| Index: runtime/third_party/zlib/FAQ
|
| diff --git a/runtime/third_party/zlib/FAQ b/runtime/third_party/zlib/FAQ
|
| new file mode 100644
|
| index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99b7cf92e45497fc8f608777f962dce2148d108b
|
| --- /dev/null
|
| +++ b/runtime/third_party/zlib/FAQ
|
| @@ -0,0 +1,368 @@
|
| +
|
| + Frequently Asked Questions about zlib
|
| +
|
| +
|
| +If your question is not there, please check the zlib home page
|
| +http://zlib.net/ which may have more recent information.
|
| +The lastest zlib FAQ is at http://zlib.net/zlib_faq.html
|
| +
|
| +
|
| + 1. Is zlib Y2K-compliant?
|
| +
|
| + Yes. zlib doesn't handle dates.
|
| +
|
| + 2. Where can I get a Windows DLL version?
|
| +
|
| + The zlib sources can be compiled without change to produce a DLL. See the
|
| + file win32/DLL_FAQ.txt in the zlib distribution. Pointers to the
|
| + precompiled DLL are found in the zlib web site at http://zlib.net/ .
|
| +
|
| + 3. Where can I get a Visual Basic interface to zlib?
|
| +
|
| + See
|
| + * http://marknelson.us/1997/01/01/zlib-engine/
|
| + * win32/DLL_FAQ.txt in the zlib distribution
|
| +
|
| + 4. compress() returns Z_BUF_ERROR.
|
| +
|
| + Make sure that before the call of compress(), the length of the compressed
|
| + buffer is equal to the available size of the compressed buffer and not
|
| + zero. For Visual Basic, check that this parameter is passed by reference
|
| + ("as any"), not by value ("as long").
|
| +
|
| + 5. deflate() or inflate() returns Z_BUF_ERROR.
|
| +
|
| + Before making the call, make sure that avail_in and avail_out are not zero.
|
| + When setting the parameter flush equal to Z_FINISH, also make sure that
|
| + avail_out is big enough to allow processing all pending input. Note that a
|
| + Z_BUF_ERROR is not fatal--another call to deflate() or inflate() can be
|
| + made with more input or output space. A Z_BUF_ERROR may in fact be
|
| + unavoidable depending on how the functions are used, since it is not
|
| + possible to tell whether or not there is more output pending when
|
| + strm.avail_out returns with zero. See http://zlib.net/zlib_how.html for a
|
| + heavily annotated example.
|
| +
|
| + 6. Where's the zlib documentation (man pages, etc.)?
|
| +
|
| + It's in zlib.h . Examples of zlib usage are in the files test/example.c
|
| + and test/minigzip.c, with more in examples/ .
|
| +
|
| + 7. Why don't you use GNU autoconf or libtool or ...?
|
| +
|
| + Because we would like to keep zlib as a very small and simple package.
|
| + zlib is rather portable and doesn't need much configuration.
|
| +
|
| + 8. I found a bug in zlib.
|
| +
|
| + Most of the time, such problems are due to an incorrect usage of zlib.
|
| + Please try to reproduce the problem with a small program and send the
|
| + corresponding source to us at zlib@gzip.org . Do not send multi-megabyte
|
| + data files without prior agreement.
|
| +
|
| + 9. Why do I get "undefined reference to gzputc"?
|
| +
|
| + If "make test" produces something like
|
| +
|
| + example.o(.text+0x154): undefined reference to `gzputc'
|
| +
|
| + check that you don't have old files libz.* in /usr/lib, /usr/local/lib or
|
| + /usr/X11R6/lib. Remove any old versions, then do "make install".
|
| +
|
| +10. I need a Delphi interface to zlib.
|
| +
|
| + See the contrib/delphi directory in the zlib distribution.
|
| +
|
| +11. Can zlib handle .zip archives?
|
| +
|
| + Not by itself, no. See the directory contrib/minizip in the zlib
|
| + distribution.
|
| +
|
| +12. Can zlib handle .Z files?
|
| +
|
| + No, sorry. You have to spawn an uncompress or gunzip subprocess, or adapt
|
| + the code of uncompress on your own.
|
| +
|
| +13. How can I make a Unix shared library?
|
| +
|
| + By default a shared (and a static) library is built for Unix. So:
|
| +
|
| + make distclean
|
| + ./configure
|
| + make
|
| +
|
| +14. How do I install a shared zlib library on Unix?
|
| +
|
| + After the above, then:
|
| +
|
| + make install
|
| +
|
| + However, many flavors of Unix come with a shared zlib already installed.
|
| + Before going to the trouble of compiling a shared version of zlib and
|
| + trying to install it, you may want to check if it's already there! If you
|
| + can #include <zlib.h>, it's there. The -lz option will probably link to
|
| + it. You can check the version at the top of zlib.h or with the
|
| + ZLIB_VERSION symbol defined in zlib.h .
|
| +
|
| +15. I have a question about OttoPDF.
|
| +
|
| + We are not the authors of OttoPDF. The real author is on the OttoPDF web
|
| + site: Joel Hainley, jhainley@myndkryme.com.
|
| +
|
| +16. Can zlib decode Flate data in an Adobe PDF file?
|
| +
|
| + Yes. See http://www.pdflib.com/ . To modify PDF forms, see
|
| + http://sourceforge.net/projects/acroformtool/ .
|
| +
|
| +17. Why am I getting this "register_frame_info not found" error on Solaris?
|
| +
|
| + After installing zlib 1.1.4 on Solaris 2.6, running applications using zlib
|
| + generates an error such as:
|
| +
|
| + ld.so.1: rpm: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/local/lib/libz.so:
|
| + symbol __register_frame_info: referenced symbol not found
|
| +
|
| + The symbol __register_frame_info is not part of zlib, it is generated by
|
| + the C compiler (cc or gcc). You must recompile applications using zlib
|
| + which have this problem. This problem is specific to Solaris. See
|
| + http://www.sunfreeware.com for Solaris versions of zlib and applications
|
| + using zlib.
|
| +
|
| +18. Why does gzip give an error on a file I make with compress/deflate?
|
| +
|
| + The compress and deflate functions produce data in the zlib format, which
|
| + is different and incompatible with the gzip format. The gz* functions in
|
| + zlib on the other hand use the gzip format. Both the zlib and gzip formats
|
| + use the same compressed data format internally, but have different headers
|
| + and trailers around the compressed data.
|
| +
|
| +19. Ok, so why are there two different formats?
|
| +
|
| + The gzip format was designed to retain the directory information about a
|
| + single file, such as the name and last modification date. The zlib format
|
| + on the other hand was designed for in-memory and communication channel
|
| + applications, and has a much more compact header and trailer and uses a
|
| + faster integrity check than gzip.
|
| +
|
| +20. Well that's nice, but how do I make a gzip file in memory?
|
| +
|
| + You can request that deflate write the gzip format instead of the zlib
|
| + format using deflateInit2(). You can also request that inflate decode the
|
| + gzip format using inflateInit2(). Read zlib.h for more details.
|
| +
|
| +21. Is zlib thread-safe?
|
| +
|
| + Yes. However any library routines that zlib uses and any application-
|
| + provided memory allocation routines must also be thread-safe. zlib's gz*
|
| + functions use stdio library routines, and most of zlib's functions use the
|
| + library memory allocation routines by default. zlib's *Init* functions
|
| + allow for the application to provide custom memory allocation routines.
|
| +
|
| + Of course, you should only operate on any given zlib or gzip stream from a
|
| + single thread at a time.
|
| +
|
| +22. Can I use zlib in my commercial application?
|
| +
|
| + Yes. Please read the license in zlib.h.
|
| +
|
| +23. Is zlib under the GNU license?
|
| +
|
| + No. Please read the license in zlib.h.
|
| +
|
| +24. The license says that altered source versions must be "plainly marked". So
|
| + what exactly do I need to do to meet that requirement?
|
| +
|
| + You need to change the ZLIB_VERSION and ZLIB_VERNUM #defines in zlib.h. In
|
| + particular, the final version number needs to be changed to "f", and an
|
| + identification string should be appended to ZLIB_VERSION. Version numbers
|
| + x.x.x.f are reserved for modifications to zlib by others than the zlib
|
| + maintainers. For example, if the version of the base zlib you are altering
|
| + is "1.2.3.4", then in zlib.h you should change ZLIB_VERNUM to 0x123f, and
|
| + ZLIB_VERSION to something like "1.2.3.f-zachary-mods-v3". You can also
|
| + update the version strings in deflate.c and inftrees.c.
|
| +
|
| + For altered source distributions, you should also note the origin and
|
| + nature of the changes in zlib.h, as well as in ChangeLog and README, along
|
| + with the dates of the alterations. The origin should include at least your
|
| + name (or your company's name), and an email address to contact for help or
|
| + issues with the library.
|
| +
|
| + Note that distributing a compiled zlib library along with zlib.h and
|
| + zconf.h is also a source distribution, and so you should change
|
| + ZLIB_VERSION and ZLIB_VERNUM and note the origin and nature of the changes
|
| + in zlib.h as you would for a full source distribution.
|
| +
|
| +25. Will zlib work on a big-endian or little-endian architecture, and can I
|
| + exchange compressed data between them?
|
| +
|
| + Yes and yes.
|
| +
|
| +26. Will zlib work on a 64-bit machine?
|
| +
|
| + Yes. It has been tested on 64-bit machines, and has no dependence on any
|
| + data types being limited to 32-bits in length. If you have any
|
| + difficulties, please provide a complete problem report to zlib@gzip.org
|
| +
|
| +27. Will zlib decompress data from the PKWare Data Compression Library?
|
| +
|
| + No. The PKWare DCL uses a completely different compressed data format than
|
| + does PKZIP and zlib. However, you can look in zlib's contrib/blast
|
| + directory for a possible solution to your problem.
|
| +
|
| +28. Can I access data randomly in a compressed stream?
|
| +
|
| + No, not without some preparation. If when compressing you periodically use
|
| + Z_FULL_FLUSH, carefully write all the pending data at those points, and
|
| + keep an index of those locations, then you can start decompression at those
|
| + points. You have to be careful to not use Z_FULL_FLUSH too often, since it
|
| + can significantly degrade compression. Alternatively, you can scan a
|
| + deflate stream once to generate an index, and then use that index for
|
| + random access. See examples/zran.c .
|
| +
|
| +29. Does zlib work on MVS, OS/390, CICS, etc.?
|
| +
|
| + It has in the past, but we have not heard of any recent evidence. There
|
| + were working ports of zlib 1.1.4 to MVS, but those links no longer work.
|
| + If you know of recent, successful applications of zlib on these operating
|
| + systems, please let us know. Thanks.
|
| +
|
| +30. Is there some simpler, easier to read version of inflate I can look at to
|
| + understand the deflate format?
|
| +
|
| + First off, you should read RFC 1951. Second, yes. Look in zlib's
|
| + contrib/puff directory.
|
| +
|
| +31. Does zlib infringe on any patents?
|
| +
|
| + As far as we know, no. In fact, that was originally the whole point behind
|
| + zlib. Look here for some more information:
|
| +
|
| + http://www.gzip.org/#faq11
|
| +
|
| +32. Can zlib work with greater than 4 GB of data?
|
| +
|
| + Yes. inflate() and deflate() will process any amount of data correctly.
|
| + Each call of inflate() or deflate() is limited to input and output chunks
|
| + of the maximum value that can be stored in the compiler's "unsigned int"
|
| + type, but there is no limit to the number of chunks. Note however that the
|
| + strm.total_in and strm_total_out counters may be limited to 4 GB. These
|
| + counters are provided as a convenience and are not used internally by
|
| + inflate() or deflate(). The application can easily set up its own counters
|
| + updated after each call of inflate() or deflate() to count beyond 4 GB.
|
| + compress() and uncompress() may be limited to 4 GB, since they operate in a
|
| + single call. gzseek() and gztell() may be limited to 4 GB depending on how
|
| + zlib is compiled. See the zlibCompileFlags() function in zlib.h.
|
| +
|
| + The word "may" appears several times above since there is a 4 GB limit only
|
| + if the compiler's "long" type is 32 bits. If the compiler's "long" type is
|
| + 64 bits, then the limit is 16 exabytes.
|
| +
|
| +33. Does zlib have any security vulnerabilities?
|
| +
|
| + The only one that we are aware of is potentially in gzprintf(). If zlib is
|
| + compiled to use sprintf() or vsprintf(), then there is no protection
|
| + against a buffer overflow of an 8K string space (or other value as set by
|
| + gzbuffer()), other than the caller of gzprintf() assuring that the output
|
| + will not exceed 8K. On the other hand, if zlib is compiled to use
|
| + snprintf() or vsnprintf(), which should normally be the case, then there is
|
| + no vulnerability. The ./configure script will display warnings if an
|
| + insecure variation of sprintf() will be used by gzprintf(). Also the
|
| + zlibCompileFlags() function will return information on what variant of
|
| + sprintf() is used by gzprintf().
|
| +
|
| + If you don't have snprintf() or vsnprintf() and would like one, you can
|
| + find a portable implementation here:
|
| +
|
| + http://www.ijs.si/software/snprintf/
|
| +
|
| + Note that you should be using the most recent version of zlib. Versions
|
| + 1.1.3 and before were subject to a double-free vulnerability, and versions
|
| + 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 were subject to an access exception when decompressing
|
| + invalid compressed data.
|
| +
|
| +34. Is there a Java version of zlib?
|
| +
|
| + Probably what you want is to use zlib in Java. zlib is already included
|
| + as part of the Java SDK in the java.util.zip package. If you really want
|
| + a version of zlib written in the Java language, look on the zlib home
|
| + page for links: http://zlib.net/ .
|
| +
|
| +35. I get this or that compiler or source-code scanner warning when I crank it
|
| + up to maximally-pedantic. Can't you guys write proper code?
|
| +
|
| + Many years ago, we gave up attempting to avoid warnings on every compiler
|
| + in the universe. It just got to be a waste of time, and some compilers
|
| + were downright silly as well as contradicted each other. So now, we simply
|
| + make sure that the code always works.
|
| +
|
| +36. Valgrind (or some similar memory access checker) says that deflate is
|
| + performing a conditional jump that depends on an uninitialized value.
|
| + Isn't that a bug?
|
| +
|
| + No. That is intentional for performance reasons, and the output of deflate
|
| + is not affected. This only started showing up recently since zlib 1.2.x
|
| + uses malloc() by default for allocations, whereas earlier versions used
|
| + calloc(), which zeros out the allocated memory. Even though the code was
|
| + correct, versions 1.2.4 and later was changed to not stimulate these
|
| + checkers.
|
| +
|
| +37. Will zlib read the (insert any ancient or arcane format here) compressed
|
| + data format?
|
| +
|
| + Probably not. Look in the comp.compression FAQ for pointers to various
|
| + formats and associated software.
|
| +
|
| +38. How can I encrypt/decrypt zip files with zlib?
|
| +
|
| + zlib doesn't support encryption. The original PKZIP encryption is very
|
| + weak and can be broken with freely available programs. To get strong
|
| + encryption, use GnuPG, http://www.gnupg.org/ , which already includes zlib
|
| + compression. For PKZIP compatible "encryption", look at
|
| + http://www.info-zip.org/
|
| +
|
| +39. What's the difference between the "gzip" and "deflate" HTTP 1.1 encodings?
|
| +
|
| + "gzip" is the gzip format, and "deflate" is the zlib format. They should
|
| + probably have called the second one "zlib" instead to avoid confusion with
|
| + the raw deflate compressed data format. While the HTTP 1.1 RFC 2616
|
| + correctly points to the zlib specification in RFC 1950 for the "deflate"
|
| + transfer encoding, there have been reports of servers and browsers that
|
| + incorrectly produce or expect raw deflate data per the deflate
|
| + specification in RFC 1951, most notably Microsoft. So even though the
|
| + "deflate" transfer encoding using the zlib format would be the more
|
| + efficient approach (and in fact exactly what the zlib format was designed
|
| + for), using the "gzip" transfer encoding is probably more reliable due to
|
| + an unfortunate choice of name on the part of the HTTP 1.1 authors.
|
| +
|
| + Bottom line: use the gzip format for HTTP 1.1 encoding.
|
| +
|
| +40. Does zlib support the new "Deflate64" format introduced by PKWare?
|
| +
|
| + No. PKWare has apparently decided to keep that format proprietary, since
|
| + they have not documented it as they have previous compression formats. In
|
| + any case, the compression improvements are so modest compared to other more
|
| + modern approaches, that it's not worth the effort to implement.
|
| +
|
| +41. I'm having a problem with the zip functions in zlib, can you help?
|
| +
|
| + There are no zip functions in zlib. You are probably using minizip by
|
| + Giles Vollant, which is found in the contrib directory of zlib. It is not
|
| + part of zlib. In fact none of the stuff in contrib is part of zlib. The
|
| + files in there are not supported by the zlib authors. You need to contact
|
| + the authors of the respective contribution for help.
|
| +
|
| +42. The match.asm code in contrib is under the GNU General Public License.
|
| + Since it's part of zlib, doesn't that mean that all of zlib falls under the
|
| + GNU GPL?
|
| +
|
| + No. The files in contrib are not part of zlib. They were contributed by
|
| + other authors and are provided as a convenience to the user within the zlib
|
| + distribution. Each item in contrib has its own license.
|
| +
|
| +43. Is zlib subject to export controls? What is its ECCN?
|
| +
|
| + zlib is not subject to export controls, and so is classified as EAR99.
|
| +
|
| +44. Can you please sign these lengthy legal documents and fax them back to us
|
| + so that we can use your software in our product?
|
| +
|
| + No. Go away. Shoo.
|
|
|