Build Chromium Mojo unittests on CQ and main waterfall GN bots.

Build Chromium Mojo unittests on CQ and main waterfall GN bots.

Build (but don't run) new test targets on the following bots:
  chromium.linux "Linux GN"
  chromium.linux "Linux GN (dbg)"
  tryserver.chromium.linux "linux_chromium_gn_chromeos_dbg"
  tryserver.chromium.linux "linux_chromium_gn_chromeos_rel"
  tryserver.chromium.linux "linux_chromium_gn_dbg"
  tryserver.chromium.linux "linux_chromium_gn_rel"

Add targets to each supported bot:
  html_viewer_unittests (release only, no debug component builds)
  mojo_runner_unittests (release only, no debug component builds)
  mojo_shell_unittests
  mojo_surfaces_lib_unittests
  view_manager_service_unittests (release only, no debug component builds)

These match the Chromium Mojo FYI waterfall unittest targets:
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/build/scripts/slave/recipes/chromium_mojo.py

BUG=478244
TEST=CQ and main waterfall GN bots build new test targets.
R=sky@chromium.org,dpranke@chromium.org

Committed: https://crrev.com/4c7c42a264c1537507ee1beb86c2d81fae68cb80
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#327454}

[msw, 2015-04-28 22:35:34]

The CQ bit was checked by msw@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-28 22:37:12]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1110193004/1

[msw, 2015-04-28 22:37:57]

msw@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ dpranke@chromium.org

[msw, 2015-04-28 22:38:14]

Hey Scott and Dirk, please take a look; thanks!

[Dirk Pranke, 2015-04-28 22:43:15]

lgtm.

I'm starting to add tests to the bots (particularly the waterfall bots), and I
would guess these all run pretty quickly. Would it be good to actually run them
and get rid of the FYI bots (which look like they've been broken for days?).

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-28 22:47:05]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-28 22:47:06]

Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders:
  linux_chromium_gn_chromeos_rel on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
  linux_chromium_gn_dbg on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
  linux_chromium_gn_rel on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)

[msw, 2015-04-28 22:48:04]

On 2015/04/28 22:43:15, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> lgtm.
> 
> I'm starting to add tests to the bots (particularly the waterfall bots), and I
> would guess these all run pretty quickly. Would it be good to actually run
them
> and get rid of the FYI bots (which look like they've been broken for days?).

Running these on CQ and main waterfall would be great, once they all pass.
(window_manager_unittests may fail as-is <http://crbug.com/479031>)

We shouldn't get rid of the FYI waterfall yet, those still run our apptests.
(also, we'd need to ensure the Android main/CQ bots mirror our FYI config)

On FYI, Linux is now green, and Android passes some tests... it's a WIP.

[Dirk Pranke, 2015-04-28 22:51:39]

On 2015/04/28 22:48:04, msw wrote:
> On FYI, Linux is now green, and Android passes some tests... it's a WIP.

Are you talking about
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/Chromium%20Linux%20Mojo 
or http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.mojo/builders/Chromium%20Mojo%20Linux ?

I was talking about the former, though I don't know why we have both. I thought
the latter was more
for the mojo team to run tests against mojo services that needed Chromium code
but that Chromium
wouldn't ever care about. 

Of course, w/ mandoline things may have changed enough that that distinction no
longer holds.

[msw, 2015-04-28 22:51:42]

The CQ bit was checked by msw@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[msw, 2015-04-28 22:51:42]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from dpranke@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1110193004/#ps20001
(title: "Remove deleted window_manager_unittests target.")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-28 22:52:19]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1110193004/20001

[msw, 2015-04-28 22:59:44]

On 2015/04/28 22:51:39, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> On 2015/04/28 22:48:04, msw wrote:
> > On FYI, Linux is now green, and Android passes some tests... it's a WIP.
> 
> Are you talking about
> http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/Chromium%20Linux%20Mojo 
> or http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.mojo/builders/Chromium%20Mojo%20Linux
?
> 
> I was talking about the former, though I don't know why we have both. I
thought
> the latter was more
> for the mojo team to run tests against mojo services that needed Chromium code
> but that Chromium
> wouldn't ever care about. 
> 
> Of course, w/ mandoline things may have changed enough that that distinction
no
> longer holds.

I meant the latter (Chromium Mojo Linux), from the (Mandoline-ish) waterfall:
  http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.mojo/console

I'll try nuking "Chromium Linux Mojo" and "Chromium Windows Mojo" asap.
Indeed, those those are most likely irrelevant at this point.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-28 23:02:20]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-28 23:02:21]

Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders:
  linux_chromium_gn_chromeos_rel on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
  linux_chromium_gn_dbg on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)
  linux_chromium_gn_rel on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)

[msw, 2015-04-28 23:08:29]

The CQ bit was checked by msw@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[msw, 2015-04-28 23:08:29]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from dpranke@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1110193004/#ps40001
(title: "Remove deleted mojo_application_manager_unittests target.")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-28 23:10:05]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1110193004/40001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-28 23:23:17]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-28 23:23:20]

Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders:
  linux_chromium_gn_dbg on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)

[sky, 2015-04-28 23:37:23]

LGTM

[msw, 2015-04-29 02:56:30]

I removed html_viewer_unittests from the debug bots, it doesn't support
is_component_build=true.

[msw, 2015-04-29 02:57:35]

The CQ bit was checked by msw@chromium.org

[msw, 2015-04-29 02:57:35]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from
dpranke@chromium.org, sky@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1110193004/#ps60001
(title: "Skip html_viewer_unittests on dbg bots, target isn't defined for
is_component_build=true.")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-29 02:58:00]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1110193004/60001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-29 03:07:38]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-29 03:07:38]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  linux_chromium_gn_dbg on tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/linux_chromium_...)

[msw, 2015-04-29 06:00:02]

The CQ bit was checked by msw@chromium.org

[msw, 2015-04-29 06:00:03]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from
dpranke@chromium.org, sky@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1110193004/#ps120001
(title: "And mojo_shell_unittests...")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-29 06:00:32]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1110193004/120001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-29 09:12:33]

Committed patchset #7 (id:120001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-04-29 09:13:30]

Patchset 7 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/4c7c42a264c1537507ee1beb86c2d81fae68cb80
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#327454}