Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(700)

Unified Diff: Source/core/editing/GranularityStrategy.cpp

Issue 1123563003: Improving direction-based selection strategy. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git@master
Patch Set: Adding StrategyState enum to replace m_cleared, m_lastMoveShrunkSelection. Created 5 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: Source/core/editing/GranularityStrategy.cpp
diff --git a/Source/core/editing/GranularityStrategy.cpp b/Source/core/editing/GranularityStrategy.cpp
index 5a5fd9ee30330abf12efdd949c68fff152dc0636..b1751561e7f029f9b9e5d0c9f6921651f1117385 100644
--- a/Source/core/editing/GranularityStrategy.cpp
+++ b/Source/core/editing/GranularityStrategy.cpp
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include "config.h"
#include "core/editing/GranularityStrategy.h"
+#include "core/editing/FrameSelection.h"
#include "core/editing/htmlediting.h"
namespace blink {
@@ -24,14 +25,19 @@ SelectionStrategy CharacterGranularityStrategy::GetType() const
void CharacterGranularityStrategy::Clear() { };
-VisibleSelection CharacterGranularityStrategy::updateExtent(const VisiblePosition& extentPosition, const VisibleSelection& selection)
+VisibleSelection CharacterGranularityStrategy::updateExtent(const IntPoint& extentPoint, LocalFrame* frame)
{
+ const VisiblePosition& extentPosition = visiblePositionForContentsPoint(extentPoint, frame);
+ const VisibleSelection& selection = frame->selection().selection();
+ if (selection.visibleBase() == extentPosition)
+ return selection;
return VisibleSelection(selection.visibleBase(), extentPosition);
}
DirectionGranularityStrategy::DirectionGranularityStrategy()
- : m_granularity(CharacterGranularity)
- , m_lastMoveShrunkSelection(false) { }
+ : m_state(StrategyState::Cleared)
+ , m_granularity(CharacterGranularity)
+ , m_offset(0) { }
DirectionGranularityStrategy::~DirectionGranularityStrategy() { }
@@ -42,10 +48,24 @@ SelectionStrategy DirectionGranularityStrategy::GetType() const
void DirectionGranularityStrategy::Clear()
{
+ m_state = StrategyState::Cleared;
m_granularity = CharacterGranularity;
- m_lastMoveShrunkSelection = false;
+ m_offset = 0;
+ m_extentPoint.zero();
}
+bool DirectionGranularityStrategy::arePositionsInOrder(
+ const VisiblePosition& pos1,
+ const VisiblePosition& pos2,
+ int order)
+{
+ int positionOrder = comparePositions(pos1, pos2);
+ if (order == 0)
+ return positionOrder == 0;
+ return order > 0 ? positionOrder > 0 : positionOrder < 0;
+}
+
+
VisiblePosition DirectionGranularityStrategy::nextWordBound(
const VisiblePosition& pos,
SearchDirection direction,
@@ -60,68 +80,113 @@ VisiblePosition DirectionGranularityStrategy::nextWordBound(
return startOfWord(pos, wordSide);
}
-VisibleSelection DirectionGranularityStrategy::updateExtent(const VisiblePosition& extentPosition, const VisibleSelection& selection)
+VisibleSelection DirectionGranularityStrategy::updateExtent(const IntPoint& extentPoint, LocalFrame* frame)
{
- if (extentPosition == selection.visibleExtent())
- return selection;
+ const VisibleSelection& selection = frame->selection().selection();
+ // Initialize m_extentPoint if this is the first update after a clear.
+ if (m_state == StrategyState::Cleared) {
+ VisiblePosition pos = selection.isBaseFirst() ? selection.visibleEnd() : selection.visibleStart();
+ m_extentPoint = IntPoint(pos.absoluteCaretBounds().x(), pos.absoluteCaretBounds().y());
+ m_state = StrategyState::Expanding;
+ }
+
+ IntPoint oldOffsetExtentPoint(m_extentPoint.x() + m_offset, m_extentPoint.y());
+ VisiblePosition oldOffsetExtentPosition = visiblePositionForContentsPoint(oldOffsetExtentPoint, frame);
leviw_travelin_and_unemployed 2015/05/20 20:24:37 As discussed in our meeting, hit testing is expens
mfomitchev 2015/05/20 21:37:29 Let me think about/work on this.
+
+ // Apply the offset.
+ IntPoint offsetExtentPoint = extentPoint;
+ int dx = extentPoint.x() - m_extentPoint.x();
leviw_travelin_and_unemployed 2015/05/20 20:24:37 This is just wrong in the presence of transforms o
mfomitchev 2015/05/20 21:37:29 Yup.
+ if (m_offset != 0) {
+ if (m_offset > 0 && dx > 0)
+ m_offset = std::max(0, m_offset - dx);
+ else if (m_offset < 0 && dx < 0)
+ m_offset = std::min(0, m_offset - dx);
+ offsetExtentPoint.move(m_offset, 0);
+ }
+ m_extentPoint = extentPoint;
+
+ VisiblePosition offsetExtentPosition = visiblePositionForContentsPoint(offsetExtentPoint, frame);
+
+ if (!inSameLine(offsetExtentPosition, oldOffsetExtentPosition)) {
+ m_offset = 0;
+ offsetExtentPoint = extentPoint;
+ offsetExtentPosition = visiblePositionForContentsPoint(extentPoint, frame);
+ }
const VisiblePosition base = selection.visibleBase();
- const VisiblePosition oldExtentWithGranularity = selection.isBaseFirst() ? selection.visibleEnd() : selection.visibleStart();
+ int extentBaseOrder = comparePositions(offsetExtentPosition, base);
- int extentBaseOrder = comparePositions(extentPosition, base);
- int oldExtentBaseOrder = comparePositions(oldExtentWithGranularity, base);
+ // Do not allow selection and extent to be at the same position
+ if (extentBaseOrder == 0)
+ return selection;
- bool extentBaseOrderSwitched = (extentBaseOrder > 0 && oldExtentBaseOrder < 0)
- || (extentBaseOrder < 0 && oldExtentBaseOrder > 0);
+ int oldExtentBaseOrder = comparePositions(selection.visibleExtent(), base);
+ bool extentBaseOrderSwitched = !arePositionsInOrder(offsetExtentPosition, base, oldExtentBaseOrder);
leviw_travelin_and_unemployed 2015/05/20 20:24:37 Is it possible to avoid three calls to comparePosi
mfomitchev 2015/05/20 21:37:29 Let me think about this as well.
// Determine the boundary of the 'current word', i.e. the boundary extending
// beyond which should change the granularity to WordGranularity.
- // If the last move has shrunk the selection and is now exactly on the word
- // boundary - we need to take the next bound as the bound of the "current
- // word".
- VisiblePosition currentWordBoundary = nextWordBound(
- oldExtentWithGranularity,
- oldExtentBaseOrder > 0 ? SearchDirection::SearchForward : SearchDirection::SearchBackwards,
- m_lastMoveShrunkSelection ? BoundAdjust::NextBoundIfOnBound : BoundAdjust::CurrentPosIfOnBound);
-
- bool thisMoveShrunkSelection = (extentBaseOrder > 0 && comparePositions(extentPosition, selection.visibleExtent()) < 0)
- || (extentBaseOrder < 0 && comparePositions(extentPosition, selection.visibleExtent()) > 0);
- // If the extent-base order was switched, then the selection is now
- // expanding in a different direction than before. Therefore we need to
- // calculate the boundary of the 'current word' in this new direction in
- // order to be able to tell if the selection expanded beyond it.
+ VisiblePosition currentWordBoundary;
if (extentBaseOrderSwitched) {
+ // Special case.
+ // If the extent-base order was switched, then the selection is now
+ // expanding in a different direction than before. Therefore we
+ // calculate the current word boundary in this new direction and
+ // based on the |base| position.
currentWordBoundary = nextWordBound(
base,
extentBaseOrder > 0 ? SearchDirection::SearchForward : SearchDirection::SearchBackwards,
BoundAdjust::NextBoundIfOnBound);
m_granularity = CharacterGranularity;
- // When the base/extent order switches it doesn't count as shrinking selection.
- thisMoveShrunkSelection = false;
+ } else {
+ // Calculate the current word boundary based on |oldExtentWithGranularity|.
+ // If selection was shrunk in the last update and the extent is now
+ // exactly on the word boundary - we need to take the next bound as the
+ // bound of the current word.
+ currentWordBoundary = nextWordBound(
+ oldOffsetExtentPosition,
+ selection.isBaseFirst() ? SearchDirection::SearchForward : SearchDirection::SearchBackwards,
+ m_state == StrategyState::Shrinking ? BoundAdjust::NextBoundIfOnBound : BoundAdjust::CurrentPosIfOnBound);
}
- bool expandedBeyondWordBoundary;
- if (extentBaseOrder > 0)
- expandedBeyondWordBoundary = comparePositions(extentPosition, currentWordBoundary) > 0;
- else
- expandedBeyondWordBoundary = comparePositions(extentPosition, currentWordBoundary) < 0;
- if (expandedBeyondWordBoundary) {
+ bool expandedBeyondWordBoundary = arePositionsInOrder(offsetExtentPosition, currentWordBoundary, extentBaseOrder);
leviw_travelin_and_unemployed 2015/05/20 20:24:37 More comparePositions...
+
+ // The selection is shrunk if the extent changes position to be closer to
+ // the base, and the extent/base order wasn't switched.
+ bool thisMoveShrunkSelection =
+ !extentBaseOrderSwitched
+ && oldOffsetExtentPosition != offsetExtentPosition
+ && arePositionsInOrder(oldOffsetExtentPosition, offsetExtentPosition, extentBaseOrder);
leviw_travelin_and_unemployed 2015/05/20 20:24:37 And *another* comparePositions. This needs to be c
+
+ if (expandedBeyondWordBoundary)
m_granularity = WordGranularity;
- } else if (thisMoveShrunkSelection) {
+ else if (thisMoveShrunkSelection)
m_granularity = CharacterGranularity;
- m_lastMoveShrunkSelection = true;
- }
- m_lastMoveShrunkSelection = thisMoveShrunkSelection;
- VisibleSelection newSelection = selection;
- newSelection.setExtent(extentPosition);
+ VisiblePosition newSelectionExtent = offsetExtentPosition;
if (m_granularity == WordGranularity) {
- if (extentBaseOrder > 0)
- newSelection.setEndRespectingGranularity(m_granularity, LeftWordIfOnBoundary);
- else
- newSelection.setStartRespectingGranularity(m_granularity, RightWordIfOnBoundary);
+ // Determine the bounds of the word where the extent is located.
+ // Set the selection extent to one of the two bounds depending on
+ // whether the extent is passed the middle of the word.
+ VisiblePosition boundBeforeExtent = nextWordBound(offsetExtentPosition, SearchDirection::SearchBackwards, BoundAdjust::CurrentPosIfOnBound);
+ VisiblePosition boundAfterExtent = nextWordBound(offsetExtentPosition, SearchDirection::SearchForward, BoundAdjust::CurrentPosIfOnBound);
+ int xMiddleBetweenBounds = (boundAfterExtent.absoluteCaretBounds().x() + boundBeforeExtent.absoluteCaretBounds().x()) / 2;
+ bool extentBeforeMiddle = offsetExtentPoint.x() < xMiddleBetweenBounds;
+
+ newSelectionExtent = extentBeforeMiddle ? boundBeforeExtent : boundAfterExtent;
+ // Update the offset if needed.
+ if (!inSameLine(newSelectionExtent, selection.visibleExtent()))
+ m_offset = 0;
+ else if ((extentBaseOrder > 0 && !extentBeforeMiddle) || (extentBaseOrder < 0 && extentBeforeMiddle))
+ m_offset = newSelectionExtent.absoluteCaretBounds().x() - extentPoint.x();
}
+ // Only update the state if the selection actually changed as a result of
+ // this move.
+ if (newSelectionExtent != selection.visibleExtent())
+ m_state = thisMoveShrunkSelection ? StrategyState::Shrinking : StrategyState::Expanding;
+
+ VisibleSelection newSelection = selection;
+ newSelection.setExtent(newSelectionExtent);
return newSelection;
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698