content/common/wake_lock_service.mojom - Issue 1107333002: Wake Lock API implementation (Chromium part)

Side by Side Diff

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Side by Side Diff: content/common/wake_lock_service.mojom

Issue 1107333002: Wake Lock API implementation (Chromium part) (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master

Patch Set: Created 5 years, 7 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

OLD	NEW
1 // Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.	1 // Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.

2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be	2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be

3 // found in the LICENSE file.	3 // found in the LICENSE file.

4	4

5 this.onfetch = function(event) {	5 module content;

6 var blob = new Blob(['<title>Title</title>']);	6

7 var response = new Response(blob);	7 // WebLockService receives per-frame wake lock intention from its client

8 event.respondWith(response);	8 interface WakeLockService {

	9 KeepScreenAwake(bool intention);
	Tom Sepez 2015/04/28 16:22:54 Nit: again, mauybe it would be clearer with two me Nit: again, mauybe it would be clearer with two methods rather than passing a bool? mlamouri (slow - plz ping) 2015/05/05 14:08:34 +1 Show quoted text On 2015/04/28 at 16:22:54, Tom Sepez wrote: > Nit: again, mauybe it would be clearer with two methods rather than passing a bool? +1
9 };	10 };

OLD	NEW