Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(62)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc

Issue 11308362: Add StoragePartition's ProtocolHandlers at URLRequestContext construction time. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: sync (r175140) Created 7 years, 12 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc b/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc
index f6c9367070353eef0747e2c260329de83dc36641..fe82133ac2aa834f0621fc65e49153116dfc3b2d 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc
@@ -503,8 +503,6 @@ void ProfileImpl::DoFinalInit(bool is_new_profile) {
cache_max_size, media_cache_path, media_cache_max_size,
extensions_cookie_path, GetPath(), infinite_cache_path,
predictor_,
- g_browser_process->local_state(),
- g_browser_process->io_thread(),
restore_old_session_cookies,
GetSpecialStoragePolicy());
@@ -789,6 +787,21 @@ FilePath ProfileImpl::GetPrefFilePath() {
return pref_file_path;
}
+net::URLRequestContextGetter* ProfileImpl::CreateRequestContext(
+ scoped_ptr<net::URLRequestJobFactory::ProtocolHandler>
+ blob_protocol_handler,
+ scoped_ptr<net::URLRequestJobFactory::ProtocolHandler>
+ file_system_protocol_handler,
+ scoped_ptr<net::URLRequestJobFactory::Interceptor>
+ developer_protocol_handler) {
+ return io_data_.CreateMainRequestContextGetter(
+ blob_protocol_handler.Pass(),
+ file_system_protocol_handler.Pass(),
+ developer_protocol_handler.Pass(),
+ g_browser_process->local_state(),
+ g_browser_process->io_thread());
+}
+
net::URLRequestContextGetter* ProfileImpl::GetRequestContext() {
return io_data_.GetMainRequestContextGetter();
mmenke 2013/01/08 17:19:26 Now that we're separating out creation from initia
awong 2013/01/16 21:31:50 At a surface level, this sounds fine to me. I thin
mmenke 2013/01/16 23:40:36 My understanding from what you said earlier is tha
mmenke 2013/01/16 23:45:28 Oh, and while I agree it's a little circular, I th
pauljensen 2013/01/21 06:24:56 I adjusted GetRequestContext() as described. I co
}
@@ -832,10 +845,19 @@ net::URLRequestContextGetter* ProfileImpl::GetRequestContextForExtensions() {
return io_data_.GetExtensionsRequestContextGetter();
}
-net::URLRequestContextGetter* ProfileImpl::GetRequestContextForStoragePartition(
+net::URLRequestContextGetter*
+ProfileImpl::CreateRequestContextForStoragePartition(
const FilePath& partition_path,
- bool in_memory) {
- return io_data_.GetIsolatedAppRequestContextGetter(partition_path, in_memory);
+ bool in_memory,
+ scoped_ptr<net::URLRequestJobFactory::ProtocolHandler>
+ blob_protocol_handler,
+ scoped_ptr<net::URLRequestJobFactory::ProtocolHandler>
+ file_system_protocol_handler,
+ scoped_ptr<net::URLRequestJobFactory::Interceptor>
+ developer_protocol_handler) {
+ return io_data_.CreateIsolatedAppRequestContextGetter(
+ partition_path, in_memory, blob_protocol_handler.Pass(),
+ file_system_protocol_handler.Pass(), developer_protocol_handler.Pass());
}
net::SSLConfigService* ProfileImpl::GetSSLConfigService() {

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698