Chromium Code Reviews| Index: cc/trees/layer_tree_host_unittest.cc |
| diff --git a/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_unittest.cc b/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_unittest.cc |
| index 51ea3d91a69aba3cdad2746c61acb6849d9c2e2f..42c6907acd0b9594533d7896cf7e34447ef7fc84 100644 |
| --- a/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_unittest.cc |
| +++ b/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_unittest.cc |
| @@ -4927,11 +4927,13 @@ SINGLE_AND_MULTI_THREAD_TEST_F( |
| struct TestSwapPromiseResult { |
| TestSwapPromiseResult() |
| - : did_swap_called(false), |
| + : did_activate_called(false), |
| + did_swap_called(false), |
| did_not_swap_called(false), |
| dtor_called(false), |
| - reason(SwapPromise::DID_NOT_SWAP_UNKNOWN) {} |
| + reason(SwapPromise::COMMIT_FAILS) {} |
| + bool did_activate_called; |
| bool did_swap_called; |
| bool did_not_swap_called; |
| bool dtor_called; |
| @@ -4948,8 +4950,17 @@ class TestSwapPromise : public SwapPromise { |
| result_->dtor_called = true; |
| } |
| + void DidActivate() override { |
| + base::AutoLock lock(result_->lock); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(result_->did_activate_called); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(result_->did_swap_called); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(result_->did_not_swap_called); |
| + result_->did_activate_called = true; |
| + } |
| + |
| void DidSwap(CompositorFrameMetadata* metadata) override { |
| base::AutoLock lock(result_->lock); |
| + EXPECT_TRUE(result_->did_activate_called); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result_->did_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result_->did_not_swap_called); |
| result_->did_swap_called = true; |
| @@ -4959,6 +4970,9 @@ class TestSwapPromise : public SwapPromise { |
| base::AutoLock lock(result_->lock); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result_->did_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result_->did_not_swap_called); |
| + auto implies = [](bool a, bool b) -> bool { return !a || b; }; |
| + EXPECT_TRUE(implies(reason == DidNotSwapReason::ACTIVATION_FAILS, |
|
boliu
2015/05/14 14:40:21
That's overkill. Can you just write it as EXPECT_T
Tobias Sargeant
2015/05/14 21:40:48
Yes, but then we're almost back to where we starte
|
| + !result_->did_activate_called)); |
| result_->did_not_swap_called = true; |
| result_->reason = reason; |
| } |
| @@ -4992,6 +5006,22 @@ class LayerTreeHostTestBreakSwapPromise : public LayerTreeHostTest { |
| } |
| } |
| + void WillActivateTreeOnThread(LayerTreeHostImpl* host_impl) override { |
| + if (host_impl->pending_tree()) { |
|
boliu
2015/05/14 14:40:21
Is this check the same as "host_impl->settings().i
Tobias Sargeant
2015/05/14 21:40:48
No, it's not the same.
If you assert that pending
boliu
2015/05/15 03:50:49
You should DCHECK pending_tree() only if impl_side
|
| + int frame = host_impl->pending_tree()->source_frame_number(); |
| + base::AutoLock lock(swap_promise_result_[frame].lock); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_[frame].did_activate_called); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_[frame].did_swap_called); |
| + } |
| + } |
| + |
| + void DidActivateTreeOnThread(LayerTreeHostImpl* host_impl) override { |
| + int frame = host_impl->active_tree()->source_frame_number(); |
| + base::AutoLock lock(swap_promise_result_[frame].lock); |
| + EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_[frame].did_activate_called); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_[frame].did_swap_called); |
| + } |
| + |
| void CommitCompleteOnThread(LayerTreeHostImpl* host_impl) override { |
| commit_complete_count_++; |
| if (commit_complete_count_ == 1) { |
| @@ -5019,6 +5049,7 @@ class LayerTreeHostTestBreakSwapPromise : public LayerTreeHostTest { |
| { |
| // The second commit is aborted since it contains no updates. |
| base::AutoLock lock(swap_promise_result_[1].lock); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_[1].did_activate_called); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_[1].did_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_[1].did_not_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_EQ(SwapPromise::COMMIT_NO_UPDATE, swap_promise_result_[1].reason); |
| @@ -5029,6 +5060,7 @@ class LayerTreeHostTestBreakSwapPromise : public LayerTreeHostTest { |
| // The last commit completes but it does not cause swap buffer because |
| // there is no damage in the frame data. |
| base::AutoLock lock(swap_promise_result_[2].lock); |
| + EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_[2].did_activate_called); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_[2].did_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_[2].did_not_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_EQ(SwapPromise::SWAP_FAILS, swap_promise_result_[2].reason); |
| @@ -5078,6 +5110,23 @@ class LayerTreeHostTestKeepSwapPromise : public LayerTreeTest { |
| } |
| } |
| + void WillActivateTreeOnThread(LayerTreeHostImpl* host_impl) override { |
| + if (host_impl->pending_tree() && |
| + host_impl->pending_tree()->source_frame_number() == 1) { |
| + base::AutoLock lock(swap_promise_result_.lock); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_.did_activate_called); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_.did_swap_called); |
| + } |
| + } |
| + |
| + void DidActivateTreeOnThread(LayerTreeHostImpl* host_impl) override { |
| + if (host_impl->active_tree()->source_frame_number() == 1) { |
| + base::AutoLock lock(swap_promise_result_.lock); |
| + EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_.did_activate_called); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_.did_swap_called); |
| + } |
| + } |
| + |
| void SwapBuffersOnThread(LayerTreeHostImpl* host_impl, bool result) override { |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result); |
| if (host_impl->active_tree()->source_frame_number() >= 1) { |
| @@ -5127,6 +5176,7 @@ class LayerTreeHostTestBreakSwapPromiseForVisibility |
| void AfterTest() override { |
| { |
| base::AutoLock lock(swap_promise_result_.lock); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_.did_activate_called); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_.did_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_.did_not_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_EQ(SwapPromise::COMMIT_FAILS, swap_promise_result_.reason); |
| @@ -5176,6 +5226,7 @@ class LayerTreeHostTestBreakSwapPromiseForContext : public LayerTreeHostTest { |
| void AfterTest() override { |
| { |
| base::AutoLock lock(swap_promise_result_.lock); |
| + EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_.did_activate_called); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_.did_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_.did_not_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_EQ(SwapPromise::COMMIT_FAILS, swap_promise_result_.reason); |
| @@ -5829,6 +5880,7 @@ class LayerTreeHostTestSynchronousCompositeSwapPromise |
| // Second swap promise fails to swap. |
| { |
| base::AutoLock lock(swap_promise_result_[1].lock); |
| + EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_[1].did_activate_called); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_[1].did_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_[1].did_not_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_EQ(SwapPromise::SWAP_FAILS, swap_promise_result_[1].reason); |
| @@ -5838,6 +5890,7 @@ class LayerTreeHostTestSynchronousCompositeSwapPromise |
| // Third swap promises also fails to swap (and draw). |
| { |
| base::AutoLock lock(swap_promise_result_[2].lock); |
| + EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_[2].did_activate_called); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(swap_promise_result_[2].did_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(swap_promise_result_[2].did_not_swap_called); |
| EXPECT_EQ(SwapPromise::SWAP_FAILS, swap_promise_result_[2].reason); |