| Index: test/mozilla/mozilla.status
|
| ===================================================================
|
| --- test/mozilla/mozilla.status (revision 868)
|
| +++ test/mozilla/mozilla.status (working copy)
|
| @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
|
| # depth 500. KJS detects the case, and return null from the match,
|
| # and passes this test (the test doesn't check for a correct return
|
| # value).
|
| -ecma_3/RegExp/regress-119909: FAIL_OK
|
| +ecma_3/RegExp/regress-119909: PASS || FAIL_OK
|
|
|
|
|
| # Difference in the way capturing subpatterns work. In JS, when the
|
| @@ -236,6 +236,13 @@
|
| ecma_3/RegExp/regress-330684: FAIL_OK
|
|
|
|
|
| +# This test contains a regexp that runs exponentially long. Spidermonkey
|
| +# standalone will hang, though apparently inside Firefox it will trigger a
|
| +# long-running-script timeout. JSCRE passes by hitting the matchLimit and
|
| +# just pretending that an exhaustive search found no match.
|
| +ecma_3/RegExp/regress-307456: PASS || FAIL_OK
|
| +
|
| +
|
| # We do not detect overflow in bounds for back references and {}
|
| # quantifiers. Might fix by parsing numbers differently?
|
| js1_5/Regress/regress-230216-2: FAIL_OK
|
| @@ -247,11 +254,11 @@
|
|
|
|
|
| # Regexp too long for PCRE.
|
| -js1_5/Regress/regress-280769: FAIL_OK
|
| -js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-1: FAIL_OK
|
| -js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-2: FAIL_OK
|
| -js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-4: FAIL_OK
|
| -js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-5: FAIL_OK
|
| +js1_5/Regress/regress-280769: PASS || FAIL
|
| +js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-1: PASS || FAIL
|
| +js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-2: PASS || FAIL
|
| +js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-4: PASS || FAIL
|
| +js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-5: PASS || FAIL
|
|
|
|
|
| # We do not support static RegExp.multiline - should we?.
|
| @@ -286,10 +293,6 @@
|
| js1_5/Regress/regress-320119: FAIL_OK
|
|
|
|
|
| -# We do not support explicit global evals through <global>.eval(...).
|
| -js1_5/Regress/regress-68498-003: FAIL_OK
|
| -
|
| -
|
| # No support for toSource().
|
| js1_5/Regress/regress-248444: FAIL_OK
|
| js1_5/Regress/regress-313967-01: FAIL_OK
|
| @@ -489,7 +492,7 @@
|
| # behavior and not the ECMA spec.
|
| ecma_3/RegExp/15.10.2-1: FAIL_OK
|
| ecma_3/RegExp/perlstress-001: FAIL_OK
|
| -ecma_3/RegExp/regress-334158: FAIL_OK
|
| +ecma_3/RegExp/regress-334158: PASS || FAIL
|
|
|
|
|
| # This test requires a failure if we try to compile a function with more
|
| @@ -577,10 +580,6 @@
|
| # Marked as: Will not fix. V8 throws an acceptable RangeError.
|
| js1_5/Expressions/regress-394673: FAIL
|
|
|
| -# Bug 1202598: New mozilla test js1_5/Regress/regress-383682 fails.
|
| -js1_5/Regress/regress-383682: FAIL
|
| -
|
| -
|
| ##################### MOZILLA EXTENSION TESTS #####################
|
|
|
| ecma/extensions/15.1.2.1-1: FAIL_OK
|
|
|