Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2492)

Unified Diff: base/barrier_closure_unittest.cc

Issue 1116833002: Fixed member use after destruction in BarrierClosure. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Added test case. Created 5 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « base/barrier_closure.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: base/barrier_closure_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/barrier_closure_unittest.cc b/base/barrier_closure_unittest.cc
index ab05cb8af540f82f53420a7df47b99fdc0685d39..6ddf60ad042c95c83abdea98856f3db6896f2036 100644
--- a/base/barrier_closure_unittest.cc
+++ b/base/barrier_closure_unittest.cc
@@ -13,24 +13,62 @@ void Increment(int* count) { (*count)++; }
TEST(BarrierClosureTest, RunImmediatelyForZeroClosures) {
int count = 0;
- base::Closure doneClosure(base::Bind(&Increment, base::Unretained(&count)));
+ base::Closure done_closure(base::Bind(&Increment, base::Unretained(&count)));
- base::Closure barrierClosure = base::BarrierClosure(0, doneClosure);
+ base::Closure barrier_closure = base::BarrierClosure(0, done_closure);
EXPECT_EQ(1, count);
}
TEST(BarrierClosureTest, RunAfterNumClosures) {
int count = 0;
- base::Closure doneClosure(base::Bind(&Increment, base::Unretained(&count)));
+ base::Closure done_closure(base::Bind(&Increment, base::Unretained(&count)));
- base::Closure barrierClosure = base::BarrierClosure(2, doneClosure);
+ base::Closure barrier_closure = base::BarrierClosure(2, done_closure);
EXPECT_EQ(0, count);
- barrierClosure.Run();
+ barrier_closure.Run();
EXPECT_EQ(0, count);
- barrierClosure.Run();
+ barrier_closure.Run();
EXPECT_EQ(1, count);
}
+class DestructionIndicator {
+ public:
+ // Sets |*destructed| to true in destructor.
+ DestructionIndicator(bool* destructed) : destructed_(destructed) {
+ *destructed_ = false;
+ }
+
+ ~DestructionIndicator() { *destructed_ = true; }
+
+ void DoNothing() {}
+
+ private:
+ bool* destructed_;
+};
+
+TEST(BarrierClosureTest, ReleasesDoneClosureWhenDone) {
+ bool done_destructed = false;
+ base::Closure barrier_closure = base::BarrierClosure(
+ 1, base::Bind(&DestructionIndicator::DoNothing,
+ base::Owned(new DestructionIndicator(&done_destructed))));
+ CHECK(!done_destructed);
danakj 2015/05/05 18:58:14 Use EXPECT_TRUE/EXPECT_FALSE instead of CHECK in t
dzhioev (left Google) 2015/05/06 23:13:04 Done.
+ barrier_closure.Run();
+ CHECK(done_destructed);
+}
+
+void ReleaseClosure(base::Closure* closure) {
danakj 2015/05/05 18:58:14 can you call this ResetBarrierClosure?
dzhioev (left Google) 2015/05/06 23:13:05 Done.
+ *closure = base::Closure();
+}
+
+// Tests a case when client releases a reference to barrierClosure in
danakj 2015/05/05 18:58:14 BarrierClosure
dzhioev (left Google) 2015/05/06 23:13:04 Done.
+// |done_closure|.
+TEST(BarrierClosureTest, KeepingClosureAliveUntilDone) {
+ base::Closure barrier_closure;
+ base::Closure done_closure = base::Bind(ReleaseClosure, &barrier_closure);
+ barrier_closure = base::BarrierClosure(1, done_closure);
danakj 2015/05/05 18:58:14 Can you add a more verbose comment explaining what
dzhioev (left Google) 2015/05/06 23:13:04 Done.
+ barrier_closure.Run();
+}
+
} // namespace
« no previous file with comments | « base/barrier_closure.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698