Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(481)

Unified Diff: test/mozilla/mozilla.status

Issue 11000: Periodic merge of bleeding_edge to experimental code generator branch.... (Closed) Base URL: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/experimental/toiger/
Patch Set: Created 12 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « test/mjsunit/unicode-test.js ('k') | tools/utils.py » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: test/mozilla/mozilla.status
===================================================================
--- test/mozilla/mozilla.status (revision 868)
+++ test/mozilla/mozilla.status (working copy)
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
# depth 500. KJS detects the case, and return null from the match,
# and passes this test (the test doesn't check for a correct return
# value).
-ecma_3/RegExp/regress-119909: FAIL_OK
+ecma_3/RegExp/regress-119909: PASS || FAIL_OK
# Difference in the way capturing subpatterns work. In JS, when the
@@ -236,6 +236,13 @@
ecma_3/RegExp/regress-330684: FAIL_OK
+# This test contains a regexp that runs exponentially long. Spidermonkey
+# standalone will hang, though apparently inside Firefox it will trigger a
+# long-running-script timeout. JSCRE passes by hitting the matchLimit and
+# just pretending that an exhaustive search found no match.
+ecma_3/RegExp/regress-307456: PASS || FAIL_OK
+
+
# We do not detect overflow in bounds for back references and {}
# quantifiers. Might fix by parsing numbers differently?
js1_5/Regress/regress-230216-2: FAIL_OK
@@ -247,11 +254,11 @@
# Regexp too long for PCRE.
-js1_5/Regress/regress-280769: FAIL_OK
-js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-1: FAIL_OK
-js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-2: FAIL_OK
-js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-4: FAIL_OK
-js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-5: FAIL_OK
+js1_5/Regress/regress-280769: PASS || FAIL
+js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-1: PASS || FAIL
+js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-2: PASS || FAIL
+js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-4: PASS || FAIL
+js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-5: PASS || FAIL
# We do not support static RegExp.multiline - should we?.
@@ -286,10 +293,6 @@
js1_5/Regress/regress-320119: FAIL_OK
-# We do not support explicit global evals through <global>.eval(...).
-js1_5/Regress/regress-68498-003: FAIL_OK
-
-
# No support for toSource().
js1_5/Regress/regress-248444: FAIL_OK
js1_5/Regress/regress-313967-01: FAIL_OK
@@ -489,7 +492,7 @@
# behavior and not the ECMA spec.
ecma_3/RegExp/15.10.2-1: FAIL_OK
ecma_3/RegExp/perlstress-001: FAIL_OK
-ecma_3/RegExp/regress-334158: FAIL_OK
+ecma_3/RegExp/regress-334158: PASS || FAIL
# This test requires a failure if we try to compile a function with more
@@ -577,10 +580,6 @@
# Marked as: Will not fix. V8 throws an acceptable RangeError.
js1_5/Expressions/regress-394673: FAIL
-# Bug 1202598: New mozilla test js1_5/Regress/regress-383682 fails.
-js1_5/Regress/regress-383682: FAIL
-
-
##################### MOZILLA EXTENSION TESTS #####################
ecma/extensions/15.1.2.1-1: FAIL_OK
« no previous file with comments | « test/mjsunit/unicode-test.js ('k') | tools/utils.py » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698