Issue 1129693003: Do we still need this DOUBLE_LOOP feature?

Issue 1129693003: Do we still need this DOUBLE_LOOP feature? (Closed)

Created:
5 years, 7 months ago by mtklein_C

Modified:
5 years, 7 months ago

Reviewers:
joshualitt, mtklein

CC:
reviews_skia.org

Base URL:
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia.git@master

Target Ref:
refs/heads/master

Project:
skia

Visibility:
Public.

Do we still need this DOUBLE_LOOP feature? If so, let's do it this way so it works for all source types and doesn't need to be chosen at compile time. BUG=skia: Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6fbf4b3a7f0a3304649c482ab0a911dc147a6825

Created: 5 years, 7 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

	Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Stats (+24 lines, -12 lines)			Patch
M	dm/DM.cpp	View	1 chunk	+1 line, -0 lines	0 comments	Download
M	dm/DMSrcSink.h	View	1 chunk	+6 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download
M	dm/DMSrcSink.cpp	View	2 chunks	+17 lines, -12 lines	0 comments	Download

Total messages: 10 (4 generated)

commit-bot: I haz the power

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1129693003/1

5 years, 7 months ago (2015-05-06 17:48:00 UTC) #4

commit-bot: I haz the power

Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.

5 years, 7 months ago (2015-05-06 17:53:35 UTC) #6

joshualitt

On 2015/05/06 17:53:35, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote: > Dry run: This issue passed ...

5 years, 7 months ago (2015-05-06 18:33:04 UTC) #7

commit-bot: I haz the power

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1129693003/1

5 years, 7 months ago (2015-05-06 18:35:29 UTC) #9

commit-bot: I haz the power

5 years, 7 months ago (2015-05-06 18:35:45 UTC) #10

Message was sent while issue was closed.

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6fbf4b3a7f0a3304649c482ab0a911dc147a6825