015/05/14 01:21:31 Done.
+ capture_size_ = ideal_capture_size_;
+}
+
+} // namespace content

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698