Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1141)

Unified Diff: content/browser/media/capture/time_weighted_average.h

Issue 1097633005: FeedbackSignalAccumulator utility class for averaging feedback signals (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | content/browser/media/capture/time_weighted_average.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: content/browser/media/capture/time_weighted_average.h
diff --git a/content/browser/media/capture/time_weighted_average.h b/content/browser/media/capture/time_weighted_average.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43f536b8e1b9a474f2e48fe3a789c5fee0514d14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/browser/media/capture/time_weighted_average.h
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_MEDIA_CAPTURE_TIME_WEIGHTED_AVERAGE_H_
+#define CONTENT_BROWSER_MEDIA_CAPTURE_TIME_WEIGHTED_AVERAGE_H_
+
+#include "base/time/time.h"
+#include "content/common/content_export.h"
+
+namespace content {
+
+// Utility class for maintaining an time-weighted moving average value of a
hubbe 2015/04/27 20:50:42 I think time-weighted might be an accurate but con
miu 2015/05/05 04:56:59 Done.
+// metric value.
hubbe 2015/04/27 20:50:42 It doesn't work with imperial values? :)
miu 2015/05/05 04:56:59 Done.
+//
+// Usage note: Reset() must be called at least once before the first call to
+// Update().
+class CONTENT_EXPORT TimeWeightedAverage {
+ public:
+ // |time_constant| is the amount of time that must pass between two data
+ // points to move the average value halfway in-between. Example: If
+ // |time_constant| is one second, then calling Reset(0.0, t=0s) and then
+ // Update(1.0, t=1s) will result in a moving average of 0.5.
+ explicit TimeWeightedAverage(base::TimeDelta time_constant);
hubbe 2015/04/27 20:50:42 maybe call time_constant half_life instead? Althou
miu 2015/05/05 04:56:59 Done. Yeah, half_life is a great name for this!
+
+ // Erase all memory of historical values, re-starting with the given
+ // |starting_value|.
+ void Reset(double starting_value, base::TimeTicks timestamp);
+ base::TimeTicks last_reset_time() const { return last_reset_time_; }
+
+ // Update the average using the given |value| which was observed at the given
+ // |timestamp|. If the timestamp was no more than one step out-of-order, the
hubbe 2015/04/27 20:50:42 Wait, what's a step?
miu 2015/05/05 04:56:59 Done. Explained this further in class-level comme
+ // update succeeds and this method returns true. Otherwise the update has no
+ // effect and false is returned.
+ //
+ // Two or more updates at the same |timestamp| will have their values
+ // arithmetically averaged to form a single data point. This single data
+ // point is then rolled into the moving average.
+ bool Update(double value, base::TimeTicks timestamp);
+
+ // Accessors to current state.
+ double current() const { return average_; }
+ base::TimeTicks latest_timestamp() const { return most_recent_timestamp_; }
+
+ // Convenience methods.
+ bool was_recently_updated(base::TimeTicks now) const {
hubbe 2015/04/27 20:50:42 This seems like an odd function I think "recent" n
miu 2015/05/05 04:56:59 I got rid of this one. I may or may not introduce
+ return (now - latest_timestamp()) <= time_constant_;
+ }
+ base::TimeDelta elapsed_since_reset() const {
hubbe 2015/04/27 20:50:42 This also seems like an odd function. From the nam
miu 2015/05/05 04:56:59 Removed this one too. I may or may not introduce
+ return latest_timestamp() - last_reset_time();
+ }
+
+ private:
+ // Step the moving |average_| backward/forward.
+ void StepBackward(double last_value, base::TimeDelta elapsed);
+ void StepForward(double next_value, base::TimeDelta elapsed);
+
+ // Modify |most_recent_value_| to an unweigthed arithmetic average that
+ // includes |value|.
+ void MergeWithMostRecentDataPoint(double value);
+
+ const base::TimeDelta time_constant_;
+ base::TimeTicks last_reset_time_;
+ double average_;
+ double most_recent_value_;
+ int most_recent_count_;
+ base::TimeTicks most_recent_timestamp_;
+ base::TimeTicks second_most_recent_timestamp_;
+};
+
+} // namespace content
+
+#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_MEDIA_CAPTURE_TIME_WEIGHTED_AVERAGE_H_
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | content/browser/media/capture/time_weighted_average.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698