Revert some other possible suspects of a 0.43% size increase of setup.exe: https://build.chromium.o…

Revert some other possible suspects of a 0.43% size increase of setup.exe: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/Win/builds/31562

  Revert "Add granular base::File tracing."

  This reverts commit a6e05c977096a03774e5406d63ad80c0166f9adc.

  Revert "Add AllReadDataConsumed and AllWriteDataConsumed methods to SocketDataProvider"

  This reverts commit bce10d97d6fc5233071427cf622aaad7abde9e19.

  Revert "Avoid unnecessary memory allocations at PlatformThread::SetName()"

  This reverts commit 4839a142bf95776323647c82ca9dc0725f7c4f15.

TBR=tdresser@chromium.org
BUG=none
TEST=green sizes

Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/c41830d6f55f85e2f5c8841db4b6ed81239b671d

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-05-04 22:03:20]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/c41830d6f55f85e2f5c8841db4b6ed81239b671d
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#328199}

[Dan Beam, 2015-05-04 22:03:41]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
c41830d6f55f85e2f5c8841db4b6ed81239b671d (presubmit successful).

[Ryan Hamilton, 2015-05-04 22:11:29]

On 2015/05/04 22:03:41, Dan Beam wrote:
> Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
> c41830d6f55f85e2f5c8841db4b6ed81239b671d (presubmit successful).

>  Revert "Add AllReadDataConsumed and AllWriteDataConsumed methods to
SocketDataProvider"
>
>  This reverts commit bce10d97d6fc5233071427cf622aaad7abde9e19.

This was a test-only CL, so I don't think that's the problem. In addition, I
think https://codereview.chromium.org/1114213005/ depends on the CL you reverted
so I'm concerned that the revert is going to fail to compile?

[Dan Beam, 2015-05-04 22:19:13]

On 2015/05/04 22:11:29, Ryan Hamilton wrote:
> On 2015/05/04 22:03:41, Dan Beam wrote:
> > Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
> > c41830d6f55f85e2f5c8841db4b6ed81239b671d (presubmit successful).
> 
> >  Revert "Add AllReadDataConsumed and AllWriteDataConsumed methods to
> SocketDataProvider"
> >
> >  This reverts commit bce10d97d6fc5233071427cf622aaad7abde9e19.
> 
> This was a test-only CL, so I don't think that's the problem. In addition, I
> think https://codereview.chromium.org/1114213005/ depends on the CL you
reverted
> so I'm concerned that the revert is going to fail to compile?

.... and you're right (as the compile failures start rolling in).  will
re-instate your CL.

[Dan Beam, 2015-05-04 22:55:20]

A revert of this CL (patchset #1 id:1) has been created in
https://codereview.chromium.org/1123833003/ by dbeam@chromium.org.

The reason for reverting is: Broke the compile because one of these CLs is
already depended on (rch@'s bce10d97d6fc5233071427cf622aaad7abde9e19)..