Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(324)

Issue 11316238: gpu: don't try to discard/recreate backbuffer while draws are deferred. (Closed)

Created:
8 years ago by piman
Modified:
8 years ago
Reviewers:
jonathan.backer
CC:
chromium-reviews, joi+watch-content_chromium.org, darin-cc_chromium.org, jam, apatrick_chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

gpu: don't try to discard/recreate backbuffer while draws are deferred. BUG=None Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=170366

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Only requeue currently processing message #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 3 : reset currently_processing_message_ in RequeueMessage #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+34 lines, -3 lines) Patch
M content/common/gpu/gpu_channel.h View 1 2 chunks +6 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M content/common/gpu/gpu_channel.cc View 1 2 3 chunks +15 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M content/common/gpu/gpu_command_buffer_stub.cc View 1 1 chunk +12 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M content/common/gpu/texture_image_transport_surface.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 10 (0 generated)
piman
8 years ago (2012-11-29 04:21:31 UTC) #1
no sievers
lgtm So it's only discardFramebuffer() that invokes backbuffer deallocation? The memory manager will never be ...
8 years ago (2012-11-29 04:53:32 UTC) #2
jonathan.backer
LGTM If you wanted to enforce the contract that you can only requeue those messages ...
8 years ago (2012-11-29 15:27:34 UTC) #3
piman
On 2012/11/29 15:27:34, jonathan.backer wrote: > LGTM > > If you wanted to enforce the ...
8 years ago (2012-11-29 19:47:02 UTC) #4
jonathan.backer
LGTM. One small nit. Your call. https://codereview.chromium.org/11316238/diff/6001/content/common/gpu/gpu_channel.cc File content/common/gpu/gpu_channel.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/11316238/diff/6001/content/common/gpu/gpu_channel.cc#newcode368 content/common/gpu/gpu_channel.cc:368: unprocessed_messages_->IncCount(); I'm paranoid. ...
8 years ago (2012-11-29 19:55:11 UTC) #5
piman
https://codereview.chromium.org/11316238/diff/6001/content/common/gpu/gpu_channel.cc File content/common/gpu/gpu_channel.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/11316238/diff/6001/content/common/gpu/gpu_channel.cc#newcode368 content/common/gpu/gpu_channel.cc:368: unprocessed_messages_->IncCount(); On 2012/11/29 19:55:11, jonathan.backer wrote: > I'm paranoid. ...
8 years ago (2012-11-29 20:20:57 UTC) #6
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/piman@chromium.org/11316238/5013
8 years ago (2012-11-29 20:21:28 UTC) #7
commit-bot: I haz the power
Retried try job too often on win_rel for step(s) browser_tests
8 years ago (2012-11-29 23:20:28 UTC) #8
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/piman@chromium.org/11316238/5013
8 years ago (2012-11-30 00:16:47 UTC) #9
commit-bot: I haz the power
8 years ago (2012-11-30 02:36:08 UTC) #10
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Change committed as 170366

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698